Title: Review of UltraWideband Radio Channel Modeling
1Review of Ultra-Wideband Radio Channel Modeling
- Martin Weisenhorn
- Zurich Research Laboratory
- E-mail mwe_at_zurich.ibm.com
2Outline
- Measurement of UWB Channel Impulse Response
- Modeling of Observed Effects
- A Method for Modeling MIMO Channels
- Channel Properties Affecting the Performance of
Communication Systems - Time Variance of UWB Channels
- Bandpass or Passband Representation
3UWB Channel Impulse Response
- Large signal bandwidth 500 MHz 7.5 GHz in the
band 3.1-10.6 GHz (according to FCC rules)
Possible scheme to acquire the impulse response
of a channel
500 MHz
f , t
Source Multispectral Solutions
Source Multispectral Solutions
4UWB Channel Impulse Response
Pulse duration 2 ns - 0.13 ns
Pulse spread 60 cm - 4 cm
Propagation scenario
LOS and NLOS impulse responses
LOS channel
B7.5 GHz
10 20
30
NLOS channel
Receiver
Transmitter
B7.5 GHz
t ns
5UWB Channel Impulse Response
Impact of antenna characteristics on impulse
response
Channel impulse response h(t) from feed point to
feed point depends on antenna impulse responses
- Antenna impulse response
- Frequency
- Elevation ? and azimuth ?
In most measurement campaigns antennas with quite
uniform characteristics, as an approximation to
the isotropic radiator were employed
?
As a consequence, the resulting channel models
are in principle not valid for antennas with
other characteristics
6UWB Channel Impulse Response
Example of a power delay profile
Observed effects
frequency band 1 - 11 GHz
dB
Source ACORDE Univ. of Cantabaria
7Statistical Modeling of the UWB Channel
Grouping of effects
- Small sale effects
- Shape of path impulse response
- Arrival time of path impulse responses
- Small changes of arrival times of path impulse
responses have large impact on the amplitude of
superimposed rays - Large scale effects
- Time decay constant of power delay profile
- Path loss
- Frequency selective path loss
8Path Loss Characterization
4
LOS
NLOS
SNR values achieved in practice
Example
1
1
1
LOS
NLOS
cdf
d20 m
d 4 m
0
SNR dB
-20 0 20 40
9Frequency Selective Path Loss
A frequency dependent path loss is observed from
the power spectral density of channel impulse
responses
A theoretical explanation includes the smaller
effective aperture and higher material dependent
attenuation for higher signal frequencies
The effect can be modeled in the frequency domain
with a filter characteristic
where the m - paramter is in the range (0.8,
1.2), see 1
Source IMST
10Frequency Selective Path Loss
B7.5 GHz
baseband representtion
The impulse response of this filter shows that
only weak correlation is introduced between rays
it should therefore be sufficient to consider the
frequency selective attenuation effect as being
included in the path loss description.
11Statistical Modeling of Impulse Response
Overview on the modeling of different channel
properties
12Statistical Modeling of Impulse Response
Many channel models were proposed, suggesting
different statistics to describe channel impulse
responses
Primary reasons (depend on extraction procedure
of model parameters)
- Different measures were acquired,?, resulting
statistical parameters cannot be compared, e.g. - Antenna characteristics included or excluded
- All rays independent on amplitude considered or
only rays considered with amplitudes beyond a
threshold
Secondary reasons (depending on channel
measurement procedure)
- Different measurement setups, building types,
antenna characteristics were used, different
measurement principle introducing different
systematic errors e.g. - Impulse response samples considered or square
root of energy captured during time bins
considered.
13A Method for Modeling MIMO Channels
Virtual source concept
- Each virtual source causes an individual path
impulse response
- Delays of path impulse responses depend on
transmitter and receiver positions
- Channel impulse responses are functions of the
transmitter and receiver position
- Mixed, deterministic statistical channel model
- Virtual source positions depend deterministically
on room dimensions - Path impulses responses are realizations of a
stochastic process
14Channel Properties Affecting the Performance of
Communication Systems
Cross correlation function
B7.5 GHz
?d cm
- Diagonal lines stem from identical path impulse
responses contained in both received impulse
responses - ACF is concentrated in time
- CCF is concentrated in space
? ns
15Channel Properties Affecting the Performance of
Communication Systems
Cross correlation function
B500 MHz
- Diagonal lines stem from identical path impulse
responses contained in both received impulse
responses - ACF is concentrated in time
- CCF is concentrated in space
16Channel Properties Affecting the Performance of
Communication Systems
Small scale statistics of impulse response energy
- Responsible channel properties
- Fading characteristics of ray amplitudes
- Number of resolvable rays
- UWB channel properties
- Number of resolvable rays is large and increasing
with the channel bandwidth - High diversity offering, increasing with channel
bandwidth
cdf
energy
17Channel Properties Affecting the Performance of
Communication Systems
- Received energy
- Almost constant under small scale motion
- Unlike for narrowband systems, no additional
transmitted power required to overcome deep small
scale fades - High diversity offering due to large number of
resolvable paths - ACF
- Very concentrated in time when compared to delay
spread - ISI robust systems feasible, the more rays
captured the more robust - CCF
- Concentrated in space
- Potential reduction of crosstalk from undesired
users - Small dimensions allowed for antenna arrays (MIMO)
18Time Variance of UWB Channels
- No measurements of real time varying UWB channels
are available
- In a first measurement campaign, static
measurements were made to assess the impact of
obstruction, caused by a single human when
crossing the LOS path
19Time Variance of UWB Channels
Source Steve Schell Bitzmo, Inc 3
20Time Variance of UWB Channels
Channel similarityfrom position to position
- Results for 2000 MHz bandwidth
- mean,min,max,etc over all f of
prediction_error(position)
Source Steve Schell Bitzmo, Inc 3
21Passband or Bandpass Representation
- Narrowband Systems with mixers
- Baseband representation is a natural choice of a
higher layer description - The symbol clock lies on a grid of equal carrier
phases - Channel description is more compact in baseband
representation, signals with much lower
bandwidths involved - UWB Systems not employing mixers
- In UWB transmitters the carrier frequency is not
uniquely defined. - The symbol clock cannot be related to the carrier
phase - Baseband representation requires that every
transmitted symbol has individual complex phase - Signal bandwidth can be reduced only by a factor
in the order of 10 - ? The choice of passband or baseband
representation should possible depend on aspects
of the system implementation
22Conclusion
- A principal difficulty of determining the
generally admitted channel impulse response, is
caused by the directivity of antennas and the
channel itself. - The currently most accepted UWB channel models
statistically describe effects that can be
observed in the time domain exponential power
decay with time, amplitude statistics, arrival
times - A mixed deterministic - stochastic approach can
be used for the modeling of MIMO UWB Channels - The energy of UWB channel impulse responses shows
small variations, when compared to narrowband
channels, correlation functions of channel
impulse responses are concentrated in time and
space. - A first step into the direction of modeling time
variant UWB channels shows that channel tracking
will be a requirement for certain types of
applications - The choice of channel modeling in either baseband
or passband should depend on the system
implementation
23References
1 J. Kunisch and J. Pamp, Measurement results
and modeling aspects for the UWB radio channel,
in Proc. 2002 IEEE Conf. on Ultra Wideband
Systems and Technologies, Baltimore, May 2002,
pp. 19-23.
2 Jeff Foerster, Channel Modeling
Sub-committee Report Final, doc. IEEE
802.15-02/368r5-SG3a, 18 November, 2002,
online. Available http// grouper.ieee.org/grou
ps/802/15/pub/2002/Nov02/
3 Steve Schell, Analysis of Time Variance of a
UWB Propagation Channel doc. IEEE
802.15-02/452r0-SG3a, 5 November 2002, online.
Available http//grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/15/p
ub/2002/Nov02/
4 S. S. Ghassemzadeh and R. Jana and C. W. Rice
and W. Turin and V. Tarok, A Statistical Path
Loss Model for In-Home UWB Channels, IEEE
UWBST-2002 May, 2002
24Amplitude Distribution
Comparison of distributions (1-20m)
LOS
NLOS
Source Intel Research and Development
25Passband or Bandpass Representation
Baseband and passband representation of a channel
model are related by a one to one mapping, having
different statistical descriptions.
Example Baseband Rayleigh fading channel
Uniformal distributed
Gaussian distributed
Rayleigh distributed
26Angle and Time of Arrival
Source R. Jean-Marc Cramer, Robert A. Scholtz,
Moe Z. Win TRW Space and Electronics
27Typical Normalized Antenna Azimuth and Elevation
Patterns (omni-directional antennas)
Soyrce Time Domain
Source Time Domain
28Space Time Picture of Propagating Waves
Source IMST