Attitude - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 16
About This Presentation
Title:

Attitude

Description:

You have 20 points in total to distribute among the cars: VW: 14; Volvo: 4; LADA: 2 ... do you prefer VW to Volvo: yes - no, do you prefer Volvo to Lada: yes - no. Do ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:47
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 17
Provided by: hem3
Category:
Tags: attitude | volvo

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Attitude


1
Attitude
A continuos state of mind which makes the
respondent answer consistently and in a certain
way, when asked about various aspects - either
concerning himself or his surroundings. 3
dimensions Affection general feeling towards
the subject in question Cognition general
knowledge or perception of a subject Behaviour i
ntention and attitude expectations in relation to
a subject Problem not directly
observable
2
Measuring Attitudes
  • Indirect measuring by using qualitative
    techniques
  • Ranking
  • ranks a limited number of variables on the basis
    of qualities or stimulation
  • Rating
  • expresses the strength in his opinion about the
    qualities of the object
  • Sorting
  • cards for each of the products are arranged in
    order
  • Choice
  • a choice is made between 2 alternatives, and the
    alternative which is most frequently chosen
    first, is said to be the preferred choice
  • Physiological measures
  • skin response, blood pressure, pupil dilation

3
Simple rating scale
How do you evaluate the following characteristics
of the new drinking yogurt? positive negative
no opinion taste 1 2 3 color
1 2 3 consistency 1 2 3
4
Category scale
How often do you go to the Cinema? _
Never _ Rarely _ Sometimes _
Often _ Very often Allow respondent to
indicate the intensity in their attitude
5
Likert scale
1. Exercise is an essential component of a
healthy life-style strongly moderately mildly m
ildly moderately strongly disagree disagree disag
ree agree agree agree 1 2
3 4 5 6 2. Combating drug abuse
should be a top national priority completely mos
tly equally mostly completely true true
true and untrue untrue untrue 1
2 3 4 5 Respondent indicate
agreement or disagreement - weights are assigned
and summed for data analysis
6
Semantic differential Numerical scale
  • Semantic differential
  • Target stimulus (provocation)
  • Adjective pairs representing opposite end of a
    continuum
  • bipolar friendly-hostile, unipolar friendly-not
    friendly
  • Numerical scale
  • Similar to semantic differential scales but
  • uses numbers as representatives of options
    instead of lines

7
Semantic differential Numerical scale
  • Semantic differential
  • How do you see automobile salesmen?
  • Honest - Dishonest
  • Quiet - Noisy
  • Numerical scale
  • How do you see automobile salesmen?
  • Honest 1 2 3 4 5 Dishonest
  • Quiet -2-1 0 1 2 Noisy

8
Constant-sum scale
Distribution of a constant sum (typically 100 or
a sum of money) among a number of
specified options (characteristics
etc.) increasing complexity with increasing
number of options requires experienced
(educated) respondents
9
Constant-sum scale
What do you emphasise when planning your business
flight (divide 100 points among the following
components)? departure and arrival on time
_________ frequent connections _________ service
on board _________ check-in time less than 10
minutes _________
10
Other scales
  • stapel scale (direction and intensity - one
    keyword)
  • graphic rating scale (e.g. ladder scale or happy
    faces)
  • ranking (paired or multiple comparisons)
  • sorting (association)

11
Ranking
Resp. Brand name no. Yog Yogger Yogo Yoker Whr
oom New Yog 1 5 4 3 2 6 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 2 3 4 1 2 3
6 5 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39
3 1 5 4 6 2 40 5 3 6 1 4 2
evaluation of brand name for new drinking yogurt
(ranking)
12
Choice
Resp. Brand name no. Yog Yogger Yogo Yoker Whr
oom New Yog 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 0 1 1 0
0 0 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39
1 1 1 1 1 1 40 0 0 0 0 0 0
evaluation of applicability of brand name for new
drinking yogurt (choice)
13
Thurstone scale
agree disagree 1. Achievin
g success is the only way for my child to repay
my efforts as a parent 1 2 2. Going to a
good college and getting a good job are
important but not essential to my childs
happiness 1 2 3. Happiness has nothing to
do with achieving educational or material
goals 1 2 4. The customarily valued
trappings of success are a hindrance to true
happiness 1 2 Requires comprehensive
(subjective) evaluation of the questions and the
results
14
Attitude Scales - see also p. 300
  • RATING
  • Simple attitude scaling. Ex for, against, dont
    know
  • Category scales. Ex never, seldom,some times,
    often, always
  • Likert scales ranging from very positive to very
    negative - see.p. 292
  • Semantic differential, Ex Modern __ __ __
    __ __ __ __ Old fashioned
  • Numerical scales Ex Modern 1 2
    3 4 5 6 7 Old fashioned
  • Stapel scales Ex how good is Nyrup? -2 -1 0
    1 2 (one keyword)
  • Constant-sum scales, Ex What is your attitude
    towards the following 3 car models. You have 20
    points in total to distribute among the cars VW
    14 Volvo 4 LADA 2
  • Graphic rating scale. Ex how good is Nyrup
    -2______2 (or children's happy faces)
  • RANKING
  • Paired comparison, Ex do you prefer VW to Volvo
    yes - no, do you prefer Volvo to Lada yes - no.
    Do you prefer VW to Lada yes - no

15
Balance
  • Odd or even numbers of options
  • depending on purpose and type of question
  • odd allows a neutral appraisal (indifferent)
  • even forces respondent to make a commitment

16
Considerations for choice of Scales
  • Is rating, ranking, choice or sorting preferable
    for this situation ?
  • Should Monadic (simple) or Comparative (complex)
    rating scales be used ? P. 303
  • Should a Category label be used, and which ?
    (numbers or text?)
  • How many response positions? Even or uneven
    number?
  • Should the scales be balanced ? (ex 4-options
    with 2 positive and 2 negative options) or
    un-balanced (ex 5 options with 3 positive and 2
    negative options) - balance versus bias
  • Forced choice in the scales? - more no-answer
    responds
  • Single measurement or Index measure ?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com