Getting to Know You - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 28
About This Presentation
Title:

Getting to Know You

Description:

Broken down into many Directorates Infrastructure, Research, Engineering, Quality etc. ... a faster cleaner engagement; zero contractual wrangling post contract ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:61
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 29
Provided by: bobwarddon
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Getting to Know You


1
Getting to Know You
  • Donna Williams Open Text Principal Business
    Consultant
  • Bob Ward AWE Plc, Senior Project Manager -
    Corporate Data Systems
  • Monday 26th April 2004

2
AWE Plc
  • AWE is a GOCO Government-owned/Contractor-operat
    ed arrangement
  • Managing companies are
  • Lockheed Martin
  • BNFL
  • Serco
  • Broken down into many Directorates
    Infrastructure, Research, Engineering, Quality
    etc.
  • www.awe.co.uk

3
Scope of talk
  • The Need for AWE to have a EDRMS
  • Current product is EDMS98 from Documentum
  • The selection Process
  • The Project Engagement Experience
  • The next stages and future vision
  • Lessons Learnt

4
The need for AWE
  • Main Drivers - External
  • Regulatory confidence
  • Customer Engineering
  • FOI
  • Main Drivers Internal
  • Efficiency gains
  • Effectiveness -gt Processes -gt Workflow
  • Manage Legacy Potential hardcopy records
  • Risk Management
  • Single Repository
  • Configuration going forward
  • Single cross company system

5
Current System
  • Current EDMS98
  • is out of support
  • Does not meet the future business needs of
  • Engineering
  • the rest of site
  • Upgrade or New Install
  • Even if we stay with Documentum and Upgrade via
    4i to 5i, it will be treated as a new install on
    new hardware

6
The Selection Process
  • The mechanics
  • AWE company wide requirements capture
  • Visited about eight companies to get a look and
    feel - from the exciting to the put you to sleep
  • Created short list of 4 Documentum, Filenet,
    Hummingbird, Open Text,
  • Created detailed Requirements spec

7
The Selection Process
  • Sent out ITT
  • Replies assessed
  • Company wide show and tell from three selected
  • A mathematical and statistical method of
    Evaluation and Selection was applied
  • Why not go with the maths.
  • Only a fraction of the picture
  • We required a relationship that could work with
    AWE
  • We have our own idiosyncrasies

8
Normally
Training Deployment to 400
Phase 1
Phase 2
Kick Off Meeting
Phase 3
Scope Creep
More Time
More Money

Quality
Time
Cost
9
I have a cunning plan
10
I have a cunning plan
  • Lets forget the software folks - they both do
    what they say on the box
  • Its now down to the way of engaging
  • Setting the boundaries really tightly for Phase 1
    (Constraining the Ferrari to a Mondeo)
  • Outlining the scope for following phases, Mondeo
    to Mercedes to Ferrari
  • We wanted a proposal based upon the defined
    boundary - without costs - Consultancy or Software

11
Concerns lie with business styles, relationship
and long-term commitment
  • Kick-off objective prior to contract placement
  • Better understanding of AWE requirements for all
    parties AWE and supplier
  • Understand and reduce risk to the project
  • Develop selection discriminators
  • proposed plans
  • relationship
  • system lifetime cost
  • Understand and develop a method and style of
    engagement

12
What we did
Phase 1
Kick Off Meeting
13
What we did
Phase 1
Kick Off Meeting
14
What we did
Phase 1
Kick Off Meeting
Fixed Scope
Fixed Time
Firm Budget
Quality
Time
Cost
15
Applied to both Suppliers
  • Open Text - willing to engage with an open mind
    and effort
  • Documentum - very very hard to get them to engage
    - they had a process and seemed not to be able to
    flex from it.

16
What did it entail
  • Effort on both parties
  • Trust by both parties
  • AWE - the board would sign up to what was worked
    out
  • Open Text - Willing to work together and
    potentially come 2nd
  • 5 shared sessions - 2 Workshops and then..

17
From Open Text
  • Not just Pre-Sales Team
  • Commitment to the Partnership
  • Global Services,
  • Technical Architects,
  • Project Manager
  • Business Consultants
  • A proposal without any cost - Days yes, Modules
    yes, Money no.
  • Buy into the what was actually needed to deliver
    the agreed scope - then cost it

18
Output - From Open Text
  • A Mini BASS (Business Assessment Scoping Study) -
    More closely understanding key requirements and a
    confidence that scope had a firm boundary
  • Expectations
  • Eyes Wide open, Constraints within the AWE
    Environment

19
Output - For AWE
  • Confidence in Open Text
  • Relationship - we now know each other
  • Partnership - we both wanted it to work
  • Openness - not worried about telling it as it was
  • Trust - watching out for each other
  • A costed proposal with story board the activities
    with clear descriptions
  • A detailed activity plan
  • An indication of phase and indicative life time
    cost

20
The negotiation
  • The understanding of what AWE wanted, OT could
    deliver, guide - on price - accepted as fact
  • On software and maintenance and modules
  • And if it goes a bit wrong - agreement on both
    sides to do what was required to put it right

21
The Project Engagement Experience
  • AWEs Viewpoint
  • Open Text Viewpoint

22
AWE View
  • It does exactly what it says on the box
  • To time
  • To Cost
  • Zero Creep
  • We own the training material
  • We understand the design
  • We can see the potential

23
Open Text View
  • Strong Project Management on both sides
  • Communication
  • Control of scope
  • Capture futures wish list!
  • Commitment
  • Supporting Deployment
  • Need to equip people to deliver quality

24
Summary of engagement so far
  • Very clear project definition project phases,
    resulting in time boxing, no specification creep,
    clarity on both sides prior to engagement a
    faster cleaner engagement zero contractual
    wrangling post contract

25
Did we hit the spot?
  • Main Drivers - External
  • Regulatory confidence
  • Customer Engineering
  • FOI
  • Main Drivers Internal
  • Efficiency gains
  • Effectiveness -gt Processes -gt Workflow
  • Manage Legacy Potential hardcopy records
  • Risk Management
  • Single Repository
  • Configuration going forward
  • Single cross company system

26
Lessons Learnt
  • The Cunning Plan approach worked
  • The end users designed the system
  • Recognition at all levels of the commitment and
    support
  • Flushed out deficiencies in our own IT
    environment

27
The next stages and future vision
  • This is now being defined in partnership
  • Exploit more of the base functionality
  • Integrate with AWEs strategy - only do what is
    needed based upon a business need
  • Add in drawing module and scope

28
We are still getting to know you (each other)
  • Questions
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com