Educational Technology - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 52
About This Presentation
Title:

Educational Technology

Description:

The institution offering correspondence courses must be The University of Texas ... Schools overestimated enrollment. and ease of establishing. online programs. 25 ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:91
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 53
Provided by: agiv
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Educational Technology


1
The Texas Education Agencys Electronic Course
Pilot and Distance Learning Update
  • Educational Technology
  • Curriculum Division
  • Texas Education Agency
  • January 2005

2
In the beginning
  • There were correspondence courses
  • And it was good.

3
Then there were distance learning courses
  • instructional television,
  • satellite,
  • two-way videoconferencing,
  • Internet
  • and blended technologies
  • And it was even better!

4
TAC 74.23
  • Correspondence Courses
  • and Distance Learning
  • Credit toward state
  • graduation requirements
  • may be granted under the
  • following conditions

5
TAC 74.23
  • Correspondence Courses-
  • The institution offering correspondence courses
    must be The University of Texas at Austin, Texas
    Tech University, or another public institution of
    higher
  • education approved by the
  • commissioner of education

6
TAC 74.23
  • Distance Learning-
  • Students may earn course credit through distance
    learning technologies, such as, but not limited
    to, satellite, Internet, two-way
    videoconferencing, and
  • instructional television

7
TAC 74.23
  • The correspondence courses and distance learning
    courses must include the essential knowledge and
    skills as specified in Ch. 74.1 (relating to the
    Essential Knowledge and Skills) for such a course.

8
State Policy- Summary
  • Correspondence Courses-
  • Must be through
  • UT, Austin or
  • Texas Tech

9
State Policy- Summary
  • Distance Learning Courses-
  • Schools may grant state credit toward graduation
    as long as they have determined, to their
    satisfaction, that a course meets or exceeds the
    Texas Essential Knowledge
  • and Skills.

10
Providers and Resources
  • Course Providers
  • School districts
  • Education Service Centers
  • Higher Education
  • Non-Profits
  • For-profit vendors

11
(No Transcript)
12
(No Transcript)
13
(No Transcript)
14
PEIMS
  • Its VERY IMPORTANT to
  • Code all correspondence courses and
  • distance learning courses
  • in PEIMS.

15
PEIMS Distance Learning Codes
  • Satellite
  • Instructional Television Fixed Service (ITFS)
  • Videoconferencing
  • Internet
  • Variety of above in
  • combination with Internet

16
PEIMS Distance Learning Indicator Code
  • PEIMS Data Standards- Code Table C167
  • www.tea.state.tx.us/peims/standards

17
  • Be sure your PEIMS coordinator
  • knows that all distance
  • learning courses must be
  • coded in PEIMS!!!

18
Statewide online learning pilot programs
  • Virtual School Pilot (VSP)
  • Investigating the Quality of Online Courses (IQ)
    Pilot

19
Virtual Schools Pilot (VSP)
  • Established by SB 975
  • Implemented 2001-2003, ending Aug. 31, 2003
  • Focused on restrictions impacting schools
    offering electronic courses to middle and high
    school
  • Included students who were
  • not physically present for all
  • or part of these courses.

20
VSP
  • Allowed TEA to
  • Examine electronic courses as viable educational
    alternative
  • Study methods of tracking/verifying student
    participation in online courses
  • Test three funding models other than current
    attendance accounting
  • model based on seat time in
  • a traditional classroom

21
Investigating the Quality of Online Courses (IQ)
Pilot
  • IQ Pilot
  • Established quality of service guidelines for
    online courses to provide assurance to the state
    and to schools that courses meeting the
    guidelines will be of the highest quality and be
  • aligned with state
  • curriculum standards.

22
What weve learned so far
  • Online courses meet various needs of
    diverse student populations
  • Courses not offered locally
  • Shortage of certified teachers in content area
  • Very few students need to take a specific course
  • Additional courses for
  • schedule flexibility

23
What weve learned so far
  • Option for students with different family, work
    and learning needs
  • Accelerated study
  • Credit Recovery
  • Alternative opportunity
  • Allows schools to offer courses required for
    Recommended High
  • School Graduation Plan

24
What weve learned so far
  • Increased parental involvement
  • Increased interaction with students in some cases
  • Students underestimated work required in online
    courses
  • Schools overestimated enrollment
  • and ease of establishing
  • online programs

25
What weve learned so far
  • Online teachers need specialized training
  • Schools need time to plan and implement virtual
    programs

26
What weve learned so far
  • Requests for online courses continue to increase
  • Online courses not readily available to all
    students
  • Online courses not for all students
  • Online courses not for all teachers

27
Online Course Evaluation Matrix
  • As a result of the IQ Pilot-
  • Online course evaluation tool for school
    administrators, teachers, parents and course
    providers to use for reviewing courses delivered
    over the Internet
  • the Quality of Service
  • Online Course
  • Evaluation Matrix

28
(No Transcript)
29
Quality of Service Guidelines for Online Courses
  • I. Course Components
  • Course Design
  • Course Content
  • Instructional strategies and activities
  • Learning community
  • Student assessments
  • Technology integration
  • Course effectiveness

30
Quality of Service Guidelines for Online Courses
  • II. Support
  • Technical support
  • Student/parent services
  • Administrative reports
  • Professional development

31
Quality of Service Guidelines for Online Courses
  • III. Financial Components
  • Economics
  • Company background
  • Intellectual property
  • Marketing

32
  • Quality of Service Guidelines for Online Courses
    www.iqstandards.info
  • 2002 report to Legislature Electronic Courses and
    Virtual Learning Programs
  • www.tea.state.tx.us/.

33
Current Status
  • Growing interest in online courses
  • Most students take one or two at a time
  • State needs to explore alternative funding
    mechanisms for public school students taking
    online course while not on campus and to look at
    ways
  • to allow virtual and traditional
  • classes to be combined for
  • state funding.

34
Whats new?
  • Electronic Course Pilot (eCP)
  • Established by Senate Bill 1108
  • Builds on the lessons learned through two
    previous pilot programs
  • The Virtual Schools Pilot (VSP)
  • The Investigating the Quality of
  • Online Courses (IQ) Pilot

35
Electronic Course Pilot
  • Calls for Commissioner to establish a new program
    to
  • examine state policies, requirements and
    restrictions impacting school districts that
    offer students enrolled in the district an
    electronic educational program or course that
    includes use of the Internet or other electronic
    media in which the
  • student and a teacher are in
  • different locations for a
  • majority of the students
  • instructional period.

36
Pilot must result in information and
recommendations that address these three critical
questions
  • 1. Does online delivery of courses work
    educationally?
  • 2. What is the appropriate level of state funding
    for online courses?
  • 3. How can the state sufficiently monitor online
    courses? (Audit financially,
    collect/track PEIMS data, assure
    student assessment is appropriate,
    reliable and administered correctly)

37
Funding
  • No funding provided through SB 1108 to implement
    the program
  • Commissioner given authority to charge districts
    a fee
  • eCP is not a grant program!
  • State may fund participating districts up to but
    not to exceed the full
  • equivalent funding that would have
  • been received in regular classroom
  • attendance

38
Electronic Course Pilot
  • eCP Terms of Participation
  • and application released
  • Dec. 6, 2004 via TEA website
  • 15-20 applicants to be selected for participation
  • Applicants to propose funding
  • model and method to equate
  • funding model to current method
  • of funding via ADA

39
Funding Models
  • Applicants will propose one or more
  • funding models.
  • Each model must include a detailed, observable
    and measurable method describing
  • how student participation and progress will be
    monitored and verified and
  • How student participation
  • will translate (equate) to
  • states current system of ADA

40
Electronic Course Pilot
  • This equated funding method will serve
  • as the students attendance for purposes of
    calculating state funding

41
Electronic Course Pilot
  • Public school districts and charter schools are
    eligible to apply to participate
  • Participating districts to be eligible for
  • ADA funding up to 100 ADA
  • Selected participants may begin their programs
    this spring through
  • Aug. 31, 2005

42
Electronic Course Pilot
  • School districts and open enrollment charters may
    include in the eCP
  • Grades 3-12 Texas public school students who are
  • enrolled in their school and
  • reside within their district boundaries
  • or the existing open-enrollment
  • charter geographic service
  • area boundaries, and

43
Electronic Course Pilot
  • whom they are already authorized to serve
    according to state law
  • unless there is a written agreement with the
    students home district (ISD of residence)

44
Benefits of participation in eCP
  • Potential to earn additional state funding for
    public school students not currently earning ADA
    or earning less than full ADA
  • Add to knowledge about online learning
  • Impact policy and the future
  • of online learning in Texas

45
For more information
46
(No Transcript)
47
  • If your school is currently offering electronic
    courses or prepared to begin offering courses
  • Or, if you are interested in participating next
    year

48
eCP Application
  • Visit our website at www.tea.state.tx.us.
  • Hot Topics Electronic Course Pilot
  • Letter to Administrator
    Addressed
  • Attachments at bottom of letter link to
  • eCP Terms of Participation
  • eCP Application forms and directions
  • DEADLINE 500 p.m. CST
  • February 14, 2005

49
Questions or Comments
  • Send questions or comments to eCP mailbox at
  • ecp_at_tea.state.tx.us

50
Future of online learning in Texas?
  • TEA to make recommendations to Legislature based
    on eCP
  • Dec. 2006
  • New legislation this session
  • ???

51
Survey
  • Ask you to complete the survey today
  • Request your input on virtual learning programs
    at your school
  • Need your feedback to inform policy and increase
    support for high-quality online learning in
    Texas.

52
Now available on the TEA website
  • Progress Report on the
  • Long-Range Plan for Technology
  • www.tea.state.tx.us
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com