Title: OMB Circulars A21, A110
1OMB Circulars A-21, A-110 A-133
- Presented by Caroline McMullin, Stuart Taub, and
Edward Kiewra - Office of Sponsored Programs Syracuse University
2Credits go to -
- Julie Norris formerly at MIT
- Jane Younger at University of Texas Health
Science Center at San Antonio - Ann Holmes from the University of Maryland
- Materials from NCURA 46th annual meeting
3Overview OMB Circulars
- Difference between award types grants,
contracts and cooperative agreements - Purpose of the circulars
- What circulars are we reviewing?
4Definition of a Grant
- Purpose is to transfer money, property, services
or anything of value to recipient in order to
accomplish a public purpose - No substantial involvement anticipated between
government and recipient
5Definition of a Cooperative Agreement
- Purpose is to transfer money, property, services
or anything of value to recipient in order to
accomplish a public purpose - Substantial involvement anticipated between
government and recipient
6Definition of a Contract
- Purpose is to acquire property or services for
direct benefit or use of the Federal Government. - Very restrictive
- Usually no expectation of cost sharing
7Assistance Vs. Procurement
- Assistance generally, what the proposer wants
to do. Awards can be either grants or
cooperative agreements - Procurement generally, what the government buys
(can include research). Awards are contracts
8OMB Circulars
- Purpose To give instructions to the federal
agencies affected by the circulars federal
agencies are required to implement. - Federal agencies pass the requirements to
institutions - Effect Set minimum standards for institutions
9OMB Circulars applicable to all Awards
- A-21 Cost Principles for Educational
Institutions - A-110 Grants and Agreements with Institutions
of Higher Education Uniform Administrative
Requirements - A-133 Audits of States, Local Governments,
and Non-Profit Organizations
10Definitions
- Definition of cost is
-
- An amount paid or required in payment for a
purchase a price - The expenditure of something, such as time or
labor, necessary for the attainment of a goal
11Definitions
- Definition of principle is
-
- A rule or standard
- A fixed or predetermined policy or mode of action
12Definitions
- Cost Principles can be defined as the policy for
determining if the cost or expenditure is
allowable or not.
13OMB Circular A-21 Cost Principles for
Educational Institutions
- Purpose Establishes principles for determining
costs applicable to grants, contracts, and other
agreements with educational institutions - Determines what costs can be included in the FA
calculation - Remember A-21 addresses both direct and FA
(indirect) costs as well as specific allowable
costs (Section J)
14A-21 Constantly Changes
- Tighten rules on allowability and allocation of
costs - Primary focus on Facilities Administrative
Costs - Promote greater standardization in treatment of
costs - Also directed primarily at Facilities
Administrative Costs
15How is Allowability Determined?
- Allowable Under the agreement, regulations and
public laws - Reasonable A prudent person would have purchased
this item and paid this price - Allocable They can be assigned to the activity
on some reasonable basis - Consistently Treated Like costs must be treated
the same in like circumstances, as either direct
or FA costs - If a cost cannot meet the above criteria, it is
NOT ALLOWABLE, no matter what it is for.
16Unallowable Costs Section J(Can not be charged
against Federal agreement, used as cost sharing
or placed in the FA cost base)
- Unallowable Activities
- (something you do)
- Lobbying
- General public relations alumni activities
- Student Activities
- Managing Investments solely to enhance income
- Unallowable Objects (something you buy, a line
item) - Advertising
- Alcoholic beverages
- Entertainment
- Fines penalties
- Moving Costs if employee resigns within twelve
months - Certain recruitment costs
17A-21 Revisions, July, 1993
- The salaries of administrative and clerical
staff should normally be treated as indirect
costs. Direct charging of these costs may be
appropriate where a major project or activity
explicitly budgets for administrative or clerical
services and individuals involved can be
specifically identified with the project of
activity. Items such as office supplies, and
memberships shall normally be treated as indirect
costs. F.6.b.
18Cost Principles
- The fact that a cost requested in a budget is
awarded, as requested, does not ensure a
determination of allowability. The organization
is responsible for presenting costs consistently
and must not include costs associated with their
FA rate as direct costs.
19Direct and Facilities and Administrative Costs
- Direct Costs Costs which can be identified
specifically with a particular sponsored project
or that can be directly assigned to such
activities relatively easily with a high degree
of accuracy - Facilities Administrative Costs incurred for
common or joint objectives and therefore cannot
be identified readily and specifically with a
sponsored project
20Examples of Direct Costs
- Salaries and Wages
- Fringe Benefits
- Travel
- Lab Supplies
- Subgrants and Subcontracts
21FA Costs are Real
- Any research project must cover two components
of costs - those directly attributed to the project
- those incurred for the general support and
management of the research - If the sponsor of research projects do not fully
reimburse the costs, they must be paid from other
institutional funds. - American Council on Education
22FA Cost Pools
- Operations and Maintenance
- Library
- General Administration
- Departmental Administration
- Sponsored Projects Administration
- Student Services Administration
23Consistency is a Problem
- Consistency in estimating, accumulating and
reporting costs - Consistency in allocating costs incurred for the
same purpose - Should be able to compare proposal estimate with
actual costs for any significant cost
24OMB Circular A-110Uniform Administrative
Requirements
- Purpose
- Subpart A General
- Subpart B Pre-Award Requirements
- Subpart C Post-Award Requirements
- Subpart D After-the-Award Requirements
25A-110 Purpose
- Sets forth standards for obtaining consistency
and uniformity among Federal agencies in the
administration of grants to and agreements with
institutions of higher education
26OMB A-110 Sections
- Subpart A General
- Purpose
- Definitions
- Effect on other issues
- Deviations
- Subawards
27OMB A-110 Sections
- Subpart B- Pre-Award Requirements
- Pre-award policies
- Forms for applying for Federal assistance
- Special award conditions
- Certifications and representations
- Debarment and suspension
- Lobbying
28OMB A-110 Sections
- Subpart C Post Award Requirements
- Financial and Program Management
- Standards for financial management systems
- Payment
- Cost sharing or matching
- Program income
- Revision of budget and program plans
- Allowable costs
- Period of availability of funds
29OMB A-110 Sections
- Subpart D After-the-Award Requirements
- Close-out procedures
- Subsequent adjustments and continuing
responsibilities - Collections of amount due
- Appendix A- Contract Provisions
30Aspects of A-110
- Effect on Issues
- No agency can impose rules that are in conflict
with A-110 - Deviation
- OMB can grant exceptions in unusual circumstances
- Subcontracts
- A-110 applies to any subcontractors performing
work under an award
31OMB Circular A-110Uniform Administrative
Requirements
- Expanded Authorities under OMB A-110 C.25e
- Agencies can waive cost-related and
administrative prior approvals - University Sponsored Project Offices can approve
- Pre-award costs (up to 90 days prior to award
start date) - First no-cost extension up to 12 months
- Carry forward of balance
32Whats Important for Me as a Departmental
Administrator?
- Cost Sharing
- Program Income
- Revision of Budget and Program Plans
33Cost Sharing
- Verifiable and not included as contributions on
Federal projects - Still have to be allowable
- Provided for in the approved budget when
required by the Federal Awarding agency - Unrecovered indirect costs may be included with
prior approval of Federal awarding agency
34Revision of Budget Program Plans
- Instructions on how to report deviations from
budget and program plans - Changes which require sponsor prior approval
- Change in scope
- Need for additional Federal funds
- Change in key person specified in the application
or award document - The absence for more than three months, or a 25
percent reduction in time devoted to the project,
by the approved project director or principal
investigator
35Revision of Budget Program Plans, contd.
- The transfer of amounts budgeted for indirect
costs to absorb increases in direct costs , or
vice versa, if required by the Federal awarding
agency. - The transfer of funds allotted for training
allowances (direct payment to trainees) to other
categories of expense. - Unless described in the application and funded in
the approved awards, the subaward, transfer or
contracting out of any work under the award. Does
not apply to purchase of Materials supplies,
equipment or general support services.
36OMB Circular A-133
- Establishes audit requirements and defines
federal responsibilities for implementation and
monitoring such requirements for institutions of
higher education - Institutions receiving more than 500K in Federal
Awards require an audit - Audits shall normally be performed annually
37A-133 Emphasis
- Sets standards for audit consistency and
uniformity - Identifies compliance requirements
- Establishes criteria for testing internal
controls - Tests for reasonable assurance that financial
statements are accurate
38Audits
- Question When do you start preparing for an
audit? - Answer The day you prepare a proposal
39Who Audits the University?
- Federal Government US Dept. of Education is
Syracuses cognizant audit agency - A-133 Auditors
- Program Auditors
40Key to a Successful Audit
- Organized Files
- Documentation for expenses
- Appropriate Approvals
- Audit Trails (i.e., documentation)
- Knowledge of policies and regulations
- If its not documented, it didnt happen.
41Audits
- Document! Document! Document!
- When transfers are required Defend the Debit
- Auditors want to know why the award was charged
for the expense
42A Look at Accusations
- George Washington University Engineering
professor charged with embezzling almost 600,000
in federal grants by directing the money into his
own private companies. Also charged with using
University money to pay his cousins wife for
work that she never did. The court case is still
pending. Article taken from the Chronicle of
Higher Education, 2/4/05
43A Look at Accusations
- University of Connecticut engineering professor
resigned his tenured position after being accused
of spending thousands of hours on his private
consulting practice and neglecting his academic
work. - Florida Atlantic University professor resigned
following accusations that he used state money to
give an edge to a company that he had created to
make and sell the same mine-detecting submarine
that he was studying at the university.
44A Look at Settlements Associated with
Noncompliance
- Northwestern University (5M mischarging
Federal Grants, fraud, Time Effort issues) - Yale University - Tenured Professor forced out
for allegedly padding his business travel
expenses by approx. 150,000. He has made full
restitution and resigned. 1/21/05 article from
the Chronicle of Higher Education.
45A Look at Settlements Associated with
Noncompliance
- Florida International University - 11.5M for
improperly billing the U.S. Dept. of Energy for
scientists time, travel and administrative
expenses. Article taken from the Chronicle of
Higher Education, 2/15/05 - The Johns Hopkins University - 2.6M to settle
claim that scientists had overstated the amount
of time they were spending on projects financed
by the federal government. Article taken from
CHE, 3/1/04
46A Look at Settlements Associated with
Noncompliance
- University of Chicago (0.65M mischarging
Federal Grants) - University of Connecticut (1.3M training grant
issues) - Medical College of Georgia (10M theft of
research funds related to clinical trials- two
investigators with jail time) - University of Minnesota (32M program
income/clinical trial violations) - Stanford University (3.1M unallowable costs)
- From Gary Thompson Director of Grant
Compliance NIH through Ann Holmes from
University of Maryland
47Words to the Wise
- If you dont like being audited by an auditor,
you will really dislike being audited by an angry
auditor. NCURA
48Current Hot Buttons
- Final Reports
- Cost Transfers
- Cost Sharing
- Effort Reporting
- Departmental Administrative Costs
- Subrecipient Monitoring
- Program Income
49Additional Resources
- OMB Circulars
- http//www.whitehouse.gov/omb/circulars/a021/a21_2
004.html - http//www.whitehouse.gov/omb/circulars/a110/a110.
html - http//www.whitehouse.gov/omb/circulars/a133/a133.
html - Office of Sponsored Programs, located at 113
Bowne Hall - http//osp.syr.edu/
50OMB Circulars