Theories of Mass Communication - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 13
About This Presentation
Title:

Theories of Mass Communication

Description:

Top movie directors used to motivate troops. Idea was to harness powerful mass media ... A time lag from headlines to poll results. Later, some critiques ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:1979
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 14
Provided by: isu62
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Theories of Mass Communication


1
Theories of Mass Communication
2
From Powerful to Minimal Effects
  • Mass media A powerful persuasion tool
  • Powerful effects model of mass media
  • Hypodermic model injecting ideas/opinions
  • War of the Worlds broadcast
  • Hitlers use of media for persuasion
  • Later replaced by minimal effects model
  • Why we Fight series of movies
  • Top movie directors used to motivate troops
  • Idea was to harness powerful mass media
  • Tested on troops, but found little attitude
    change
  • New view media have little effect on views
    opinions

3
From Minimal to Conditional Model
  • But was evidence that media did matter!
  • A more nuanced proposal emerged
  • Avoided extremes of earlier models
  • Keys to new perspective
  • Mass media not all powerful
  • Audience not passive waiting to be manipulated
  • Mass media can have an effect on people/society
  • Basic questions
  • Who did it effect?
  • When did it affect them?
  • How did it affected them?

4
Agenda Setting Theory
  • A reaction to Minimal Effects model
  • Explained why minimal effects found
  • Peoples opinions dont change
  • Issue salience/relevance does change
  • Mass media shape issue salience!
  • Revived mass comm effects research
  • Key Medias agenda ? publics agenda
  • Media not good at telling us what to think media
    are good at telling us what to think about
  • We judge important issues the media says is
    important
  • We judge unimportant issues media ignores or
    downplays

5
Research Results Mixed
  • Early studies
  • Issues prominent in media predict publics issues
  • A time lag from headlines to poll results
  • Later, some critiques
  • Correlations Directionality, third variable
  • Alt 1 public concern ? news
  • Alt 2 reality ? news AND public concern

6
Refining Agenda Setting
  • Other factors shaping process?
  • Need for Orientation Low knowledge/education/sa
    lience ? high reliance on media?
  • Who Sets Gatekeepers Agenda?
  • elite media?
  • politicians?
  • interest aggregations?
  • definition of news?
  • Media profit-making pressures?

7
Uses and Gratifications
  • Changes the basic question about medias role
  • Used to be What do media do to us?
  • Now was What do we do with the media?
  • Assumes an active audience
  • We choose whether or not to use and what we use
  • We choose what content to view/hear/read
  • We decide how to interpret
  • We decide how to respond

8
Uses and Grats
  • Desire for gratifications guides medium use
  • What grats do we seek from media?
  • Diversion stress relief, avoidance
  • Social/parasocial relationships
  • Identity needs Who we are/values clarification
  • Surveillance Keep up with events

9
Updated version Uses and effects
  • Are media or audience most powerful?
  • Media content an important social force
  • We decide what, when, how to engage content
  • Maybe media and audience affect each other
  • Might media use shape gratifications sought
  • Maybe seeking gratifications leads to effects
  • Reconciles two perspectives
  • Role of audience
  • Role of media content

10
Cultivation Theory
  • Long-term debate about media effects
  • Concerns that TV contributes to social problems
  • Similar concerns about books, movies, comics
  • If can prove link, may lead to solutions
  • Focus Long-term effects of violent programs
  • Exposure cultivates attitudes
  • Attitudes reflect programmings distortions

11
Television Distorts Reality
  • Violence Index violence on TV steady, high
  • 2/3rds of all programs contain violence
  • Adult dramas 5 violent acts/hour
  • Kids shows 20 violent acts/hour
  • Kids see 13,000 violent deaths by 18
  • Violence by villains and heroes
  • Other distortions found in studies
  • Victims often female, minority, poorer
  • Fewer kids, women, minorities, elderly appear

12
Effects of Exposure
  • Cultivation Theory Hypotheses
  • Heavy viewers ? television answer
  • Light viewers ? more realistic answers
  • Heavy viewing ? Mean World Syndrome
  • Believe more likely to be victim, more fearful
  • Believe police pervasive, aggressive
  • More suspicious of others generally

13
Explanations for Effects
  • Homogenization
  • TV blurs, blends, bends views
  • TV promotes TV mainstream view of world
  • Some evidence in support
  • Groups w/different views among light viewers do
    not differ among heavy viewers
  • Attitudes to emerge from mean world
    perceptions generally more conservative
  • Resonance TV reinforces real-world experiences
    with violence -- doubly powerful
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com