What is the impact of this research on - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 39
About This Presentation
Title:

What is the impact of this research on

Description:

aimed to develop learners' ability to use language in real communication ... Weak and ... of sugar, flour, rice, powdered milk, coffee, tea. ( Each packet ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:49
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 40
Provided by: enlA
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: What is the impact of this research on


1
  • What is the impact of this research on
  • teaching methodology?

2
Communicative Language Teaching
  • aimed to develop learners ability to use
    language in real communication
  • Interactional function
  • Transactional function
  • It draws on
  • a functional model of language (Hallidays)
  • theory of communicative competence (Hymes)

3
Weak and strong version of CLT
  • Weak version based on a linguistic content
    (grammar or notions and function)
  • Teaching follows the methodological procedure
    PPP (Gower and Walters, 1983)
  • But this view of language learning was
    criticized (theoretically and practically)

4
Distinction between syllabus and methodology in
this version
  • Syllabus may be communicative (list of notions
    and functions)
  • Methodology is traditional and non-communicative
    PPP

5
Strong version of CLT TBL
  • Tasks provide the basis for an entire language
    curriculum
  • Task-based approach blurs the traditional
    distinction between syllabus and methodology

6
Is CLT the same as TBL?
  • CLT a broad, philosophical approach to the
    language curriculum that draws on theory and
    research in linguistics, anthropology, psychology
    and sociology
  • TBL a realization of this philosophy at the
    levels of syllabus design and methodology.
  • Other realizations of CLT content-based
    instruction, problem-based learning, etc.

7
Early 1980s switch to Task-based Instruction
  • Prabhu Bangalore Project in India (1979)
  • Most language learners taught by methods
    emphasizing mastery of grammar do not achieve a
    good level of competency
  • Language is a meaning system
  • Learners want to mean while trying to
    communicate, their language develops

8
Based on theory of learning
  • TBL is based on a theory of language learning
    rather than a theory of language structure
  • It proposes the use of tasks as a central
    component in the language classroom they provide
    better contexts for activating learner
    acquisition processes

9
Rationale for task-based teaching
  • The focus of instruction is on process rather
    than on product
  • Learners learn by interacting communicatively
    purposefully
  • Initially,focus is on fluency at the expense of
    accuracy (arguments against an explicit focus on
    grammar)
  • However, it was found that for achieving the
    level of accuracy some focus on grammar was
    needed (Nunan 1989)

10
Second Language Acquisition Research
  • Practice makes perfect does not always apply to
    learning grammar.
  • Students often fail to use it correctly when
    expressing themselves freely. This temporary
    mastery seems to happen when they are paying
    conscious attention to form, but not when they
    are trying to communicate and paying attention to
    meaning.

  • Jane Willis

11
  • Knowledge of grammatical rules was no guarantee
    of being able to use those rules for
    communication. Learners who were able to identify
    instances of rule violation, and who could even
    state the rule, frequently violated the rules
    when using language for communication.
  • David Nunan
    (1999)

12
Traditional versus Task-based course planning
  • Traditional Begin by breaking down the
    phonological, lexical and grammatical systems
    into their individual components, and teach these
    separately (synthetic approach).
  • Task-based Begin by listing the learning targets
    and objectives of learners. Present learners with
    holistic chunks of language in context and ask
    them to break them down into their parts
    (analytical approach).

13
What is a task?
  • Pedagogical task classroom work that involves
    learners in comprehending, manipulating,
    producing in the TL while their attention is on
    using their grammatical knowledge in order to
    express meaning.
  • Nunan, 2004

14
Tasks vs. exercises
  • Tasks are activities that call for primarily
    meaning-focused language use.
  • In contrast, exercises are activities that call
    for primarily form-focused language use.
  • However, we need to recognize that the overall
    purpose of tasks is the same as exercises
    learning a language the difference lying in the
    means by which this purpose is achieved (Ellis
    2003 3)

15
Tasks vs. grammar exercises
  • Tasks differ from grammatical exercises learners
    are free to use a range of language structures to
    achieve the task the forms are not specified in
    advance.
  • Willis and Willis, 2001

16
Characteristics of tasks
  • goal-directed activity
  • involves a primary focus on meaning
  • the participants choose the linguistic resources
    needed to complete the task.
  • has a clearly defined outcome
  • should have a non-linguistic outcome.
  • success in the task is evaluated in terms of
    achievement of an outcome, and tasks generally
    bear some resemblance to real-life language use.

17
Aim vs. outcome
  • Outcome refers to what learners arrive at when
    they have completed the task, e.g., a story, a
    list of differences, etc.
  • aim refers to the pedagogic purpose of the
    task to elicit meaning-focused language use.
  • It is possible to achieve a successful outcome
    without achieving the aim of a task.

18
Why Use Tasks?
  • Tasks
  • provide for natural learning in the language
    classroom.
  • are primarily focused on meaning, but can also
    be used to teach form.
  • are learner centered, call for a high degree of
    interaction, and are highly communicative.
  • can be used with more traditional approaches.

19
Tasks in the language classroom
  • A task is used primarily to build communicative
    competency and fluency skills.
  • A task can also enhance linguistic (grammar)
    skills, but this is not the main purpose of using
    a task.
  • Teaching approaches based on linguistic structure
    can use tasks to support structural teaching.

20
Parameters in Task Design
  • Open vs. Closed Tasks
  • Closed tasks have only one right answer or
    solution (eg. Spot the differences game)
  • Open tasks include experience-sharing tasks
  • SLA research favours closed tasks they generate
    more interaction and negotiation of meaning
    (Ellis, 2003)

21
One Way vs. Two-Way tasks
  • One way task Only one participant controls the
    flow of information (listening and arranging a
    sequence of pictures)
  • Two-way tasks interaction between two or more
    learners to achieve the task

22
Focused vs. Unfocused tasks
  • Unfocused task encourages the learner to use any
    language s/he wants
  • A focused task is a consciousness-raising
    activity and focuses on samples of language to
    explore particular features of it (classify the
    uses of a verb -ing forms that appear in a
    reading text)

23
Real-world target tasks vs. pedagogic tasks
  • Real-world tasks tasks that simulate situations
    that can take place in the real world (e.g.
    booking an airticket)
  • Pedagogic tasks a structured language learning
    task designed for classroom purposes

24
The theoretical principles underlying task-based
learning
  • The interaction-hypothesis perspective
  • The output hypothesis perspective
  • The cognitive perspective
  • The socio-cultural perspective

25
The Interaction hypothesis
  • Negotiation of meaning provides opportunities for
    (a) provision of comprehensible input and (b)
    production of modified input
  • Negotiation draws learner attention to linguistic
    form
  • This attention to lgc form necessary for L2
    learning as it creates a favourable context for
    negotiation of meaning (Ellis 2000)

26
The interaction hypothesis
  • Noticing is very important.
  • R. Schmidt what we learn has to be consciously
    noticed first.
  • no difference between acquisition and learning.
    (Schmidt vs. Krashen)

27
The output hypothesis
  • Learner output must be considered as a sign
  • of acquired knowledge (Krashen 1985)
  • of learning at work (Izumi, 2002, Swain, 1998,
    2000).
  • Output forces learners to move from a semantic
    analysis of the TL to a more syntactic analysis
  • Learners notice a gap and stretch their
    interlanguage capacity in order to fill it
    pushed output

28
The cognitive perspective
  • Skehan (1998) distinguishes between three aspects
    of learner performance
  • fluency
  • accuracy
  • complexity
  • These can be influenced by involving learners in
    different types of production and comprehension
  • fluency engagement in meaning-oriented tasks
  • accuracy or complexity involvement in more
    form-focused tasks

29
The socio-cultural perspective
  • Learners collaborative construction of knowledge
    engages them in cognitive processes and L2
    learning (Lantolf, 1996)
  • Dialogic interaction is necessary for language
    learning (Vygotsky, 1987)
  • In collaborative dialogues learners are able to
    achieve what none of them was able to do
    individually (Swain 1997) scaffolding

30
Tasks in Communicative Approach Language Teaching
  • From an interactionist perspective, a task is a
    work plan that provides the opportunity for
    students to negotiate meaning (Long 1989)
  • From a sociocultural perspective, a task is a
    framework for learning by problem solving in a
    social event (the Vygotskian model).
  • From both perspectives, a task is the main
    framework for cooperative and collaborative
    learning.

31
Seven types of task
  • Listing
  • Ordering Sorting (sequencing, ranking,
    classifying)
  • Matching
  • Comparing
  • Problem-solving
  • Sharing personal experiences
  • Projects and creative tasks.

32
A Framework for TBLT
  • Real-world / target tasks
  • Pedagogical tasks

Enabling skills
Rehearsal tasks
Activation tasks
Language exercises
Communicative activities
Nunan, D. 1999. Second Language Teaching and
Learning. Boston Heinle / Thomson Learning
33
Examples
  • Real world task
  • Call the airline and reconfirm a reservation you
    have. Check other details, such as time of
    departure, and time you have to be at the
    airport.

34
Examples
  • Rehearsal task
  • Write your resume and exchange it with another
    student. Study the positions available in
    advertisements in the newspaper and find a job
    that would be suitable for your partner.

35
Examples
  • Activation task
  • Work with three other students. You are on a ship
    that is sinking. You have to swim to a nearby
    island. You have a waterproof container, but can
    only carry 20 kilos of items in it. Decide which
    of the following items you will take. (Remember,
    you cant take more than 20 kilos with you.)
  • (cont)

36
Examples
  • Activation task (cont)

37
Examples
  • Enabling skills
  • Teach vocabulary
  • Comedies, horror films, action movies, romances,
    thrillers, dramas
  • Teach structures
  • What kind of movies do you like?
  • I like_____________.
  • Do you like__________?
  • Yes, I do.
  • No, I dont.

38
Examples
  • Language exercise
  • Fill in the blanks with these words
  • boring, romance, Annie McDowell, Chocolate and
    Roses
  • _______ is a terrible actress. Her new movie
    is _______. Its a ______, but its also
    extremely ________.

39
Examples
  • Communicative activity
  • Find someone who .
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com