Efficient Diversification - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 37
About This Presentation
Title:

Efficient Diversification

Description:

F. P. P&F. A&F. M. A. G. P. M. s. ALTERNATIVE CALS. Dominant CAL with a Risk-Free Investment (F) ... the stock's expected return if the. market's excess return is zero ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:100
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 38
Provided by: McGrawHill7
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Efficient Diversification


1
Chapter 6
  • Efficient Diversification

2
Sources of Uncertainty
  • General Economic Conditions Business cycle,
    inflation, interest rates are macro-economic
    conditions that are unknown.
  • Firm Specific Conditions RD success,
    Management, sector, etc.

3
Benefits of Diversification
  • Investing in several stocks reduces portfolio
    risk by reducing exposure to firm specific risks.
    Ex. Invest in Enron and IBM. Management
    decisions independent of each other.
  • Example Invest in Crystal Farms and Hershey.

4
Diversification
5
Diversification cont.
  • Expected return from investing in Crystal Farm
    .5(15) .5(-5) 5
  • Expected return from investing in Hershey
    .5(-5) .5(15) 5
  • VAR of Crystal Farms returns 100
  • VAR of Hersheys returns 100
  • Why invest in both companies?

6
Two-Security Portfolio Return
rp W1r1 W2r2 W1 Proportion of funds in
Security 1 W2 Proportion of funds in Security
2 r1 Expected return on Security 1 r2
Expected return on Security 2
7
Two-Security Portfolio Risk
sp2 w12s12 w22s22 2W1W2 Cov(r1r2)
8
Combined Portfolio
  • Invest ½ our money in Crystal and ½ in Hersheys
  • Expected Return of combined portfolio ERcomb
    .5 ERc .5 ERH 5

9
Covariance?
  • The covariance is a measure of the linear
    association between two variables.
  • A positive covariance indicates a positive
    relation
  • A negative covariance indicates a negative
    relation

10
Covariance Calculation
  • VAR(Rcomb) .52 (100) .52100
    2.5.5(-100) 0
  • ERcomb 5
  • VARRcomb 0
  • By diversifying we were able to earn the same
    expected return and reduce risk to zero.

11
Correlation Coefficient
  • Allows us to interpret the strength of a linear
    relationship between two variables.
  • Related to the covariance
  • Ranges between -1 and 1

12
Covariance
Cov(r1r2) r1,2s1s2
r1,2 Correlation coefficient of
returns
s1 Standard deviation of returns for
Security 1 s2 Standard deviation of
returns for Security 2
13
Example
  • Rho Cov(Rc, Rh)/(std(Rc) std(Rh))
  • Rho -100/(10)(10) -1
  • Returns on crystal farm and hersheys are
    perfectly negatively correlated, which allows us
    to reduce the firm specific risk to zero.
  • 20 stocks equals a diversified portfolio.

14
Risk-Return Trade-Off with Two-Security Portfolio
E(rp) W1r1 W2r2
sp2 w12s12 w22s22 2W1W2 Cov(r1r2)
sp w12s12 w22s22 2W1W2 Cov(r1r2)1/2
15
Portfolio Risk/Return Two Securities Correlation
Effects
  • Relationship depends on correlation coefficient
  • -1.0 lt r lt 1.0
  • The smaller the correlation, the greater the risk
    reduction potential
  • If r 1.0, no risk reduction is possible

16
Investment Opportunity Set
  • Combinations of risk/return offered by different
    portfolios.
  • Excel file ch6.2.xls displays this set for 2
    risky assets.
  • Mean-Variance Criterion Portfolio A dominates
    portfolio B if E(rA)gtE(rB) and sA lt sB

17
Minimum Variance Combination
1
s 2
- Cov(r1r2)
2

W1
s 2
s 2
- 2Cov(r1r2)

2
1
(1 - W1)
W2
18
TWO-SECURITY PORTFOLIOS WITH DIFFERENT
CORRELATIONS
r 0
19
Minimum Variance Combination r .2
(.2)2 - (.2)(.15)(.2)

W1
(.15)2 (.2)2 - 2(.2)(.15)(.2)
W1
.6733
W2
(1 - .6733) .3267
20
Minimum Variance Return and Risk with r .2
rp .6733(.10) .3267(.14) .1131
s
(.6733)2(.15)2 (.3267)2(.2)2
p
1/2
2(.6733)(.3267)(.2)(.15)(.2)
1/2
.0171
.1308
s
p
21
Minimum Variance Combination r -.3
(.2)2 - (.2)(.15)(.2)

W1
(.15)2 (.2)2 - 2(.2)(.15)(-.3)
W1
.6087
W2
(1 - .6087) .3913
22
Minimum Variance Return and Risk with r -.3
rp .6087(.10) .3913(.14) .1157
s
(.6087)2(.15)2 (.3913)2(.2)2
p
1/2
2(.6087)(.3913)(.2)(.15)(-.3)
1/2
.0102
.1009
s
p
23
Extending to Include Riskless Asset
  • The optimal combination becomes linear
  • A single combination of risky and riskless assets
    will dominate

24
ALTERNATIVE CALS
CAL (P)
CAL (A)
E(r)
M
M
P
P
CAL (Global minimum variance)
A
A
G
F
s
P
PF
AF
M
25
Dominant CAL with a Risk-Free Investment (F)
  • CAL(P) dominates other lines -- it has the best
    risk/return or the largest slope
  • Slope (E(R) - Rf) / s
  • E(RP) - Rf) / s P gt E(RA) - Rf) / sA
  • All investors will select the same risky
    portfolio because it offers the highest return
    per unit of risk.

26
Investment Decision
  • Return/Risk using optimal CAL
  • If we want to earn 12 returns then we must
    invest 1.9 in the optimal portfolio and -.9 in
    T-Bills
  • Std. Deviation 34.14

27
Efficient Diversification
  • Determine the most efficient investment
    opportunity set from the risky assets considered.
  • Find the optimal portfolio of risky assets by
    finding the portfolio with the steepest CAL.
  • Find the right mix of Rf and risky portfolio
    based on risk preferences of investor.

28
Extending Concepts to All Securities
  • The optimal combinations result in lowest level
    of risk for a given return
  • The optimal trade-off is described as the
    efficient frontier
  • These portfolios are dominant
  • Calculated in Ch6.4.xls

29
The minimum-variance frontier of risky assets
E(r)
Efficient frontier
Individual assets
Global minimum variance portfolio
Minimum variance frontier
St. Dev.
30
Single Factor Model
  • Ri E(Ri) ßiM e
  • Ri ri - rf
  • ßi sensitivity of a securities particular
    return to factor/macro events.
  • M some macro factor in this case M is
    unanticipated movement M is expected to be zero.

31
Single Index Model
(
)
(
)
b
a
e
r
r
r
r

-


-
f
m
f
i
i
i
i
Risk Prem
Market Risk Prem
or Index Risk Prem
a
the stocks expected return if the markets
excess return is zero
i
(rm - rf) 0
ßi(rm - rf) the component of return due to
movements in the market index
ei firm specific component, not due to market
movements
32
Estimating the Index Model
Excess Returns (i)
.
.
.
.
.
.
Security Characteristic Line
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Excess returns on market index
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Ri a i ßiRm ei
33
Regression Analysis
  • Intercept Expected excess return.
  • Beta Measures the responsiveness of security
    excess returns to market factors. Risk measure
  • Beta gt 1 has above average risk aggressive
    investment.

34
Measuring Components of Risk
  • si2 bi2 sm2 s2(ei)
  • where
  • si2 total variance
  • bi2 sm2 systematic variance
  • s2(ei) unsystematic variance

35
Components of Risk
  • Market or systematic risk risk related to the
    macro economic factor or market index
  • Unsystematic or firm specific risk risk not
    related to the macro factor or market index
  • Total risk Systematic Unsystematic

36
Examining Percentage of Variance
  • Total Risk Systematic Risk Unsystematic Risk
  • Systematic Risk/Total Risk r2
  • ßi2 s m2 / s2 r2
  • bi2 sm2 / bi2 sm2 s2(ei) r2

37
Advantages of the Single Index Model
  • Reduces the number of inputs for diversification
  • Easier for security analysts to specialize
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com