Ian Rodgers - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 9
About This Presentation
Title:

Ian Rodgers

Description:

Minimise state interference in markets, allowing the most competitive firms to thrive. Requires consistency of approach across the whole of the EU. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:46
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 10
Provided by: glo62
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Ian Rodgers


1
Globalisation, financial crisis, innovation and
climate change challenges for a modern State aid
policy
Ian Rodgers Chairman, BUSINESSEUROPE State Aid
Working Group Director, UK Steel
2
State aid general principles
  • Minimise state interference in markets, allowing
    the most competitive firms to thrive.
  • Requires consistency of approach across the whole
    of the EU.
  • But rules must be clear and predictable for
    companies
  • And transparent in their application.

3
State aid and globalisation - 1
  • Europe should not attempt to use aid to compete
    with low cost economies, apart from
  • Rescue restructuring aid
  • Regional investment aid
  • Focus on skills base and innovation.

4
State aid and globalisation - 2
  • The EU should make full use of WTO rules to
    discipline overseas subsidies and other
    market-distorting practices.
  • DDA should have been an opportunity to improve
    their application.
  • Write additional disciplines into future FTAs.

5
The financial crisis
  • A return to worldwide subsidisation and
    protectionism would prolong the crisis.
  • The EU has an opportunity to lead by example.
  • Communication on aid to financial institutions
    strikes the right balance
  • Art. 87(3)(b) invocation is justified
  • Impacts on competitors are minimised
  • Rapidity of response applauded.

6
State aid and innovation
  • 2006 Framework is an improvement.
  • But serious concerns that some aspects will deter
    RD funding, particularly
  • Detailed assessment, and requirement for
    counter-factual incentive effect analysis.
  • Rigid categorisation of types of RD.
  • Shortcomings perpetuated in block exemption
    Regulation.

7
State aid and climate change
  • New guidelines expand the scope for encouraging
    investment in, and operation of, carbon-efficient
    technologies
  • Negative incentive test is repeated.
  • Positive distortions of competition through
    energy savings are prevented.
  • CCS correctly to be considered later.

8
State aid and the EU Emissions Trading Scheme
post-2012
  • The draft Directive as published by the
    Commission could drive energy-intensive
    manufacturing out of the EU.
  • Amendments to correct this are opposed by DG
    Competition because of their perceived
    relationship with competition/state aid policy.
  • However, neither articles 81 to 86 nor articles
    87 to 89 are applicable.

9
Conclusion
  • The EUs unique state aid rules are a vital
    component of a vigorous and enterprise-oriented
    single market.
  • We welcome
  • The process of continuous appraisal and
    improvement
  • The Commissions openness to input from
    stakeholders.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com