Title: Seasonal Hydroclimate Variability over North America: Global and Regional Reanalyses Faulty Evapotra
1Seasonal Hydroclimate Variability over North
AmericaGlobal and Regional Reanalyses Faulty
Evapotranspiration
- Alfredo Ruiz-Barradas
- Sumant Nigam
Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic
Science University of Maryland
CPPA 2008 PIs Meeting
Silver Spring, MD September 29-October 1
September 30, 2008
2Data Sets
- Global Reanalyses NCEP/NCAR
- ERA-40
- JRA-25
- Regional Reanalysis NARR
- Other data sets GSWP-2 (multi-model mean,
global) - VIC (US optimized)
- UNH/GRDC (Fekete
et al. 2002) - US-MEX
- Period 1979-1999
3The Beginning An interannual precipitation
variability analysis NARR
J, J, A GPP Index Regressions
Precipitation JJA Standard Deviation
MFC gt ET in reanalyses. High expectations on NARR
Box (100º-90ºW,35º-45ºN) defines Great
Plains Precipitation (GPP) Index
Region is at the center of the Discussion of
local vs remote forcing of precipitation
variability.
CI0.3 mm/day
4Atmospheric Water Balance (1979-1999)
Area-average over the Great Plains (100ºW-90ºW,35
º-45ºN)
Is ET large in NARR?
5Atmospheric Water Balance (1979-1999)
Is ET large in NARR? It is comparable
to NCEP/NCAR Larger than ERA-40 JRA-25 VIC
Residual NARR
Yes, ET seems to be large From the AWB point of
view.
6Comparison with Rasmusson (1968 MWR, 96,
720-734) over Central Plains and Eastern US
regions
(110º-80ºW,30º-50ºN)
From Rasmusson, E. (1968 MWR, 96, 720-734)
7Terrestrial Water Balance NARR (1979-1999)
Annual mean Background Annual cycle Dials
P-E Runoff
8River Discharge
Composite Runoff constrained by spatially
distributed river discharge
NARR
Annual mean runoff in NARR is smaller than the
observationally constrained product
This implies that annual mean P E is
underestimated or
E is overestimated because
P is
very well assimilated in NARR
9The Terrestrial Water Balance in Global Reanalyses
P-E Runoff
Driest
Wettest
10The Terrestrial Water Balance in Offline
Land-Sfc. Models
P-E Runoff
Runoff in VIC and UNH/GRDC products have a
similar structure in the annual mean
This supports the idea that Runoff (E) is
underestimated (overestimated) in NARR
11P-E
Winter
Runoff
In NARR P-E ?ws/?t
P-E
Summer
Runoff
12Area-average over the Great Plains (100ºW-90ºW,35
º-45ºN)
- Seasonal imbalances in NARR from spring to fall
are due to the highlighted errors in runoff and
evaporation. - JRA-25 has the largest seasonal imbalances,
although its annual - imbalance is comparable to that
- in ERA-40 and 1/2 of that in NCEP/NCAR.
- Seasonal imbalances in JRA-25
- are due to overestimation in
- P - E, the change in water storage, and runoff as
well as the almost nonexistent annual cycle in P
- E. - ERA-40 has larger imbalances
- from spring to fall due to the
- small and almost uniform change
- in water storage during those
- seasons.
13It is known that
Noah, the LSM in NARR, had a large positive bias
in summer evaporation over regions of non-sparse
vegetation cover, such as the eastern US, and
that the bias was related to canopy resistance
parameters in the model (Mitchell et al
2005 http//www.emc.ncep.noaa.gov/gc_wmb/Document
ation/TPBoct05/T382.TPB.FINAL.htm). Upgrades to
the Noah model, including the correction of the
evaporation bias, were implemented in middle
2005, almost two years after the completion of
NARR at the end of 2003.
Conclusions
- It is clear that reanalyses have some problems in
reproducing the terrestrial water cycle over
North America, particularly the global products.
The most recent global reanalysis, the Japanese
reanalysis, does not improve the representation
of the climatological features of the terrestrial
water cycle over North America. - The regional reanalysis NARR severely
overestimates evaporation (and the change in
water storage) that leads to the underestimation
of runoff. Is the problem fix in its LSM? - In any case, these results make clear the need
for a correction in the assimilation process in
NARR in which some observational constraints on
the land-surface part are needed to generate
realistic hydroclimate fields.