The Chilean Education System - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 24
About This Presentation
Title:

The Chilean Education System

Description:

'devolution' of health and education among other functions to ... Teaching Practice-Teaching Assesment. Institutional Good Practices. Quality assurance ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:396
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 25
Provided by: refue
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: The Chilean Education System


1
The Chilean Education System
  • By Ricardo Fuentes
  • Chiles Ministry of Education.
  • Agenda II Forum Hemisférico La calidad de la
    Educación

2
Organizational structure
3
Schools by administrative category
4
Enrollment by school administrative category
5
The descentralization process in education
  • 1980 Authoritarian political regime
  • devolution of health and education among other
    functions to municipalities wich have no
    democratic authorities elected.
  • Introduction of a new financing model, based on
    subsidizing demand. And the funds was directly
    delivered to the owner of the school, even if it
    is calculated by student.

6
The descentralization process in education
  • Elimination teachers status as a public employees
  • Utilization of legal and market instruments like
    incentives to stimulate the creation and growth
    of state-funded private schools.

7
Municipal Schools
  • Municipal schools are administered by Chiles 341
    municipal governments, using either of two
    possible systems municipal education
    administrative departments (DAEM, 289) or
    municipally controlled non-profit corporations
    (52).
  • 72,65 municipal students came from 40 poorest
    population
  • Between 1981 and 2000, the municipal education
    funding growth from US63,537,000 to
    US97,374,000. Wich means 53(2000 USD).

8
Municipal Schools
  • In 2000, this mount was 6.52 of total subsidys
    expenditure and 3.88 over total expenditure
    education
  • The 56 of total municipal financial resources
    are focused only in 47 municipalitys and 155
    municipalitys have less than 15.000 peoples.
  • Their management capacities are very diferent
    because they are heterogeneus and have different
    population, local wealth, local poverty, tax
    collect capacity, leadership and organization
    culture.
  • They cant chose students or reject them. In fact
    they are the guardians of public education

9
Private state subsidized schools
  • Enrollment 1.302.010 (36,58)
  • N schools 3.460
  • Urbans 2.378 (94,33)
  • Rurals 839 (5,67)
  • Primary Enrollment 66,84
  • Secondary enrollment 22,65 (50TP)
  • Teachers 41.053 (27,74)

10
Private state subsidized schools
  • Actually 57 of this schools dont have sharing
    funding with parents
  • 43 have sharing funding with parents and the
    public subsidy, wich has a non proportional and
    sligthy stated financial discount.
  • 51 of this schools belong to individual owners,
    16 belong to profit aims institutions, and 33
    are non profit institutions.
  • In OECD opinion, this schools are not more
    performer or efficient than municipal schools. Is
    difficult to compare beacuse they chose their
    students and this selections normally exclude the
    more difficult students.

11
Public Expenditure on Education
  • Public expenditure in education almost tripled,
    going from US 907.8 million to US 3.017 million
    (in constant dollars) from 1990 to 2002
  • In 2001 the public expenditure in education was
    4.4 over the GDP and a 18.5 over total public
    expenditure
  • The same year the spend by student was US 539.5
    in primary, US 609.6 in secondary and US1.360
    in terciary
  • Between 1990 an 2001 taht means a 151.4 in
    primary, 191.7 in secondary and 63.5 in
    postsecondary education.

12
Educational Policies in the 1990s
  • In 1990, after more than a decade and a half of
    authoritarian policies and a decade of
    neo-liberal economic policies, a democratic
    government led by a center-left political
    alliance began to apply a new agenda to education
    policies, providing a protected national level
    statute to teachers.
  • The new agenda has focused on the objectives of
    quality and equity in terms of contexts and the
    school systems learning outputs.

13
Educational Policies in the 1990s
  • Its implementation has depended on the State not
    only ensuring the minimum conditions for
    educations functioning (subsidiary role), as it
    did in the 1980s, but also defining and
    conducting policies for developing this sector
    (leadership role).
  • This meant redefining the states role in sense
    to involve a dual approach that shaped all
    policies in the 1990s and thus redefined the
    nature of public action in education this
    included universally applied, comprehensive
    programs to improve learning and specific,
    compensatory programs, focusing on primary and
    secondary schools with the least resources, to
    improve equity, all that with a market funding
    system

14
Educational policies from the 1990s
  • Building Basic Conditions
  • Infrastructure
  • Teachers labour policies
  • - Equipments and resources
  • - Institutions

First step 1990 1995
  • Currricular reform and Full School Day
  • More time for learning
  • Better and depper improvement programes
  • - Better and more teaching procces
  • - Curriculum reform

Second step 1996-1999
Third step 2000 - ....
  • The class room reform
  • Frameworks and support inside the class room
  • Responsabilization and authonomy
  • Teaching Practice-Teaching Assesment
  • Institutional Good Practices
  • Quality assurance
  • Local network and partnership

15
Results of 1990s policies
  • Increase the enrollment and coverage, specially
    among lower income families
  • Inprovements to the learning resource base
    (universal acces text in language, maths,
    history, science and english)
  • Improve social assistance to students of lower
    income backgrounds from preschool to high school
    (meals and health)
  • Changes in teaching practices

16
Results of 1990s policies
  • Learning results
  • Grade 4, primary
  • Slightly improve in maths and language between
    1992 and 1996
  • Stagnate between 1996 and 2002
  • None of the school categorys regresed during this
    period.
  • The best results were for paid education, in
    second place the private subsidized schools and
    in the last place the municipal schools.
  • The gap between municipal and paid scools fell
    between 1992-1996 in maths, then rose between
    1996 and 2002, with a slightly dropp.

17
Results of 1990s policies
  • Grade 4, language
  • All the schools alternate episodes of increases
    with sligth declines. As with maths the gap
    between publicly financed and paid private
    schools decline, between 1992 and 1996
  • Changes from 1996 and 2002, varied by category
  • Paid private schools advance
  • Municipal schools fell
  • Public subsidized schools are stagnated

18
Results of 1990s policies
  • Grade 8 end of primary school
  • Only maths and language can be comparated between
    1993 and 1997, both had minors but consistent
    increases
  • Between 1997 and 2000, there is a decline in
    language (3 points), while maths remains stable.
    Significant rises ocur in science (10 points) and
    history (6 points)

19
Results of 1990s policies
  • Secondary Education
  • There are a national test in second year of high
    school (1994,1998 and 2001). This results shows a
    sligth improvement in maths and stable results
    for language, with more students covered,
    particullary from the poorest population
  • Average scores when not controlled for students
    socio-economics characteristics, are
    sistematically higher for private subsidized
    schools, wich also operate at a lower cost per
    students than municipal schools.

20
Educational policies from the 1990s
  • 1990s challenges
  • To correct inequitys with focused interventions
    by national programmes
  • To invest in better schools, equipments,
    buildings
  • To invest in school management, team work,
    leadership
  • Increase the accountability of the system, more
    and better information to parents.
  • To promote the partnership with the private
    sector, enterprises, firms.

21
2000s challenges
  • To increase the responsability and educative
    authonomy of the schools
  • To improve and redirect our capacities and
    practices in supervision
  • Promote the school leadership like an axe of the
    school authonomy
  • To achieve better and widers learnings results.
    Specially among the poorest students.
  • To set an aditional subside for the poorest
    students and the school wich are capable to
    achieve betters and widers learnings results.
  • To set up instruments and periodic relationships
    with local governments, in order to have a
    strategic partnership for the quality of the
    education, not only like a national good but like
    a local good too. That means more flexibility in
    budget and in programmes.

22
Assurance Quality System Scheme
Technical Support for Education municipal staff
and Supervision system of MINEDUC
Training for Technical Support Institutions
Supervision and support
School Management Model
External evaluation model
Training for external Evaluators (municipal, And
Mineduc staff)
Training for School Management teams
Self evaluation process
Improvement Plans
External evaluation
Good Practices, sistematization Disemination and
transfer
23
Chilean School Management Model
24
National Standards for Headships
  • Principal aims of that policy
  • Prepare new headteachers
  • Training and improve the competences of the
    former headteachers
  • To evaluate the performance of the former
    headteachers
  • 4 Areas Leadership Curricular management,
    resources management and, organizational climate.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com