Title: Building psychological critical thinkers from day one
1Building psychologicalcritical thinkersfrom day
one
- Jane S. Halonen
- University of West Florida
2Objectives
- Explore (briefly) some aspects of
literature in critical thinking - Examine novice-to-expert progression as a
psychological thinker - Share teaching strategies that facilitate optimal
development (emphasis on
first course)
3This Sceptered Isle, A. Millar
- Education appears to have sunk to an
all-time low. Discipline is lax or nonexistent,
exams have been made easier over time to
compensate for falling standards, and
constant testing and the dumbing down
of the curriculum has eroded the
enthusiasm of pupils. -
6-13-2008
4Growth of CT in UK
- A level tests show sharp increase in students
taking CT version - Traditionalists criticize skills emphasis as
dismissive of content - In contrast, concentrating on skills that
transfer - Makes content as context for the skill
- Produces more enduring learning
- Facilitates greater employability
5- Nothing in education is so astonishing as the
amount of ignorance it accumulates in the form of
inert facts. - Henry Adams (1938-1918)
- American historian, author
6Origins of this accidental critical thinking
scholar
- Prototypical psych major (i.e.,
Why do I have to take research and statistics?) - New hire at Alverno College
- Research collaborator ?
- What does it mean to teach
critical thinking in psychology?
1983 - 1986
7 Why study psychology?
8Primary conclusions
- CT is best thought of as a state, not a
trait. - CT features are context-specific disciplinary
and developmental. - Engaging students to think critically is most
effective through disequilibrium. - Faculty struggle to surrender role of stage on
sage.
9The briefcase model
10Restoring equilibrium
11External event varies
- In the beginning, a whopper!
- For example SAGGING
- The lower the pants,
- The lower the IQ
- As students progress from
novice to expert, they can
handle nuance and subtlety.
12Fast forward to 2003
- A rubric for learning, teaching, and assessing
scientific inquiry in psychology - Halonen, Bosack, Clay, McCarthy
- Teaching of Psychology, 30,
- pp. 196-208
- SCIENTIFIC INQUIRY CRITICAL THINKING
13What are the relevant domains of CT in
psychology?
- Descriptive skills
- Conceptualization skills
- Problem-solving skills
- Ethical reasoning
- Practice of scientific values
- Communication skills
- Collaboration skills
- Self-assessment practice
14Description skills Unpacking a sample domain
- Observation
- Measurement
- Interpretation
- How do novices differ from experts?
- (a little audience participation would be
nice.)
15Observation
- Before training Observes behavior superficially
and recklessly - Basic (novice) Observes general patterns but
confuses observation and interpretation - Developing Distinguishes observation from
interpretation - Advanced (expert) Makes subtle, sensitive
observations - Professional (graduate) Sophisticated techniques
appropriate to circumstance
16Measurement
- Before training Uses measurement imprecisely and
in limited ways - Basic (novice) Needs direction to rely on
measurement but resists precision - Developing Uses measurement purposefully as
empirical strategy, complying with precision
demand - Advanced (expert) Actively pursues appropriate
instrumentation, reasoned measurement strategies - Professional (graduate) Strives to produce
optimal measurement strategy to reduce challenges
to validity of conclusions
17Interpretation
- Before training Relies on intuition to produce
obvious, simplistic conclusions - Basic (novice) Forms judgment with limited
regard to quality of evidence - Developing Selectively combines data-based
interpretation with personal experience - Advanced (expert) Relies on data for
systematically for more complex interpretation - Professional (graduate) Interprets behavior at
appropriate level of complexity, reflecting
context
18How would this approach be reflected in
psychology programs?
- Programs that emphasize coherent,
developmental focus - Course structures that include and promote CT
student learning outcomes - Faculty who give up covering the content in
service to cognitive goals
19Retention curves (Ericksen, 1983)
20Examples from introductory psychology
- The data page
- Two truths and a tale
- Quack like a duck
- Think and do homework
- The best exam ever
- Whats wrong with Emily?
21The data page
- What information will help you
- Personalize the class?
- Learn student names faster?
- Contact students when necessary?
- Teach statistics more effectively?
22Two truths and a tale UK style
- I have spent many hours on a Norton motorcycle.
- I have been kissed by a member of Monty Python.
- I cannot enjoy clotted cream due to
lactose intolerance. - Votes reveal hypothesis skills, overconfidence,
description skills.
23Quack like a duck (Hunter, 82)
- Clear your desks.
- Write with a pencil. Preferably 2.
- Take off your watch.
- Put your shoes under the seat.
- If youve written poetry in last week,
put your head down. - If youre Scottish, go to the back of the room
and face the wall.. - Put two fingers up your nose and quack
like a duck.
24Think and do page
- Each class requires a prep page.
- Questions based on reading
- Activities or puzzles related to material
- Could be an outline
- Graded on good faith effort for prep.
- Each prep counts for specific percent of grade.
25The best exam ever
- Now that you have studied the brain, perception,
sensation, etc., how do you manage to perform
your preferred leisure activity?
26(No Transcript)
27Rubric
- Shows reasonable depth of explanation
- Addresses all questions asked
- Relies on psychological concepts rather than
personal opinion - Demonstrates creativity
- Applies psychology concepts accurately to chosen
activity - Accurately self-assesses
28Whats Wrong with Emily?
- Class interviews faux famous client (class
graduate as Emily Dickinson). - Final exam involves description skills,
conceptualization, questioning, collaboration,
etc. - Outcomes
- Disagreement on diagnosis and treatment
(just like in professional life) - Demonstration that clinical work not as easy
as it looks on television - Students ask, Is it okay if we do more
research?
29(No Transcript)
30Rubric
- Describes behavior accurately and distinguishes
from inference - Answers all parts of exam
- Applies concepts (e.g., mental status) accurately
- Justifies conclusions
- Accurately self-assesses
31Key Success Elements
- Reward preparation
- Share air time
- Clarify performance expectation--gt write GREAT
rubrics - Require student self-assessment
- Pursue perfection
(or at least improvement)
32What American Psychological Association resources
support critical thinking focus?
- National standards for introductory psychology
- Guidelines/goals/outcomes for undergraduate
programs - Core competences for scientifically-minded
clinicians - Community college task force work
- Puget Sound conference
-
33Selected References
- Barr, R.B., Tagg, J. (1995). From teaching to
learning A new paradigm for undergraduate
education. Change, 27, 6, 12-25. - Dunn, D.S., Mehrotra, C.M., Halonen, J.S.
(2004). Measuring up Educational assessment
challenges and practices for psychology.
Washington, DC American Psychological
Association. - Ericksen, S.C. (1983). Private measures of good
teaching. Teaching of Psychology, 10, 133-136. - Hunter, W.J. (1982). Obedience to authority.
Activities resource handbook for psychology.
Washington, DC American Psychological
Association. - Mentkowski, M., Rogers, G., Doherty, A., Loacker,
G., Hart, J.R., Richards, W. et al. (2000).
Learning that lasts Integrating learning,
development, and performance in college and
beyond. San Francisco Jossey-Bass.
34How does it feel to be a novice?
35For follow-up
- jhalonen_at_uwf.edu
- I welcome conversations about teaching as a
respite from DeanLand
36(No Transcript)