Eclectism Shrinks Even Small Worlds - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Eclectism Shrinks Even Small Worlds

Description:

Cyril Gavoille (Univ. Bordeaux) Christophe Paul (Univ. Montpellier) Milgram's Experiment ... Letter transmitted via a chain of individuals related on a personal basis ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:53
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 19
Provided by: frai150
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Eclectism Shrinks Even Small Worlds


1
Eclectism Shrinks Even Small Worlds
  • Pierre Fraigniaud (CNRS, Univ. Paris Sud)
  • joint work with
  • Cyril Gavoille (Univ. Bordeaux)
  • Christophe Paul (Univ. Montpellier)

2
Milgrams Experiment
  • Source person s (e.g., in Wichita)
  • Target person t (e.g., in Cambridge)
  • Name, occupation, etc.
  • Letter transmitted via a chain of individuals
    related on a personal basis
  • Result The six degrees of separation

3
Formal support to the 6 degrees
  • Watts and Strogatz augmented graphs H(G,D)
  • Individuals as nodes of a graph G
  • Edges of G model relations between individuals
    deducible from their societal positions
  • D probabilistic distribution
  • Long links links added to G at random,
    according to D
  • Long links model relations between individuals
    that cannot be deduced from their societal
    positions

4
Kleinbergs model
  • d-dimensional meshes augmented
  • with d-harmonic links

u
prob(u?v) 1/dist(u,v)d
Exactly 1 long link per node
5
Greedy Routing
  • Source s (s1,s2,,sd)
  • Target t (t1,t2,,td)
  • Current node x selects, among its 2d1 neighbors,
    the closest to t in the mesh, y.
  • Action Node x sends to y.

6
Performances of Greedy Routing
Bball radius m/2
t
O(log n) expect. steps to enter B
x
O(log2n) expect. steps to reach t from s
distG(x,t)m
7
Limit of Kleinbergs model
  • d dimensions of the mesh
  • criterions for the search of t
  • Performances of greedy routing in
  • d-dimensional meshes O(log2n) expected steps
  • ? independent of criterions

8
Intermediate destination
André
Occupation
Geography
Mary
Robert
Alice
Marc
9
Awareness
x
Nx (x,v1),(x,v2),,(x,v2d)
10
Indirect-Greedy Routing
  • Two phases
  • Phase 1 Among all edges in Ax U Nx current node
    x picks e such that head(e) is closest to t in
    the mesh.
  • Phase 2 Current node x selects, among its 2d1
    neighbors, the closest to tail(e) in the mesh, y.
  • Action Node x sends to y.

11
Example
x
y
tail(e)
t
e
12
Convergence of Indirect Greedy Routing
  • Definition A system of awareness Au/u?V is
    monotone if for every u, for every e?Au-eu, the
    first node v on the greedy path from u to tail(e)
    satisfies e?Av.
  • Theorem IGR converges if and only if the system
    of awareness is monotone.
  • Example Au long links of the k closest
    neighbors of u in the mesh

13
Performances of IGR
Ball of k nodes Radius k1/d
t
m/r
m
u
14
Tradeoff
  • Large awareness
  • ? large expected steps to reach ID
  • ? small expected phases m ? m/r
  • Small awareness
  • ? small expected steps to reach ID
  • ? large expected ID before m?m/2

15
Case AuO(log n)
  • Theorem If every node is aware of the long links
    of its O(log n) closest neighbhors, then IGR
    performs in O(log11/dn) expected steps.
  • Proof
  • O(log1/dn) exp. steps to reach ID
  • O(log n) exp. steps m?m/2

16
Consequences
  • GR does not take criterions into account ?
    O(log2n) exp. steps
  • IGR takes criterions into account
  • ? O(log11/dn) exp. steps
  • Eclecticism shrinks even small worlds

17
AuO(log n) is optimal
Exp. steps
log2n
log11/dn
Size awareness
log n
logdn
18
Conclusion
c long-range links per node
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com