Perspectives from two UK institutions - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 49
About This Presentation
Title:

Perspectives from two UK institutions

Description:

Don't ask questions you don't want to know the answer to ... it returns results that are blatantly incorrect, and others that don't match ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:42
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 50
Provided by: rcam9
Learn more at: https://www.libqual.org
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Perspectives from two UK institutions


1
Perspectives from two UK institutions
  • Stephen Town
  • University of York, UK
  • LibQUAL Exchange
  • Florence, 2009

2
Outline
  • LibQUAL and culture
  • LibQUAL at Cranfield
  • LibQUAL at York

3
Key issues for engagement action
  • Basic assumptions
  • Dont ask questions you dont want to know the
    answer to
  • Dont waste time seeking data on things you
    arent going to fix
  • Minimum cultural requirements
  • Willingness to listen
  • Ability to understand the data
  • Permission to act
  • Structure for action
  • Methodology for action

4
Cranfield University
5
Context and culture
  • DCMT Library part of a contract for education
    between University UK MoD
  • Quality paramount
  • Management leadership education
  • Formal quality initiative since 1993
  • Performance culture (and skills)
  • Supportive leadership and culture

6
Further analysis conducted at Cranfield
  • Campus library results
  • Results notebook recreated for each campus
    library
  • Results by discipline
  • Comparisons between PhD and Masters students
  • Exploring specific issues
  • Detailed analysis of comments (time consuming)
  • Longitudinal analysis
  • Internal benchmarking
  • External benchmarking
  • SCONUL ARL average
  • Peer-to-peer

7
Overall CU Results 2007
8
Two Campus Results from CU, 2007
9
DCMT Results 2007
10
DCMT Results 2007
11
Computer Science
Business Management
12
Making electronic resources accessible from my
home or office
13
Comments 2006
  • 205 Comments received overall
  • Results grouped by topic
  • Topics standardised year-on-year
  • Catalogued by
  • Dimension
  • Discipline
  • User group (Undergrad / Postgrad etc.)
  • Sex
  • Age

14
Comment Analysis
15
Highlighting Issues
16
Year-on-Year Change
17
Changes over the years
18
Internal Benchmarking
19
External Benchmarking
20
Peer-to-Peer Benchmarking
21
Actions Electronic Developments
  • Information skills training
  • Information Literacy outcomes received the lowest
    score in the 2003 survey
  • Action
  • New Information Literacy project to provide
    software based tutorial to help students with IL,
    specifically to aid our distance learners
  • Access to electronic resources
  • Our Web site and providing electronic access to
    resources were seen as major opportunities for
    improvement
  • Action
  • Developing a new library Web site, replacing 6
    static html pages with a portal.

22
New Web Site
  • From
  • To

23
Results of Actions Information Literacy
24
Results of Actions Access to electronic
resources
25
University of York
26
Context and culture
  • Large traditional Library
  • Broad and flat University structure
  • Progressive and excellent institution, but
    cautious
  • SCONUL survey every two years
  • Strong project management, but bureaucratic,
    hierarchic style with concerns about change

27
Summary of results
  • 990 responses (20 response rate)
  • 560 UG
  • 253 PG
  • 110 academic staff
  • Largest from History, English, Language and
    Linguistics and Politics.

28
Radar Graph University of York
29
Zones of Tolerance
30
Benchmarking
  • York is generally lowest or 2nd lowest across all
    aspects against seven chosen comparators (3 UK 4
    US)
  • Lowest in the group on information literacy
  • Results for academic staff are the worst in the
    group

31
Comparisons with 2004 results
  • Most significant improvements on
  • Space for group study and group learning
  • Readiness to respond to user enquiries
  • Giving users individual attention
  • Most significant decline on
  • Quiet space
  • Haven for study and learning
  • Printed library materials
  • Slight improvements on information literacy
    outcomes and general satisfaction

32
Undergraduate radar graph
33
Postgraduate radar graph
34
Academic radar graph
35
Comparison across user groups
36
Electronics radar graph
37
Electronics zones of tolerance
38
History radar graph
39
History zones of tolerance
40
Politics radar graph
41
Politics zones of tolerance
42
Comments on Information Control
  • The libcat website is difficult to find usable
    information. Frequently it returns results that
    are blatantly incorrect, and others that don't
    match the title I'm searching for. (Computer
    Science)
  • Access to online journals is difficult, needing
    to go through Athens and various portals to gain
    access, and not all journal resources are
    available. Making this available to off-campus
    users would be beneficial. (Considering my course
    length is 5 years, and I only have easy access to
    the library in my first year being on campus.
    While I've been off-campus for the majority of my
    course it makes using the library difficult. Most
    journals require access from the campus network,
    and this is problematic). (Computer Science)

43
Comments on Library as Place
  • Its often noisy and its an uninspiring location
    that doesnt make me want to remain in the
    Library to study (Medieval Studies)
  • There are areas of the library that are far too
    noisy. Often, it is only a few selfish students
    that cause the problem. Generally the RBL is
    reasonable. However there is a problem when
    groups of students work together on one table. I
    am aware that there are facilities for group
    study. However this seems to be ignored by
    students (Law)

44
Overview all users
  • Areas of greatest weakness
  • Printed library materials
  • Electronic information resources
  • Print and/or electronic journals
  • Library space that inspires study and learning
  • Quiet space
  • Haven for study, learning or research
  • Areas of greatest strength
  • Courteous staff
  • Readiness to respond to user enquiries.
  • Undergraduates are generally happier with the
    service than postgraduates and academics.

45
Action plan
  • Information content provision
  • Information Needs capital key texts, backfiles
  • DLPs, academic liaison marketing of resources
  • Process review
  • Opening hours
  • Web site virtual library
  • Library as Place
  • Open zone zoning
  • Longer term refurbishment CS building
  • Service
  • Greater consistency
  • Culture development
  • Leadership and management training development

46
University of YorkLibQUAL 2008 to 2009 trends
  • Superiority mean scores improved across all but
    one of the 22 core and 5 local questions
  • The other item remained constant
  • Discipline adequacy scores improved in all but
    six cases
  • Information control overall adequacy score moved
    from negative to positive
  • Substantial improvements in convenient service
    hours and online course support items (the latter
    also out of the red)

47
Engaging stakeholders
48
Conclusions
  • Communication
  • Comprehensive approach to stakeholder interests
  • engage all levels and external agents in actions
  • Competent programme, project and change
    management methods
  • Cultural development mechanisms
  • Measures direction
  • Values coherence
  • Boundary reduction

49
J. Stephen Town
  • Director of Information
  • University Librarian
  • University of York, UK
  • jst504_at_york.ac.uk
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com