Designing and Fabricating a Proton Beam Source Suitable for Fast Ignition Targets - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 16
About This Presentation
Title:

Designing and Fabricating a Proton Beam Source Suitable for Fast Ignition Targets

Description:

Designing and Fabricating a Proton Beam Source Suitable for Fast ... Total Energy in blob ~ 0.6 kJ. Backlit radiograph (8 keV) at imploded max rR. 457 m ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:155
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 17
Provided by: richards48
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Designing and Fabricating a Proton Beam Source Suitable for Fast Ignition Targets


1
Designing and Fabricating a Proton Beam Source
Suitable for Fast Ignition Targets
PERSISTENT SURVEILLANCE FOR PIPELINE PROTECTION
AND THREAT INTERDICTION
  • Richard B. Stephens
  • General Atomics

9th International Fast Ignition
Workshop Cambridge, MA 3 November 2006
ICFT/P2006-054
2
Contributors from a large collaboration
  • M Mauldin, E Giraldez,C Shearer
  • M Foord, A J MacKinnon, P Patel, R A
    Snavely, S C Wilks,
  • K Akli, F Beg, S Chen, H-K Chung, D J Clark,
    K Fournier, R R Freeman, J S Green, C D
    Gregory, P-M Gu, G Gregori, H Habara, S P
    Hatchett, D Hey, K Highbarger, J M Hill, J
    A King, R Kodama, J A Koch, K L Lancaster,
    C D Murphy,, H Nakamura, M
    Nakatsutsumi, P A Norreys, N Patel, J Pasley ,
    H-S Park, C Stoeckl, M Storm, M Tabak, M Tampo, W
    Theobold, K Tanaka, R Town, M S Wei, L
    van Woerkom, R Weber, T Yabuuchi, B Zhang
  • This work is from a US Fusion Energy Program
    Concept Exploration collaboration between LLNL,
    General Atomics, UC Davis, Ohio State and UCSD
  • International collaborations at RAL have enabled
    the experiments
  • Synergy with an LLNL Short Pulse ST Initiative
    has helped the work

3
Proton ignition concept has evolved
  • Initial concept avoided complexity
  • External focusing surface
  • Simple proton transport
  • Velocity spread cause problems
  • Energy must be delivered in short time
  • Simple solutions
  • Reduce energy spread (M. Hegelich, LANL)
  • Reduce separation
  • Introduce new problems
  • Protection from the imploding shell

Roth et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 436 (2001)
Atzeni et al., Nucl Fusion 42, L1 (2002)
4
Use a reentrant cone for protection
  • Protects proton source from coronal plasma
  • Limits accelerating surface
  • Causes focusing edge effects
  • Scatters proton beam

Laser
5
Tested concept by making prototype
  • Cone dimensions same as for electrons
  • 30 full cone opening
  • Focusing surface same as for hemi tests
  • (existing focal length data)
  • rc 170 mm
  • dfocus 290 mm
  • Limits accelerating area (125 mm dia)
  • Target Cu foil - 32 mm thick (29 mg/cm2)
  • Stops lt 4 MeV protons

6
Proton source area depends on energy
  • Accelerating electrons cool off as they travel to
    the edge

Patel et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 125004 (2003)
Hybrid PIC LSP simulation M. Foord - LLNL 100
fs, 50 mm FWHM Gaussian beam 45 J beam
  • 200 mm dia includes most useful protons (flat
    foil data)

Our source will have limited energy output
7
Low energy protons are most important to ignition
40
  • Protons must deliver energy in short time for
    ignition
  • limits useful proton energy range

Proton Deposition
Proton Energy MeV
300
30
Power TW
200
20
10
100
Sim parameters Proton spectrum Tp 3 MeV,
dn/deµsqrt(e)e-e/Tp Total proton energy 26 kJ
Proton beam radius 10 mm Source distance 4
mm Target density 400 g/cc
45
65
85
105
125
t ps
Temporal et al., Phys of Plasma 9 3098 (2002)
8
Protons are not easily scattered
  • The cone tip can be far from the compressed core
  • Scattering angle µ E-2
  • 3 Mev Protons 5
  • 15 Mev Protons 1
  • Broadens spot 5-10 mm

5 mm Au
1-5
15
200 mm
End wall scattering is insignificant
9
Prototype proton focusing cone was constructed
Construction is feasible
10
Initial tests show moderate proton focusing and
heating
11
Proton heating is reasonable for conditions
  • Ratio of HOPG intensities gives slope temp 1-4
    MeV for protons
  • Ka spots have 106 counts - to be compared to
    equivalent shots using full hemi
  • Focal spot is rather large - 160 mm
  • Could be consequence of side walls changing the
    proton focus.

12
Measure focus changes by radiographing grids
Put grids in flat washers for simpler
construction
  • Send proton beam through grid and detect with RCF
    stack
  • Magnification determines focus position,
    fuzziness of grid shows focus size, number of
    grids show source area
  • These experiments are in preparation

13
(No Transcript)
14
Will use data to design integrated experiments
for Omega EP
Omega EP hydro simulations (S. Hatchett)
Conversion to protons, focusing/ heating?
40 µm
457 µm
PW laser
vacuum
CD2
more compact?
Hi-Z mix?
improve effy?
Blob rR 0.44 g cm-2 ltrgt 120 g cm-3 ltTgt 0.4
keV Total Energy in blob 0.6 kJ
  • What is signature of heating, increased
    emission? Ka fluorescence? X-ray scattering?
    neutron production? Abs spectroscopy?

15
Laser spot size influences proton focus
  • The proton focal spot radius reduces as laser
    focal spot increases
  • Trade-off between fully illuminating surface,
    and building edge effect

16
Tight laser spot gives aberrated proton focus
X-ray phc image
Gekko PW data
Laser
Proton heating
PW laser
Cu Ka image
Cu Ka image
Cu Ka image
X-
RAL PW data

20mm heated spot
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com