Title:
1Étude De Faisabilité Pour L'étude Longitudinale
Canadienne Sur Le Vieillissement (ELCV)
Exploration Des Attitudes Sur L Incapacité
Mentale Et Participation À Long Terme
-----------------------------------
- Feasibility Study for the Canadian Longitudinal
Study on Aging (CLSA)Â Â -
- Exploring Attitudes about Mental Incapacity and
Long Term Participation - Dr. Linda Furlini
- Â
2OUTLINE
- Overview of the CLSA
- Introduction to Feasibility Study
- Emerging questions
- Background
- Main Objectives
- Proposed Methodology
- Anticipated Results
3Overview of the CLSA
- Examine aging as a dynamic process
- Successful aging
-
- Broad , multidisciplinary long term
observational - study
- Study involves no experimentation
- Variety of data collection methods
- Information collected on the changing
biological, medical, psychological, social,
and economic aspects of
older Canadians.
4Overview of the CLSA
- REQUIRES THE LONG TERM PARTICIPATION OF
PARTICIPANTS - 50,000 Canadian women and men aged 40 to 84
living in the community - followed for a period of at least 20 years
- not cognitively impaired at baseline
- Repeated assessments
- Every 3 years, until age 80
- Yearly thereafter
- Linkage to databases
5Overview of the CLSA
- 50,000 individuals will be interviewed with
questionnaires administered over the phone or in
person - Subgroup of 30,000 individuals selected to
undergo in-depth assessment over the course of
the study - Remaining 20,000 participating primarily through
telephone interviews
6Data Collection Sites
- NFLD
- Nova Scotia
- Québec
- Ontario
- Manitoba
- Alberta
- BC
- St. Johns
- Halifax
- Sherbrooke Montréal
- Ottawa Ham/GTA
- Winnipeg
- Calgary
- Vancouver Victoria
7Introduction
- CLSA researchers will face particular
challenges - Participants must provide ongoing informed
consent for a period of not less than twenty
years. - Emerging questions
- Relevant and important to most long-term
observational studies involving older adults
8Emerging questions
- If mental incapacity develops
- Can researchers use data for purposes that were
unforeseen at the time participants provided
Informed Consent (IC)? - Can researchers continue to collect data from
mentally incapacitated participants? - Will they be permitted to continue using data
that have already been collected?
9Objective
- THE MAIN OBJECTIVE OF THIS FEASIBLITY STUDY IS
TO DETERMINE HOW POTENTIAL CLSA PARTICIPANTS
PERCEIVE ONGOING INFORMED CONSENT IF MENTAL
INCAPACITY DEVELOPS
10Background
- Mental Capacity to provide Informed Consent
- Aging significantly increases likelihood of
suffering from diseases that affect mental
capacity to provide informed consent,
particularly dementia - Current incidence considerably underestimated
(Canadian Study on Health and Aging Working
Group, 2000) - Prevalence will be magnified by aging baby
boomers - Older persons may be affected by a variety of
other conditions and diseases, such as mental
illness - Some conditions may be transient, such as
recovering from a stroke -
11Risks of Participation
- Participants will receive little or no personal
benefit - A tendency to focus on risks in studies, such as
the CLSA, where participants receive little or no
personal benefit - Potential risk Threat to personal privacy
- (Data collection, data linkage, data storage,
future uses of DNA samples) - Researchers face unique challenges in monitoring
potential risks and conveying such information to
participants
12Risks of Participation
- Future advances in research may introduce risks
that are unforeseeable at the inception of a
study - Unforeseeable risks take on greater importance
when participants become mentally incapacitated - Unable to contribute to decisions about personal
privacy that may have far-reaching effects - An appreciation of public attitudes about the
risks of participation in LOR is needed
13Substitute Decision-Making
- Substitute Decision-Makers (proxies who will
answer for the participant in the event of mental
incapacity) - Legislation varies from province to province
- In Québec, substitute decision-makers are
required for experimental research and their
legal status remains ambiguous for research
involving minimal risk - Current laws do not specifically address LOR
involving minimal risk - Little is known about the willingness of
participants to appoint SDMs or what their
appointment may entail.
14Substitute Decision-Making
- Usually family caregivers
- Possess health data that would be inaccessible
were they not involved - May contribute to the reliability of participant
information - Facilitates patient tracing
- Involving Substitute decision-makers reduces
attrition
15Substitute Decision-Making
- Researchers must be attuned to their specific
needs and how to meet them - Attrition is reduced when caregiver-centered
approaches are used - Further exploration is required about caregivers
specific needs as SDMs
16Caregivers and SDM
- Past research
- Diagnosis
- Gray Zone
- Ethical tensions
17Substitute Decision-Making
- Lack information about
- information gathered about them and developments
of new technology - substitute decision-making
- Resources
- Educational needs
18Substitute Decision-Making
- Means to appoint Substitute Decision-Makers
- Advance Directives (e.g. Mandat en cas
dinaptitude, Procuration) - Legal document allowing participant to appoint a
substitute decision-maker for health purposes,
including research - Research Advance Directives (specifically for
CLSA) - Informed Consent Form allowing participant to
appoint a substitute decision-maker at inception
of the study for purposes of the research only - Research Study Advocates
- Consent Form allowing participant to appoint
professionals with some expertise in substitute
decision-making
19CANADIAN LONGITUDINAL STUDY ON AGING (CLSA)
INFORMED CONSENT PROCESS
CLSA PARTICIPANT
PARTICIPANT BECOMES MENTALLY INCAPACITATED
- OVER TIME MENTAL INCAPACITY DEVELOPS
- possible age-related diseases affecting mental
capacity to provide informed consent
EVALUATE RISK OF PARTICIPATION
MINIMAL RISKS
(non invasive)
PRIVACY CONFIDENTIALITY (DNA, data linkage,
etc.)
Incapable of providing informed consent
- ALZHEIMERS
- VASCULAR DEMENTIA
- MENTAL ILLNESS
OPTIONS
SUBSTITUE DECISION MAKER MECHANISM OF INFORMED
CONSENT
WITHDRAWS
REMAINS IN STUDY
RESEARCH ADVANCED DIRECTIVES
RESEARCH STUDY ADVOCATES
ADVANCED DIRECTIVES
NO FOLLOW-UP INFORMATION AVAILABLE
20Public Engagement
- Public Engagement
- The perspectives of potential participants and
substitute decision-makers are needed - to help identify problems
- to reduce confusion about the CLSA
- to ensure public trust
21Need for Feasibility Study
- Little is known about how Canadians view
providing informed consent if mental incapacity
develops during the course of a longitudinal
observational study
22Main Objective Of Feasibility Study
- EXPLORE HOW POTENTIAL CLSA PARTICIPANTS PERCIEVE
ONGOING INFORMED CONSENT IF MENTAL INCAPACITY
DEVELOPS.
23- Questions under study include
- Would Canadians enrolled in the study be willing
to participate if they became mentally
incapacitated during the course of the study? - Who will make decisions about this study on their
behalf? - If substitute decision-makers are used, how will
they be appointed? What will be their roles and
responsibilities? - What are the risks of participation (e.g., due to
developments in technology, data and/or stored
biological samples that may be used for purposes
that were unforeseen when the study began). - What types of information do participants or
their substitute decision-makers need to
encourage ongoing participation?
24Proposed Methodology
- QUALITATIVE
- Focus groups and interviews
- Participant recruitment
- Potential Participants
- Potential Substitute decision-makers
25- Proposed Methodology
- Complementary Analytic Strategies
- (Maxwell Miller, 1996)
- Categorization (Constant Comparison)
- Contextualization
26- Categorization
- Common elements of experience and group them into
conceptual themes - Contextualization
- Uniqueness of experience and specific context
27- Anticipated results will help
- Appreciate attitudes regarding ethical issues
involving mental incapacity, consent, substitute
decision-making, risks of participation, threats
to personal privacy, and the content and quality
of relevant information provided to the study's
participants - Identify and address challenges to retaining
participants in the CLSA, thus ensuring its
success