Fair Premiums, Insurability of Risk and Contractual Provisions - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 22
About This Presentation
Title:

Fair Premiums, Insurability of Risk and Contractual Provisions

Description:

The premium level that is just sufficient to fund the insurer's expected costs ... Suppose a liability claim longs for 3 years. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:249
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 23
Provided by: busi231
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Fair Premiums, Insurability of Risk and Contractual Provisions


1
Fair Premiums, Insurability of Risk and
Contractual Provisions
  • Fair Insurance Premiums
  • What limit the insurability of risk
  • Contractual provisions
  • Legal Doctrines

2
Insurance Costs and Fair Premiums
  • Fair premium
  • The premium level that is just sufficient to fund
    the insurers expected costs and provide
    insurance company owners with a fair return on
    their investment. It includes
  • Expected claim costs
  • Investment income
  • Administrative costs
  • Fair profit loading

3
Claim tail and present value
  • The lag between the time that coverage is sold
    and claims are paid is known as the claim tail.
  • It affects expected losses

4
Example
  • Suppose a liability claim longs for 3 years. In
    the first year, the loss amount on average is
    700. In the second year, the loss amount is
    200. the loss amount is 100 in the third year.
    Interest rate is 5. What is the expected loss?

5
Premium loadings
  • Two Bicycles one worth 200 and the other worth
    6000. Assume that the probability of each bike
    being stolen is 0.05. Assume that the fixed costs
    of paying employees to market, underwrite, and
    process an application for bike insurance are
    100 and that capital costs are 0. ignoring
    investment income, what are the fair premiums for
    both?

6
Moral Hazard
  • If you purchase a full-coverage theft insurance,
    will you still take precautions to reduce the
    likelihood of theft?

7
Conditions for Moral Hazard
  • Two conditions cause moral hazard
  • Expected losses depend on insureds behavior
  • Effect of behavior on expected losses is costly
    to observe and measure
  • Example
  • Claim costs increase with driving speed
  • Costly for insurers to monitor driving speed

8
Adverse Selection
  • If insurer is unable to distinguish between the
    two types of consumers with different risk level
    and thus change them the same premium, what will
    happen?

9
Factors Limiting the Insurability of Risk
10
Deductibles
  • Example
  • policy with a 500 deductible
  • then policyholder pays first 500 of losses
  • Types of deductibles
  • per occurrence
  • aggregate

11
Deductibles and Claim Processing Costs
  • Deductibles reduce cost of processing small
    claims
  • Example
  • Fixed claim processing cost of 200
  • 2000 with probability 0.01
  • Loss 100 with probability 0.10
  • 0 with probability 0.89
  • Expected claim cost w/o a deductible ______
  • Expected claim cost w a 100 deductible ______
  • Marginal cost of insuring the 100 loss equals
    _______

12
Deductibles, Moral Hazard, and Adverse Selection
  • Deductibles reduce moral hazard why?
  • Deductibles might be used to reduce adverse
    selection. How?

13
Coinsurance
  • With coinsurance, insured pays a proportion (the
    coinsurance rate) of any loss
  • Example Insured pays 20 of all medical costs
  • Reason for coinsurance provisions
  • Insureds demand less than full insurance when the
    policy has a loading
  • Reduce moral hazard

14
Policy Limits
  • A policy limit is the maximum amount that the
    insurer will pay
  • Liability insurance always has a policy limit
  • Property insurance often has a policy limit

15
Purpose of Policy Limits
  • Reduce classification costs when consumers have
    information that is costly for insurers to obtain
  • Example
  • Homeowners policy might limit coverage for
    jewelry losses to 2,500
  • Those with more expensive jewelry buy special
    coverage
  • Insurer does not have to investigate the value of
    each policyholders jewelry

16
Pro Rata and Excess Coverage Clauses
  • Issue How is coverage divided when multiple
    policies apply to the same loss
  • Pro rata clause divide in proportion to amount
    of coverage
  • Excess clause one policy pays losses in excess
    of the other policys limit
  • Why have these clauses?
  • prevent coverage in excess of loss, which would
    cause moral hazard

17
Exclusions
  • Policies exclude coverage for some types of
    losses
  • Why?
  • reduce administrative costs
  • reduce capital costs
  • reduce moral hazard
  • reduce adverse selection

18
Indemnity versus Valued Contracts
  • Indemnity contract - insurer pays based on the
    amount of loss that occurred
  • Example auto physical damage
  • Valued contract - insurer pays a pre-determined
    amount
  • Example life insurance

19
Indemnity versus Valued Contracts
  • Type of contract is largely explained by
  • The costs of assessing value when the amount of
    loss can be assessed at low cost following the
    loss, more likely to have indemnity contracts
  • Moral hazard when moral hazard is less likely to
    be a problem, fixing the insurance payment before
    a loss can avoid costly haggling following a loss
    (e.g., life insurance)

20
Insurance-to-Value in Property Insurance
  • Also called coinsurance
  • Specifies the percentage of the propertys value
    that must be insured to receive full
    reimbursement in the event of a loss
  • Typical coinsurance percentage is 80

21
Legal Doctrines
  • Indemnity principle an insurance policy cannot
    pay more than the financial loss suffered.
  • Insurable interest if you want to get paid from
    insurance company, you got to have interest.
  • Example, A and B are not related, A buys a life
    insurance and set B as the beneficiary
  • Subrogation after a party receives claim payment
    from an insurer, it has to transfer the right to
    seek additional compensation to the insurer

22
Legal Doctrines
  • Utmost good faith
  • Misrepresentation (page 195)
  • Concealment (196)
  • Contract of adhesion
  • Favors insureds, if disagreement
  • Doctrine of reasonable expectation
  • Policies would be interpreted based on the
    expectation of a person who is trained in the
    law.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com