Understanding income changes as they impact on children - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 22
About This Presentation
Title:

Understanding income changes as they impact on children

Description:

Understanding income changes as they impact on children. Inequalities ... University Auckland. s. ... Introduction of the Child Tax Credit, Lack of indexation ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:52
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 23
Provided by: drinne
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Understanding income changes as they impact on children


1
Understanding income changes as they impact on
children
  • Inequalities and Health Seminar
  • Dr Susan St John
  • Department of Economics
  • University Auckland
  • s.stjohn_at_auckland.ac.nz

2
Children below the unofficial poverty line (MSD,
The Social Report 2004)
3
Child poverty causes
  • The benefits cuts of 1991
  • Tax cuts of 1996
  • Introduction of the Child Tax Credit,
  • Lack of indexation of Family Support
  • The explosion in housing costs
  • Student loans and family debt
  • Casualisation of low wage employment
  • Social hazards such as drugs and gambling
  • Time-fractured nature of family living.
  • Invisibility of children

4
1991 Winter lecture
Winter Lecture 1991
5
Economic growth is not the answer
MSD 2003
6
Doubling since 1996
7
Measuring child poverty
8
2004 Budget
  • This is the biggest offensive in the war against
    poverty in decades
  • Helen Clark
  • Using a poverty value measure of 60 per cent of
    median household income there is expected to be a
    30 per cent reduction in child poverty by
    2007/08.
  • Budget 2004

9
Money isnt everything, but
  • Children need
  • Stable and secure housing
  • Sufficient income
  • Without this minimum, any family dysfunction
    cannot be addressed

10
Background to neglect
  • From Post war security
  • 1986 Family Support/ Family benefit
  • 1991 Family Support
  • 1996 Family Support and the Child Tax Credit

11
One child, two parent family on benefit
  • Maximum Family Support
  • 1986 42 a week
  • 47 a week
  • Needs to be 75 to have the same purchasing power

12
(No Transcript)
13
Work not welfare? The Child Tax Credit
  • Rewards independence from the state, not extra
    hours worked.
  • Complex
  • Difficult to administer.
  • Criteria are crude and discriminatory
  • Punishes children whose parents who lose their
    jobs.

14
Other countries do much better
  • UK universal child benefit
  • 16 for the eldest child
  • each other child 11.
  • Australia
  • Quasi-universal payment of A 21.00
  • Only 6 miss out and only when income is
    86,000-126,000.

15
Problems
  • Child-related payments are
  • too low
  • have not been adjusted for inflation
  • cut out from low income levels
  • are all related to income
  • Poor children are denied the Child Tax Credit
  • Work incentives not the answer to child poverty

16
Budget will help- eventually
For those on benefits
17
Outcome of 2004 Budget
  • Children in poverty must wait until next year
  • Substantial real gains for in work families
    from 2006
  • The poorest 250,000 children will still be poor
  • Inflation- proofing 2008

18
The price of the In Work Payment
  • high effective tax rates long income ranges
  • A 4-child family on over 38,000
  • Earns another 1000
  • tax 330.0
  • Loss of Family support 300.0
  • ACC 12.2
  • Student loan 100.0
  • Retains only 257.8

19
In Work Payment
  • Drives a large wedge between families on benefits
    and those in work
  • Focus is not child poverty
  • Purpose is to get parents off benefits

20
The In Work Payment
  • An impediment to child poverty reduction?
  • Better ways can be used to provide a work
    incentive
  • These may have better outcomes for poorest
    children

21
Why not the Australian approach?
  • EMTR problem is limited
  • Initial abatement down to universal 21 a week
    per child
  • Tax on first 6000 is zero
  • Part of family assistance abated against
    caregivers income
  • Abatement of family assistance reduced from 30
    to 20

22
Conclusion
  • There is real redistribution to working families
    by 2006/8
  • Those who fail to qualify for the IWP are left
    behind
  • Child poverty will remain severe
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com