WATER FOR INJECTION - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 24
About This Presentation
Title:

WATER FOR INJECTION

Description:

boiled water from a kettle. tap water. bottled water. other (please state) ... hierarchy of risks (boiled, tap etc.) - don't use same bottle for more than a day ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:3024
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 25
Provided by: nnef7
Category:
Tags: for | injection | water | boiled

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: WATER FOR INJECTION


1
WATER FOR INJECTION
  • ENGLISH WATER TORTURE?

2
BACKGROUND
  • August 2003 Section 9a amended, 5 items
    legalised
  • The Government will be laying a negative
    resolution statutory instrument to implement
    changes to section 9A of the Misuse of Drugs Act
    1971. With effect from 1 August 2003, it will no
    longer be an offence for doctors, pharmacists and
    drug workers to supply swabs, filters, sterile
    water, certain mixing utensils (e.g. spoons,
    bowls, cups and dishes) and citric acid to drug
    users who have obtained controlled drugs such as
    heroin and cocaine without a prescription

3
Their own words
  • Water, swabs, spoons, filters, citric
  • Not Vit C
  • (e) ampoules of water for injection, only when
    supplied or offered for supply in accordance with
    the Medicines Act 19684 and of any instrument
    which is in force thereunder
  • WFI still POM
  • In effect not water either

4
June 2005
  • "3A Persons employed or engaged in the provision
    of lawful drug treatment services.3A Ampoules of
    sterile water for injection containing not more
    than 2 mla of sterile water.3A The supply shall
    be only in the course of provision of lawful drug
    treatment services.".
  • a -"than 2 mg of sterile water." should read
    "than 2 ml of sterile water."

5
Naloxone
  • A SUMMARY OF THE COMMITTEE ON SAFETY OF MEDICINES
    MEETING HELD ON 11 MAY 2005
  • However, following discussions between the Agency
    and all parties, the NPSA had withdrawn their
    objections provided appropriate systems are
    introduced by ambulance trusts to ensure
    subsequent safe practice.

6
  • Spirit of law change is clearly to allow
    provision of all paraphernalia necessary in a
    comprehensive harm reducing needle exchange
  • Home Office Minister, Caroline Flint said
    "Providing these items is currently illegal. We
    know that treatment workers and doctors have been
    making sensible decisions to provide equipment
    anyway, but faced the risk of prosecution. We
    have decided to change the law to help reduce the
    health risks to drug users.

7
  • Pressure paid off, eventually
  • However, no plastic amp is currently available
  • Situation is actually worse, at least in south
    London
  • Why should this matter?
  • ''We have walked into shooting galleries and seen
    water that was actually pink with addicts'
    blood,''
  • Published December 24, 1989

8
We always have, so we always will
  • Needle Exchange Harm Reduction are pragmatic
    responses to continuing drug use
  • Focus on health BBV prevention/reduction as
    well as generally
  • SI amendments are in line with this
  • Research clearly shows need for increased NX
    provision

9
Breaking Glass
  • Assumptions glass amps inherently less safe than
    plastic?
  • Cuts could pose BBV risk
  • Users prefer plastic?
  • Do users really need water?
  • Wildlife may consume amps therefore plastic is
    safer than glass?

10
  • If assumptions are followed, technically we are
    left with no WFI to supply
  • PGD has been invalidated by intent of law changes
    to limit supply to 2ml
  • Although police may agree prosecution isnt in
    public interest MHRA consider this their
    jurisdiction
  • Interpretation locally has led to cessation of
    supply

11
Survey
  • Test assumptions In April 2006 the Mainliners
    outreach team distributed 1,000 2ml glass
    ampoules and
  • 100 safe snap amp snappers to injecting drug
    users as part of a pilot scheme to
  • evaluate the impact and response of the
    intervention.
  • Clients were surveyed at the time they were first
    given the ampoules
  • they were then followed up at subsequent visit
    and asked about their use of the
    ampoules/snappers
  • Mainliners had previously suspended supply of the
    5ml plastic ampoules following clarification from
    the MHRA of the legal position regarding supply
    in relation to the Medicines Act

12
  • PART 1 (if youve had glass amps before, please
    go straight to part 2)
  • 1. We havent been giving out water amps for a
    while what have you used in the meantime?
  • (Please tick all that apply)
  • boiled water from a kettle
  • tap water
  • bottled water
  • other (please state)
  • 2. Have you shared water in the last month? yes
    no
  • 3. Since we stopped supplying amps have you
    shared water
  • more often less often the same never
  • 4. Do you think youll use the amp snapper? yes
    no dont know
  • 5. Do you think mainliners supplying water amps
    will reduce water sharing amongst injectors?
  • yes no dont know

13
  • PART 2
  • If youve had glass water amps before
  • 1. Did you use the water amps? yes no
  • 2. How do you normally dispose of your amps?
  • 3. Have you shared water since you were given the
    amps? yes no
  • 4. Do you want water amps this time? yes no
  • 5. Did you use the amp snapper always sometimes
    never
  • 6. Did you (or anyone else) cut yourself with any
    of the amps? yes please give details no

14
  • Results do support assumptions, but not those
    supposed
  • what other sources of water have you used since
    Mainliners stopped supplying 5ml plastic
    ampoules?
  • boiled water from a kettle 0
  • tap water 11
  • bottled water 13
  • toilet water 2
  • puddle water 2

15
Sharing without amps
  • Shared in last month - 17 - said Yes, while
    just 6 said no
  • Shared since supply stopped - More often 16
  • the same 2
  • less often 0
  • never 5

16
Amps
  • Do you think youll use the amp snapper?
  • 22 said yes
  • none said no
  • 1 said dont know
  • Do you think that supplying water amps will
    reduce water sharing amongst injectors?
  • 22 yes
  • 1 no.

17
  • Did you use the water amps? 
  • yes 18
  • no 5
  • how did you dispose of the amps?
  • Sharps bin 13 
  • Domestic waste 8
  • Tin can 1

18
Sharing with amps
  • Do you think that supplying water amps will
    reduce water sharing amongst injectors?
  • 22 saying yes
  • just 1 no.
  • Have you shared water since you were given the
    amps?
  • 8 yes
  • 13 no
  • 9 of the 17 who had shared water in the previous
    month at first interview, said had not shared
    water since they were given the ampoules

19
Safety
  • did you use the amp snapper?
  • always 16 
  • sometimes 6
  • never 1
  • did you (or anyone else) cut themselves on the
    amps?
  • 100 NO!

20
  • Where next?
  • Supply of water is more than good practice
    plenty of research to show sharing message
    needs to be more than just syringes
  • Needle supply remains paramount, but of
    additional paraphernalia water supply is
    potentially next greatest hazard

21
From NIDA NOTES March/April 1997
  • The researchers used HIV's distinctive genetic
    structure, its DNA, as a marker to detect its
    presence in the injection paraphernalia. They
    found evidence of HIV DNA in up to 85 percent of
    contaminated needles collected from shooting
    galleries and in up to 36 percent of cotton
    swabs, 54 percent of cookers, and 67 percent of
    rinse water samples.

22
Where next
  • NEEDLE EXCHANGE WATER FOR INJECTION SUPPLY
  • This petition has been compiled by the Mainliners
    SMART Service user group with regards to the
    following concern. If you require any further
    information please do not hesitate to contact us
    on Tel 020 8677 9541 Fax 020 8664 6017. Our
    office is at 9b Mitcham Lane, Streatham, London,
    SW16 6LG
  • Water used for injecting is an integral part of
    Intravenous Drug Use. This means that users may
    resort to unhygienic and non-sterile practices to
    obtain water. Sterile injecting water has been
    available in the past, which is why we are now
    campaigning for its return. It is essential in
    Harm Reduction relating to reduce the risk and
    spread of Blood Borne Viruses.
  • Please register your concerns regarding this by
    signing the petition below. This petition will be
    brought to the attention of the National
    Treatment Agency as it is a very serious issue
    that needs to be addressed quickly, as well as
    locally to the funding bodies responsible
  • DateNameSignatureServiceOccupation(NFA)

23
Alternatives
  • Other WFI options - ? None of sufficient quality
  • Increased information on safe water use
  • - hierarchy of risks (boiled, tap etc.)
  • - dont use same bottle for more than a day
  • - always pour, never dip
  • - dont use communal glasses (rinsing or
    cooking)
  • - dont assume water is clean (or any
    paraphernalia)
  • - dispose of anything sharp responsibly
  • - DONT SHARE ANYTHING

24
Ignorance can be bliss
  • Whats the situation elsewhere?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com