Mergers and Acquisitions - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 11
About This Presentation
Title:

Mergers and Acquisitions

Description:

Motive for mergers (??? ??) NPV of mergers (??? NPV) Cash offer vs. ... Leveraged buy out (LBO): Going private transaction (i.e. ... Leveraged Buyouts ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:170
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 12
Provided by: homeE
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Mergers and Acquisitions


1
Mergers and Acquisitions
Chapter 30
2
Mergers and Acquisitions
  • Terminology (??)
  • Motive for mergers (??? ??)
  • NPV of mergers (??? NPV)
  • Cash offer vs. stock offer (?? vs. ????)
  • Defensive Tactics (?? ??)
  • Performance (??)

3
Terminology
  • A merger refers to the absorption of one firm by
    another. The acquiring firms (bidders) retains
    its name and its identity.
  • A consolidation is the same as a merger except
    that an entirely new firm is created.
  • Tender offer is a public offer to buy shares of a
    target firm. It is made by one firm directly to
    the shareholders of another firm.
  • Leveraged buy out (LBO) Going private
    transaction (i.e., make a public company private)
    financed with large amounts of debt.
  • Golden Parachutes Compensation to the target
    firm's managers for a loss of jobs following a
    change of control. (?????)
  • Poison Pill A right to buy shares in the merged
    firm at a bargain price. The right is granted to
    the target firm's shareholders, contingent on
    another firm acquiring control. (????)

4
Synergy from an acquisition
  • Definition The difference between the value of
    the combined firm and the sum of the values of
    the firms as separate entities
  • Synergy VAB (VA VB)
  • VAB (VA VB) Synergy

5
Sources of Synergy from Acquisitions
  • Revenue enhancement possibly from an improvement
    of marketing, strategic benefits, and the
    increase of market power.
  • Cost reduction (????)
  • Economies of scale Reduction of the average cost
    by increasing the size.
  • Economies of vertical integration Make
    coordination of closely related operating
    activities easier (e.g., Airlines companies
    purchase hotels and car-rental companies)
  • Complementary resources make better use of
    existing resources.
  • Elimination of inefficient management (market for
    corporate control)
  • Tax gains (????)
  • The use of tax losses from net operating losses
  • The use of unused debt capacity
  • Lower the cost of capital The cost of issuing
    securities are subject to economies of scale.

6
Other Theories of Mergers
  • Free Cash Flow Hypothesis (?? ????)
  • Some observers consider mergers as a
    symptom of agency problems rather than as a
    solution. Managers are motivated to increase the
    size of their firm.
  • Signaling (????)
  • When a firm receives a tender offer, this
    conveys information to the market that a bidder
    sees value in the firm greater than its market
    price. The target shares are undervalued and the
    offer prompts the market to revalue shares.
  • Winners curse and Hubris (??? ??)
  • When there are many bidders or competitors
    for an object of highly uncertain value, a wide
    range of bids is likely to result. The highest
    bidder will typically pay in excess of the
    expected value. The winning bidder is cursed in
    the sense that its bid exceeds the value. The
    higher valuation of the bidders resulted from
    hubris. Roll (1986) hypothesized that managers
    committed errors of over-optimism in evaluating
    merger opportunities due to hubris.

7
NPV of a Merger
  • Definition
  • NPV of a merger to acquirer Synergy
    Premium
  • Total value of the firm after a merger between A
    and B. Synergy VAB (VA VB) Premium
    Payment VB

A
B
Synergy
8
Defensive Tactics
  • Repurchase or Standstill Agreement
  • Repurchase the stocks from the bidder at premium
    (Greenmail)
  • Standstill agreement the bidding firm agrees to
    limit its holdings of another firm.
  • Exclusionary Self Tenders
  • Tender offer at premium excluding some targeted
    shareholders (dilute the value of non-tendering
    shares)
  • Going Private and Leveraged Buyouts (LBO)
  • Going Private the publicly owned stock in a firm
    is purchased by a private group. As a
    consequence, the company is not public company
    anymore.
  • LBO Going private transaction financed with
    large amounts of debt.

9
Defensive Tactics Anti-takeover amendments
  • Super-majority amendments require shareholder
    approval by at least two-thirds vote and
    sometimes as much as 90 of the voting power for
    all transactions involving change of control.
  • Fair-price amendments A fair price is paid for
    all purchased shares. The fair price if commonly
    defined as the highest price paid by the bidder
    during a specified period. It defends against
    two-tier tender offers.
  • Staggered boards Staggered, or classified,
    boards of directors delay effective transfer of
    control in a takeover. For example, a nine-member
    board might be divided into three classes, with
    only three members standing for election to a
    three-year term each year. Thus, a new majority
    shareholder would have to wait at least two
    annual meetings to gain control of the board of
    directors.

10
Some Evidence on Merger
  • Jensen and Ruback (1983 JFE) The market for
    corporate control the arena where in which
    different management teams compete for the rights
    to manage corporate resources.
  • Evidence
  • The shareholders of target companies in
    successful takeovers achieve large positive
    abnormal returns (20 - 30)
  • The shareholders of bidding firms experience
    small or zero abnormal returns (0 - 4)
  • The shareholders of both target and bidding firms
    of unsuccessful takeovers experience small
    negative abnormal returns.
  • Combined values of firms increase by an average
    of 8.4, or even larger recently.
  • Actions that prevent firms from being taken over,
    hurt shareholders.
  • Actions that make is less likely that management
    opposes a takeover, do not hurt shareholders.

11
Cash vs. Stock Acquisition
  • Loughran and Vijh (1997 JF)
  • Companies that made cash acquisitions did better
    than benchmark firms after acquisition
  • Companies that made stock acquisition did
    considerably worse than a benchmark.
  • Cumulative Access Returns (From Table VII)
  • AD (announcement date, ???), ED (effective date,
    ???)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com