THE EFFECTIVENESS OF GOVERNING BODIES - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 17
About This Presentation
Title:

THE EFFECTIVENESS OF GOVERNING BODIES

Description:

THE COMBINED CODE OF CORPORATE GOVERNANCE - UK most recent ... Is the governing body adequately briefed on the views of academic staff on academic proposals? ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:148
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 18
Provided by: OECD4
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: THE EFFECTIVENESS OF GOVERNING BODIES


1
THE EFFECTIVENESS OF GOVERNING BODIES
  • Workshop Session
  • 25 August, 2006
  • Michael Kelleher

2
BACKGROUND 1
  • LEGAL STRUCTURES
  • 1968 EVENTS
  • IMPACT ON CONTINENTAL EUROPEAN
    UNIVERSITIES
  • STRONG REPRESENTATIVE MEMBERSHIP
  • ACADEMIC STAFF, STUDENTS, OTHER STAFF

3
BACKGROUND 2
  • MASSIVE GROWTH
  • INCREASED BUDGETS
  • ACCOUNTABILITY
  • COLLEGIALITY- SHARED GOVERNANCE
  • MANAGERIAL MODELS

4
BACKGROUND 3
  • SIZE OF GOVERNING BODY
  • INTERNAL/EXTERNAL MEMBERS
  • GENDER BALANCE
  • COMMERCIAL RISKS
  • GOVERNMENT INTERVENTION
  • LAY/EXTERTNAL MEMBERS

5
BACKGROUND 4
  • CORPORATE SCANDALS - ENRON etc
  • SARBANES-OXLEY ACT, USA (2002)
  • THE COMBINED CODE OF CORPORATE GOVERNANCE -
    UK most recent issue 2006
  • COMPARE UNIVERSITIES with CORPORATE SECTOR
  • MULTIPLICITY OF STAKEHOLDERS

6
MODERN GOVERNING BODIES 1
  • CHANGE
  • GUIDELINES
  • ASSOCIATION of GOVERNING BODIES - USA
  • COMMITTEE OF UNIVERSITY CHAIRMAN - UK
  • IRISH UNIVERSITIES ASSOCIATION

7
MODERN GOVERNING BODIES 2
  • AUSTRALIAN GOVERNMENT DEPT. OF SCIENCE AND
    TRAINING
  • GUIDELINES MAINLY VOLUNTARY
  • THREAT OF LEGAL IMPOSITION
  • INFLUENCE OF CORPORATE PRACTICES
  • EFFECTIVENESS OF GOVERNING BODIES

8
ASSESSMENT OF EFFECTIVENESS
  • MEMBERS
  • AGENDA
  • ACCOUNTABILITY
  • ADMINISTRATION

9
MEMBERS
  • Are members adequately informed?
  • Is role of governing body clearly understood by
    all, including members?
  • Is there induction for new members?
  • Does membership represent all skills/experience
    necessary
  • Are skills and knowledge of members regularly
    updated

10
MEMBERS 2
  • Is balance between internal and external/lay
    members optimal?
  • Is gender balance correct?
  • Is independence of governing body assured?

11
AGENDA 1
  • Does the governing body clearly understand the
    distinction between the roles of the executive
    and of the governing body?
  • Does the governing body operate strategically?
  • Is the governing body presented with clear
    choices by the executive?

12
AGENDA
  • Does the governing body interrogate the proposals
    from the executive?
  • Does the governing body contribute to the
    preparation of the strategic plan?
  • Is the strategic plan implementation monitored by
    the governing body

13
AGENDA 3
  • Is the governing body adequately briefed on the
    views of academic staff on academic proposals?
  • Is there a clear understanding of the sensitive
    balance between the responsibilities of the
    governing body and of the senior academic body
    (senate/academic council)?

14
ACCOUNTABILITY
  • Is the governing body clear as to its functions
    in overall financial governance?
  • Is the governing body adequately informed of
    (non-academic) financial risks?
  • Is the relationship between the governing body
    and its audit committee optimal?
  • Does the governing body satisfy itself that there
    is legal compliance (health and safety, taxation,
    employment law, procurement, estate management,
    charitable status, etc.)

15
ADMINISTRATION 1
  • How effectively are new members selected (where
    legally feasible)?
  • Does the governing body receive all required
    information in a timely manner?
  • Does the governing body examine the structure of
    the executive as to its appropriateness?

16
ADMINISTRATION 2
  • Does the governing body review the role of its
    secretary and ensure the independence of that
    office?
  • Does the governing body examine the functioning
    of its sub-committees and the contributions which
    individual members make to the university?

17
CONCLUSION
  • DOES THE GOVERNING BODY CARRY OUT A REGULAR
    REVIEW OF ITS OWN EFFECTIVENESS AND OF THAT OF
    ITS MEMBERS, ON THE BASIS OF THE FOREGOING
    ISSSUES, OR OTHERWISE
  • DOES THE GOVERNING BODY MAINTAIN CONTACT WITH THE
    UNIVERSITYS STAKEHOLDERS students, staff,
    local and national/international business, local
    and national government, funding agencies for
    teaching and research, benefactors, teaching
    hospitals, church authorities, schools, other
    colleges and universities, etc.
  • DOES THE GOVERNING BODY CARRY OUT ITS FUNCTIONS
    IN THE CONTEXT OF THE FACT THAT THERE IS NO
    BUSINESS LIKE UNIVERSITY BUSINESS. (Larsson,
    Allan Keynote Address 24 August, 2006)
  • End.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com