Title: Virtual Reference Service: Our RealTime Experience
1Virtual Reference Service Our Real-Time
Experience
- Leela Balraj and Tom Klingler
- Kent State University
2Abstract
Today's college students are conducting much of
their academic research outside the physical
confines of the traditional library building,
using networked connections in labs, residence
halls, apartments, and homes. This convenience
has its drawbacks, particularly in terms of
obtaining traditional reference assistance.
Students anywhere can still benefit from the
guidance that reference librarians are able to
provide in retrieving relevant, accurate, and
authoritative information. One new initiative at
Kent State University is to provide virtual
reference service to students at remote locations
using real-time videoconferencing. This session
will discuss the practical as well as the
technical aspects of our experiences.
3Our setting Desktop H 323
4Shared windows
5More shared windows
6Underway
7Background
- Student Retention Initiative grant proposal
- 1. Director, Information Services
- Coordinator, Reference Services
- Dean, Honors College
- 2. Promote reference service
8Background
- Reaching out to off-site users
- "Reference work includes the direct,
personal aid within a library to persons in
search of information for whatever purpose, and
also various library activities especially aimed
at making information as easily available as
possible." - -Margaret Hutchins, Introduction to Reference
Work (1944) - 1. Traditional off-site reference service
Telephone Email - 2. Recent off-site reference service Chat
Video/Audio - real-time conferencing 24/7
9Background
- Pilot target group Honors College students
- 1. Good working relationships
- 2. Attractive environment - library resource
room computer lab dorms - 3. Appropriate networking
- 4. Meet information needs - individual honors
work senior honors thesis/project
10Our serviceRefLINK
- Spring 2001 Introduction of service staff
training - 1. Introduce service Open House
- 2. 'Name The Service' survey - RefLINK
- 3. Training - team teaching observation group
instruction
11Our serviceRefLINK
- Summer 2001 Pilot project with McNair Scholars
students - 1. Propose support for new service
- 2. Establish working relationship with
students - 3. Demonstrate service
- 4. Get feedback formal informal
- 5. Keep lines of communication open
12Our serviceRefLINK
- Fall 2001 Honors College students
- 1. 'Food For Thought' lecture series
- 2. Advertise service - Daily Kent Stater
flyers - 3. Promote service - Student reporter
13An incoming call
14Would you answer this one?!
15Shared whiteboard
16E-boredom
17Two-way whiteboard
18Danger! Video zoom.
19Service issues
- Training
- 1. Team teaching
- 2. Group instruction
- 3. Observation
20Service issues
- Staffing
- 1. Librarians
- 2. Graduate Reference Assistants (library
science students) - 3. Library Associates (future)
-
21Service issues
- Real-time experiences
- 1. Types of interactions - in-depth research
topics ready reference citation verification - 2. Problems encountered - technical glitches
- 3. Lessons learned - learning curve user
acceptance -
22Service issues
- Promotion
- 1. Daily Kent Stater campus newspaper
articles - 2. Flyers in Honors College bulletin board and
computer lab -
23Future
- 1. Expand to other locations on campus -
computer labs dorms branch libraries campus
help desk regional campuses distance education
- 2. Expand hours of service - meet needs of
students - 3. Technology advancements
-
24The technology
- Supports high-quality video and audio
- Can be used with collaboration tools
- a. shared whiteboard
- b. shared browser
- 3. Point-to-point or multipoint
- 4. H 323 is the protocol standard for video
conferencing-over-IP
25Advantages of H 323
- 1. No ISDN line charges
- 2. Informal use by anyone anytime on a
desktop PC - 3. Less need for expensive special rooms and
advance reservations - 4. Cheap a typical PC can be upgraded to a
good quality videoconferencing station for
900.00
26H 323 v. H 32x
- 1. H 320 for ISDN
- 2. H 321 for ATM
- 3. H 322 for lans with QoS
- 4. H 323 for IP
-
27Whats needed
- 1. TCP/IP network
- 2. Switched port is nice
- 3. High-end PC
- 4. An H 323 kit
- 5. MCU gateway for multipoint conferences (and
multi-protocol)
28Whats in a kit?
- 1. Software
- 2. Specialized video card
- 3. Camera
- 4. Microphone
29Some products
30Products
- Teleportec
http//www.teleportec.com/
31Products
32Products
- a VCON model for small groups
33Products
- Metropark Supernova
- http//www.metropark.com/
34Our VCON model
35Some settings
36More settings
37Tricky technical issues
- 1. Shared resolution
- 2. Feedback
- 3. Application sharing
38More Products
- 1. Zydacron comCenter Conferencing Room System
- http//picturephone.com/products/comcenterroomsy
stem.htm - 2. PictureTel 960 970 Videoconferencing Systems
- http//picturephone.com/products/picturetel_9
60_970.htm - 3. Polycom ViewStation H.323
- http//picturephone.com/products/polycom_vie
wstation_h323.htm
39Gateways and gatekeepers
- 1. Multi-protocol
- Between H323 (IP,) H320(ISDN,)
- H321 (ATM)
- 2. Multi-point
- More than two participants
- 3. MCU Multipoint Control/Conferencing Unit
40Gateway products
- 1. First Virtual
- http//www.fvc.com/products/vgate.htm
- 2. Cisco
- http//www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/pcat/vc350
0.htm - 3. Radvision
- http//www.radvision.com/f_products/f1_overview.ph
p3?prodProducts2BOverview
41Basics of H 323
- 1. University of Illinois at Chicago
- http//www.uic.edu/depts/accc/newsletter/adn30/tec
htip.html - 2. Synetrix
- http//www.synetrix.co.uk/technologies/video/video
_conferencing.htm - 3. IMTC (International Multimedia
Telecommunications Consortium ) - http//www.imtc.org/h323.htm
42Bibliography
Broughton, K. M. (2001). Our experiment in
online, real-time reference. Computers in
Libraries, 21 (4), 26-31. Janes, J., et.al.
(1999). Digital reference services in academic
libraries. Reference User Services Quarterly,
39 (2), 145-150. Kasowitz, A., et.al. (2000).
Quality standards for digital reference
consortia. Reference User Services Quarterly,
39 (4), 355-363. Kenney, B. J. (2001).
Academic libraries test Web-based reference.
Library Journal, 126 (12), 25. Lankes, R. D.
et. al. (Eds.). (2000). Digital reference
service in the new millennium Planning,
management, and evaluation. New York
Neal-Schuman.
43Bibliographycontinued
- Lipow, A. G. (1998). Reference service in a
digital age. Reference User - Services Quarterly, 38 (1), 47-48.
- Meola, M. Stormont, S. (2000). Real-time
reference service for the - remote user From the telephone and electronic
mail to Internet chat, - instant messaging, and collaborative software.
The Reference Librarian, - no. 67-68, 29-40.
-
- Oder, N. (2001). The shape of e-reference.
Library Journal, 126 (2), 46-49. - Schneider, K. G. (2000). The distributed
librarian Live, online, real-time - reference. American Libraries, 31 (10), 64.
44Bibliographycontinued
-
- Sloan, B. (2001). Ready for reference Academic
libraries offer live web-based - reference Preliminary report. Retrieved October
15, 2001 on the World - Wide Web http//www.lis.uiuc.edu/b-sloan/ready4
ref.htm -
- Tenopir, C. (2001). Virtual reference services
in a real world. Library - Journal, 126 (12), 38-40.
-
- Weissman, S. (2001). Considering a launch?
Library Journal, 126 (2), 49. -
- Wolf, L. C. (1999). Multimedia applications in
heterogeneous - Internet/ATM environments. Internet Research
Electronic Networking - Applications and Policy, 9 (1), 49-57.
45Contact info
- Virtual Reference Service Our Real-time
Experience at Kent - State University
- Leela Balraj Tom Klingler
- Information Services Librarian Assistant Dean for
Systems - Reference Dept. Kent State University
- Kent State University P.O. Box 5190
- P.O. Box 5190 Kent, OH 44242
- Kent, OH 44242 Voice 330-672-1646
- Voice 330-672-1657 Fax 330-672-4811
- Fax 330-672-3964 Email tk_at_kent.edu
- Email lbalraj_at_lms.kent.edu
46Thanks
- http//www.library.kent.edu/tk/h323.ppt