Halo formation in Linacs - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 34
About This Presentation
Title:

Halo formation in Linacs

Description:

... 3, hx=.65, hz=.49) m=1.1, m=1.2, m=1.3, m=1.4. Dependence of halo ... (c/a=3, m=1.6, hz=.87) t=250, t=350, t=450, t=550. Halo structure low density cut ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:57
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 35
Provided by: ValuedGate1570
Category:
Tags: formation | halo | linacs

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Halo formation in Linacs


1
Halo formation in Linacs
  • A.V. Fedotov and R.L. Gluckstern

ORNL/SNS Workshop June 25-26, 2001
2
Acknowledgments
  • This work summarizes studies of beam halo done at
    DSAT group at University of Maryland (1997-99).
  • Halo studies were driven by the APT project at
    LANL.
  • The studies were done together with
    R. Ryne and S. Kurennoy (LANL).
  • Collaborators T. Wangler, J. Barnard, S.
    Lund, J. Qiang, N. Pichoff.

3
Definition of Beam Halo
  • ICFA Workshop on Beam Halo (Wisconsin 1999)
  • In general, one refers to HALO as long as there
    are tails outside the beam core.
  • Halo extent can be of any size still HALO
  • Definition of Halo as particles outside several
    sigmas is not good.
  • Definition is NOT important
  • What really matters is the source of halo
  • Parametric Halo (P.H.) parametric resonance
    between individual
    particles collective modes
  • P.H. is believed to be an important source of
    halo in Linacs
  • P.H. may exist in circular machines. Its
    existence will be strongly machine dependent
    not necessarily the main source of halo

4
Parametric Halo
Uniform density

Q depressed tune m mismatch parameter k -
space-charge perveance a beam radius p
frequency of beam oscillations
  • Key mechanism parametric resonance
  • The dominant resonance (21) p2Q

5
P.H. Transverse (phase space)
Typical stroboscopic plot in the transverse phase
space for 125 particles with low angular
momenta for a KV beam. (tune depression
0.8) (mismatch parameter 0.7)
6
P.H. 2D 3D
  • 2D
  • Analytic studies for a KV beam were found to
    give excellent agreement with corresponding
    computer simulations which were then extended to
    other 2D distributions.
  • The location of P.H. radius gave some
    confidence that a beam pipe wall could be placed
    far enough from the beam to avoid intercepting
    the halo particles.
  • 3D
  • Attention then shifted to short 3D beam
    bunches of ellipsoidal shape with c/a
    length/width ratio in the range 2 - 4.
  • Both transverse and longitudinal modes were
    capable of generating P.H.

7
P.H. - Longitudinal
The signature of the longitudinal halo was the
same as that of the transverse halo (a peanut
diagram in the phase-space projection). The
transverse and longitudinal mismatch and tune
depression parameter space was extensively
explored with numerical simulations.
8
P.H. - Longitudinal (phase space)
Phase-space diagram of a longitudinal
halo. (c/a3, hx.65, hz.49, mz1.4)
9
Longitudinal halo extent for different
mismatches (tune depression dependence)
10
Longitudinal halo extent for different beam sizes
(tune depression dependence)
11
Dependence of halo intensity on mismatch
(c/a3, hx.65, hz.49) m1.1, m1.2, m1.3,
m1.4
12
Dependence of halo intensity on tune depression
(c/a3, m1.2) hz0.87, hz0.65, hz0.49,
hz0.32
13
Dependence of halo onset on mismatch
(c/a3, hx.65, hz.49) m1.1, m1.2, m1.3,
m1.4
14
Dependence of halo onset on tune depression
(c/a3, m1.2) a) hx0.79, hz0.65 b) hx0.65,
hz0.49 c) hx0.53,
hz0.39 d) hx0.45, hz0.32
15
Low tune depression region dependence
onmismatch
(c/a3, hx.93, hz.87, t900) m1.2, m1.3,
m1.4, m1.6
16
Time evolution
(c/a3, m1.6, hz.87) t250, t350, t450, t550
17
Halo structure low density cut
a) no cut b) with low density cut allowed to
study onset of various order resonances and halo
structure
18
Main features halo extent
  • Transverse Longitudinal
  • An important quantity is the ratio of the
    halo radius to that of the matched distribution
  • Halo extent primarily governed by mismatch
  • Small dependence on tune depression does exist
    (different for KV and non-uniform distributions).
  • Longitudinal halo
  • In addition to features similar to transverse
    halo, there is significant increase of halo
    extent for severe tune depressions

19
Extent of transverse halo
Extent of the transverse halo for the 6D
stationary distribution
20
Extent of longitudinal halo
Extent of the longitudinal halo for the 6D
stationary distribution
21
Extent of longitudinal halo non stationary
distributions
Extent of the longitudinal halo for the 6D
uniform distribution
22
Halo extent
  • Halo extent is minimized by matching control
  • Transverse halo extent is larger than that of
    longitudinal halo
  • For very large mismatch parameter
  • Transverse (xmax/xrms) can be as big as 5 8.
  • Longitudinal (zmax/zrms) can be as big as 4
    6.
  • Non-uniform distributions largest extent
  • Gaussian largest extent
  • No mismatch threshold on halo formation for
    non-uniform distributions.

23
Halo intensity
  • Transverse and Longitudinal
  • Strong dependence on mismatch
  • Very weak dependence on tune depression (except
    for a very severe tune depression, below 0.5).

24
Halo onset
  • Strong dependence on tune depression
  • For elongated bunches Longitudinal Halo develops
    earlier than Transverse since longitudinal tune
    is more depressed than transverse.
  • Strong dependence on mismatch parameter

25
Coupling effect stationary distribution
Coupling effect for the 6D stationary
distribution with zero transverse mismatch and
50 longitudinal mismatch (c/a2, hz.45, hx.55)
26
Coupling effect uniform distribution
Coupling effect for the 6D uniform distribution
with zero transverse mismatch and 50
longitudinal mismatch (c/a2, hz.45, hx.55)
27
Coupling effect Gaussian distribution
Coupling effect for the 6D Gaussian distribution
with zero transverse mismatch and 50
longitudinal mismatch (c/a2, hz.45, hx.55)
28
Coupling halo extent
  • Mismatch in one direction leads to both
    longitudinal and transverse halo.
  • With relatively small mismatch in all directions
    one can get noticeable halo.
  • Coupling effect becomes important for almost
    spherical beam with c/a
  • Example Beam (c/a2) is perfectly matched
    transversely but has strong mismatch
    longitudinally - quick transverse halo and
    significant beam loss if beam pipe acceptance is
    not big enough.

29
Other issues
  • Loss from the RF bucket due to longitudinal halo
    stabilization of P.H. by non-linear RF.
  • Loss from RF bucket could not be a problem.
    However, careful longitudinal matching is
    necessary to minimize impact on transverse halo
    when coupling is important.
  • Periodic focusing channel apart from the
    instabilities due to the structure driven
    resonances, a close resemblance to the
    continuous focusing channel results.

30
Coulomb scattering halo extent
  • Some numerical studies suggested that small angle
    single Coulomb scattering may not be negligible
    in high-intensity linacs
  • Because of the importance of this question of
    high-intensity linacs under design, rigorous
    treatment of this effect was required.
  • Self consistent 3D distribution was used to
    estimate the extent and rate of halo formation
    analytically.
  • N. Pichoff numerical simulations for
    non-stationary distributions.
  • Shell thickness/extent around the beam
    (populated due to scattering) depends on tune
    depression and could be significant even for
    matched equipartitioned beams. When the beam is
    nonequipartitioned or the beam with stationary
    distribution is rms mismatched, halo extent can
    be big and comparable to the one of the
    Parametric Halo.

31
Coulomb scattering - rate
  • Rate of this process was estimates for various
    stationary f(H0-H)n and non-stationary
    (N. Pichoff) distributions.
  • Simple expression in terms of beam parameters
    were obtained for various n
  • For typical beam parameters (APT) the
    fraction of ions which leaves the beam per unit
    length
  • Relatively singular distribution n-1/2 -
    10-11/km
  • Distribution with n0
    - 10-14/km
  • Distributions with n 0
    - 10-15/km

  • Conclusion
  • Effect of Coulomb collisions on halo
    development in high-current ion
    linear accelerators is not important.

32
Practical Note
  • Parametric Halo is a resonant mechanism
  • Thus at least few betatron oscillation (depressed
    by space charge) are required. As result, this
    mechanism is more applicable for transport
    systems with sufficient/large number of zero
    current betatron periods. Large - will depend on
    tune depression and mismatch parameter from 100s
    to just a few.
  • One has to check how phase advance is changing
    along the system length and whether this change
    is adiabatic enough to support the resonant
    mechanism.

33
Parametric Halo in Linacs Rings
  • Difference of halo formation between linacs and
    rings
  • Linacs P.H. could be an important source of
    halo
  • Rings 1. P.H. is possible should be studied
    for each individual machine
  • 2. Machine resonances
  • Modest mismatches
  • P.H. (Linac) strong tune depressions - very
    quick development
  • P.H. (Rings) low tune depression very slow
    development
  • In Rings Rate of P.H. development is the most
    important question.

34
Summary
  • Development of parametric halo in ideal Linacs is
    well understood. Developed models in conjunction
    with multiparticle simulations give confidence in
    predictions of halo formation.
  • Predictions applications to real accelerators
    are being tested in LEDA experiment.
  • If developed P.H. could be the largest source
    of halo formation in Linacs since it can lead to
    a large emittance increase.
  • An important question to understand is formation
    of Parametric Halo in the vicinity of
    space-charge coupling resonances (I. Hofmann et
    al.).
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com