Surface%20Seal%20Reduction%20Using%20Anionic%20Polyacrylamide%20(PAM) - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Surface%20Seal%20Reduction%20Using%20Anionic%20Polyacrylamide%20(PAM)

Description:

Surface Seal Reduction Using Anionic Polyacrylamide PAM – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:363
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 56
Provided by: clarkjg
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Surface%20Seal%20Reduction%20Using%20Anionic%20Polyacrylamide%20(PAM)


1
Surface Seal Reduction Using Anionic
Polyacrylamide (PAM)
Soil, Environmental Atmospheric Sciences
  • Sang Soo Lee
  • MS Candidate
  • Advisor Dr. C.J. Gantzer

University of Missouri
2
Overview
  • Introduction
  • Objectives
  • Methods Materials
  • Expected Results

3
Definition of Surface Sealing
  • The deposition by water, orientation and/or
    packing of a thin layer of fine soil particles on
    the immediate surface of the soil, greatly
    reducing its water permeability.

4
Definition of Surface Sealing
  • A seal is a nonuniform layer situated at the soil
    surface.
  • It results from compaction and rearrangement of
    the soil particles in the disturbed upper zone
    due to the raindrop impact, and from fine soil
    particles percolating in-depth during
    infiltration.

5
Rationale
  • Rainfall-induced soil surface sealing can reduce
    infiltration rate by 10 to 100 times compared to
    an unsealed soil.
  • (McIntyre, 1958)

6
Rationale
7
PAM - Sealing Soil Erosion
8
Rationale
  • Rainfall-induced soil surface sealing can have
    severe detrimental agricultural effects.
  • By reducing infiltration, rainfall recharge is
    usually reduced, lowering the potential available
    water needed for plant growth and development.

9
Rationale
  • Rainfall-induced soil surface sealing can have
    detrimental hydrological, and environmental
    effects.
  • By reducing infiltration, surface runoff
    increases. This is usually accompanied with
    accelerated erosion and nonpoint source pollution
    transported to streams reducing water quality.

10
The History of PAM
1948 Research started to find a synthetic soil
conditioner 1951 Krilium manufactured Too costly
for widespread use.
11
What is PAM?
  • Depiction of an individual acrylamide monomer as
    found in a polyacrylamide molecule.
  • cf R. Sojka USDA-ARS

12
Polyacrylamide (PAM)
PAM increases soil cohesion enhances the
aggregates by binding particles together
13
Calcium and Anionic Polyacylamide Monomer Effect
on the diffuse Double Layer
  • Ca in the water shrinks the diffuse electrical
    double layer surrounding soil particles (having a
    net negative charge) and bridge the anionic
    surfaces of soil particles and PAM molecules,
    enhancing flocculation of individual soil
    particles. (cf Wallace and Wallace, 1996)

14
PAM Use
  • PAM formulations for use in irrigated agriculture
    are water soluble anionic polymers with typical
    molecular weights of 12 to 15 Mg mole-1 and gt1.5
    x 106 monomer units/molecule). ( Lentz et al.
    2000)
  • Anionic PAM, used in soil systems, are reported
    to have low toxicity to macrofauna, edaphic
    microorganisms, or crop species (Barvenik, 1994
    Kay-Shoemake et al., 1998).

15
Why is PAM of Interest?
  • Results from research with PAM show
  • Effective erosion control
  • Sustained water infiltration rates
  • Reduce soil surface sealing

16
PAM Enhances Flocculation
Effect of PAM on turbidity after PAM
application vs. Control (no PAM).
17
  • Illustration of the effectiveness of PAM for
    furrow irrigation. cf Bob Sojka - USDA-ARS

18
Objective
  • Apply the theory for predicting Saturated
    Hydraulic Conductivity (Ksat) of sealed soils
    presented in Rainfall-Induced Soil Surface
    Sealing A Critical Review of Observations,
    Conceptual Models, and Solutions by Assouline,
    (2004. Vadose Zone Journal 357059).
  • Using this theory, evaluate and document the
    benefits of PAM by studying changes in soil
    properties using x-ray CT and standard laboratory
    measurements.

19
Materials and Methods
  • Ksat
  • CT (X-ray Computer Tomography)
  • Theory of Assoulines (2004)
  • Experiment Design
  • Soil Samples Preparation

20
Saturated Hydraulic Conductivity Ksat Darcy's law
  • The proportionality factor in Darcy's law as
    applied to the viscous flow of water in soil,
    i.e., the flux of water per unit gradient of
    hydraulic potential.

21
Darcy's law
  • Flow of water through saturated porous media.The
    law is
  • K Q L / (H A T)
  • where,
  • Q is the volume of water mm3,
  • A is the area of the bed, mm2
  • L is sample thickness mm,
  • H is the head of water on top of the sample, mm
    and
  • K is the Hydraulic Conductivity and is dependent
    on the nature of the soil. mm hr-1

cf Brady
22
  • Measurement of Ksat

23
Measurement of Ksat
24
Measurement of Ksat
25
Ultra-High X-ray Computed Tomography (CT)
  • High-resolution X-ray computed tomography (CT) is
    a new technology well suited to a range of soil
    investigations. It is a quick and nondestructive
    method to produce images that correspond closely
    to serial sections through an soil core.

26
Ultra-High X-ray Computed Tomography (CT)
  • Visualization of CT data typically profits from
    the ability to view oriented sections through the
    three-dimensional volume represented by the data,
    and from the capability to selectively extract
    and measure features of interest.

27
CT (X-ray Computed Tomography)
  • X-ray CT of soil surface seals formed from
    raindrop impact is being used to create 3-D
    volume rendered images to characterize the
    surface seal.

28
  • CT data collection systems

29
CT (X-ray Computer Tomography)
30
An Example of a 2-D Scan of a Intact Soil Core
  • A slice of a 76mm by 5mm thick intact Mexico
    series soil core collected from a no-tillage
    plot. After Gantzer and Anderson, 2002.

31
An Example of a 3-D Scan of a Intact Soil Core
  • A volume rendering of a 76mm by 5mm thick intact
    Mexico series soil core collected from a
    no-tillage plot. cf Gantzer and Anderson, 2002.

32
A 2-D Scan of an Intact Soil Core of a Soil
Surface Seal
  • CT scan of a 40 mm dia. Mexico soil surface seal
    cf Gantzer, 2005

33
A 3-D Scan Surface Plot of Density of an Intact
Soil Core of a Soil Surface Seal
  • CT scan of a 40 mm dia. Mexico soil surface seal
    cf Gantzer, 2005

34
Theory of Flow Through Seal
  • The seal bulk density, (?c), is the highest at
    the surface and decreases exponentially with
    depth, (h), to that of the undisturbed soil.

35
Theory of Flow Through Seal
  • ?c(h) ? ??0exp(-?h) h-Z 1
  • where
  • ?c is the bulk density
  • h is the depth
  • Z is the depth taken positive upward,
  • ??0 is the maximum change in bulk density at the
    soil surface (h0), and
  • ? is a characteristic parameter of the soil
    rainfall interaction.
  • Mualem and Assouline (1989).

36
Theory of Flow Through Seal
  • Ruth (1997) suggested that a sigmoidal function
    would be better for describing the density
    profile since, once the maximum compaction at the
    surface has been attained, further drop impact
    would likely induce increased compaction at
    increasing depth.
  • ?c(h) ? ??0/(1avhv)(1-1/v) 2
  • where
  • a and v are constants related to the
    soil-rainfall system.

37
Theory of Flow Through Seal
  • The exponential model of Mualem and Assouline
    (1989) can be extended to include the case where
    maximum compaction extends in-depth. The
    mathematical expression of this
  • ?c(h) ? ??0exp(-ßhn) 3
  • Where
  • ß and n are constants related to the
    soil-rainfall system.
  • It is flexible enough to fit both the exponential
    (Eq.1) and sigmoidal models (Eq.2).

38
Theory of Flow Through Seal
  • The modeled distribution with depth of the bulk
    density within the seal layer according to a)
    exponential (Eq.1) and b) sigmoidal models
    models compared with the experimental data of a
    sandy silt (Roth, 1997) and b) a silt loam soil.
    cf Assouline, 2004.

39
Theory of Flow Through Seal
Fitted parameters from Eqs. 1 2 3 for the
sandy silt and the silt loam soils density data
of Roth (1997).
40
Theory of Flow Through Seal
  • Water retention a) and hydraulic conductivity b)
    simulated with model 3 of at different depths
    within the seal layer for the Atwood soil. After
    S. Assouline 2004.

41
Theory of Flow Through Seal
  • Distribution with depth and time of the ?c
    simulated by the model 3 for the Sharon sandy
    loam.

42
Theory of Flow Through Seal
  • Distribution with depth and time of the Ksat of
    the seal simulated by model 3 of for a Sharon
    sandy loam.

43
Theory of Flow Through Seal
  • The goal of my work is to apply the theory for
    predicting Ksat of sealed soils
  • Use this theory, to evaluate and document the
    benefits of PAM by studying changes in soil
    properties using x-ray CT and standard laboratory
    measurements.

44
Experiment Design
  • Sets of six repacked Mexico silt loam 150 mm i.d
    soil cores soil cores, equilibrated to -3.5 kPa
    water potential will be used to produce surface
    seals for scanned using a ultra-high CT scanner
    located at the University of Texas-Austin.
  • Twelve soil cores (diameter 6 inchs, depth 6
    inchs) scans were taken in each core at 10-mm
    spacings.

45
Soil
  • MEXICO SERIES
  • The Mexico series consists of very deep, somewhat
    poorly drained, very slowly permeable soils
    formed in loess or loess and pedisediment. These
    soils are on uplands and have slopes of 1-5.
  • TAXONOMIC CLASS Fine, smectitic, mesic Aeric
    Vertic Epiaqualfs

46
Soil
47
Soil
  • Mexico soils from Bradford Research Farm in Boone
    County, Missouri will be studied.
  • Mexico soils are sensitive to surface sealing,
    and highly erodible (Revised Universal Soil Loss
    Equation soil erodibility is 0.43, among the
    highest in the county).

48
Soil
  • Disturbed soils will be collected and air-dried.
  • Soils will be sieved to pass a 4-mm sieve.
  • Soil will be packed into soil cylinders to an
    average ?b of 1.3 Mg m-3.

49
Experiment Design
  • Twelve soil cores will be subjected to simulated
    rainfall at 55 mm/hr using the rainfall
    simulator of Regmi and Thompson, (2000).
  • Samples will be subjected to 0-, 7.5-, 15-, 30-,
    and 60-min of rainfall after which seal will be
    collected for scanning.
  • Replicate samples treated in the same fashion
    will be evaluated for measurement of Ksat.

50
Rainfall Simulation
  • A paired set eight 150 mm i.d soil sample for
    seal formation prior to and after rainfall
    application.

51
Seal Sampling
52
Expected Results
  • To confirm the precision of the new theory of
    water flow through soil surface seal.
  • To determine the usefulness of ultra-high
    resolution x-ray computer tomography in measuring
    surface seals.

53
Expected Results
  • To evaluate various rates of surface-applied PAM
    on surface sealing, water infiltration, and soil
    erosion.
  • To explain why PAM solutions reduce soil surface
    sealing.

54
Questions
55
(No Transcript)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com