HbA1C and DM control - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 27
About This Presentation
Title:

HbA1C and DM control

Description:

microvascular complications in type 1 diabetes --slowed by treating hyperglycemia ... Mean progression of intima-media thickness of carotid artery ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:2375
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 28
Provided by: ntuhSi
Category:
Tags: hba1c | control | intima

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: HbA1C and DM control


1
HbA1C and DM control
  • By Ri ???

2
Introduction
  • microvascular complications in type 1 diabetes
    --slowed by treating hyperglycemia
  • ?increased use of intensive insulin regimens
    to attain strict glycemic control
  • The efficacy of these regimens requires an
    accurate method to estimate

3
a given mean blood glucose value ?associated with
different mean glycemic excursions and mean daily
differences
4
Estimation of mean blood glucose by A1C
  • glucose can attach to many proteins via a
    nonenzymatic, posttranslational process
  • (1)A reversible reaction leads to the formation
    of an aldimine
  • (2)followed by an Amadori rearrangement to form
    an irreversible ketoamine.

5
Glycated hemoglobin
  • most widely used clinical test
  • ?measurement of blood glycated hemoglobin (also
    called hemoglobin A1C, glycohemoglobin, and
    glycosylated hemoglobin HbA1c).
  • the average amount of A1C
  • ?changes in a dynamic way
  • ?reflects the mean blood glucose concentration
    over the previous six to eight weeks.  
  • Nathan, DM, Singer, DE, Hurxthal, K.
    Goodson, JD. The clinical information value of
    the glycosylated hemoglobin assay. N Engl J Med
    1984 310341.

6
Diabetes Control and Complications Trial (DCCT)
  • mean blood glucose concentrations from seven
    measurements a day (before and 90 minutes after
    each meals, and before bedtime)
  • ?compared with A1C values in 278 patients with
    type 1 DM
  • A strong correlation
  • A1C value of 7 percent --150 mg/dL
  • A1C value of 9 percent --210 mg/dL

7
Factors causing misleading results
  • A1C values influenced by red cell survival.
  • (1) falsely high values -- low red cell
    turnover--disproportionate number of older red
    cells
  • ex iron, vitamin B12, or folate deficiency
    anemia.
  • (2) falsely low values -- rapid red cell
    turnover
  • greater younger red cells
  • ex hemolysis , treated for iron, vitamin B12,
    or folate deficiency
  • Panzer, S, Kronik, G, Lechner, K, et al.
    Glycosylated hemoglobins (GHb) An index of red
    cell survival. Blood 1982 591348.

8
Fructosamine
  • nonenzymatic glycation ?formation of advanced
    glycosylation end products ?direct role in the
    development of diabetic microvascular
    complications
  • good correlation between serum fructosamine and
    A1C values
  • variation for fructosamine higher than that for
    A1C
  • serum fructosamine values reflect mean blood
    glucose values over a much shorter period of time
    (one to two weeks).

9
About type 1 DM--Introduction
  • nephropathy and retinopathy --more likely to
    occur in patients with poorer glycemic control
  • The risk is highest if HbA1c value above 12
  • Barzilay, J, Warram, JH, Bak, M, et al.
    Predisposition to hypertension risk factor for
    nephropathy and hypertension in IDDM. Kidney
    Int 1992 41723.
  • The severity of hyperglycemia
  • ?correlated with recurrent diabetic nephropathy
    in patients who have received a renal transplant
  • Mauer, SM, Goetz, FC, McHugh, LE, et al.
    Long-term study of normal kidneys transplanted
    into patients with type I diabetes. Diabetes
    1989 38516.

10
Prospective Diabetes Control and Complications
Trial (DCCT)
  • mean A1C values during the nine-year study
  • ?7.2 percent with intensive therapy-- 155 mg/dL
  • 9.1 percent with conventional therapy--235
    mg/dL
  • The DCCT provided conclusive evidence strict
    glycemic control
  • a) delay the onset of microvascular
    complications (primary prevention)
  • b) low the rate of progression of already
    present complications (secondary intervention)

11
Pathogenesis
  • 1. Advanced glycosylation end products (AGE)
  • a) tissue accumulation of AGEs-- crosslinking
    with collagen-- renal and microvascular
    complications
  • b) modify LDL-- less cleared by LDL receptors
    -- hyperlipidemia commonly present in diabetic
    patients
  • 2. Sorbitol
  • a) accumulation within the cells --rise
    intracellular osmolality and decrease
    intracellular myoinositol-- interfere with cell
    metabolism
  • b) major contribution of sorbitol --the
    cataract formation induced by hyperglycemia
     Lee, AY, Chung, SK, Chung, SS.
  • Demonstration that polyol accumulation is
    responsible for diabetic cataract by the use of
    transgenic mice expressing the aldose reductase
    gene in the lens. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1995
    922780.

12
Retinopathy
  • major end-point in many of the prospective
    diabetes trials because it is the most common
    microvascular complications
  • the incidence of new retinopathy
  • ?12 in the intensive therapy group
  • 54 in the conventional therapy group.
  • progressive retinopathy -- uncommon at A1C values
    below 7

13
the risk of severe hypoglycemic episodes was
also continuously, but inversely, related to
glycemic controlranging from approximately 105
to 25 episodes per 100 patient-years at mean A1C
values of 5.5 and 10.5 percent, respectively
14
Established retinopathy
  • intensive insulin therapy -- slow the rate of
    progression of mild to moderate retinopathy.
  • The incidence of worsening retinopathy in
    intensively treated patients -- higher than in
    those receiving conventional therapy at one year
    (7.4 versus 3 percent) but much lower at nine
    years (25 versus 53 percent).

15
Intensive insulin therapy for 6.5 years during
the DCCT reduced the risk of retinopathy over the
next seven years despite an increase in A1C
values. Effect of intensive therapy on the
microvascular complications of type 1 diabetes
mellitus. AMA 2002 2872563.
16
Nephropathy
  • DCCT included many patients with no detectable
    microalbuminuria at baseline.
  • After 6.5 years of study, the prevalence of
    new microalbuminuria -- much lower with intensive
    therapy-- 16 versus 27
  • The Diabetes Control and Complications Trial
    Research Group. The effect of intensive treatment
    of diabetes on the development and progression of
    long-term complications in insulin-dependent
    diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med 1993.
  • the benefits of intensive therapy for primary
    prevention of nephropathy persist for a number of
    years

17
strict glycemic control with intensive insulin
therapy-- not slow the rate of progressive renal
injury once overt proteinuria developed (albumin
excretion greater than 300 mg/day).
  • At late stage--often marked glomerulosclerosis.
  • Only antihypertensive therapy (preferably with
    ACEI) and perhaps dietary protein restriction
  • --slow the rate of progressive disease or
    reverse established lesions.

18
Neuropathy
  • Intensive insulin therapy --
  • ? reduced the incidence of abnormal nerve
    conduction
  • ?associated with improvement in nerve
    conduction velocity
  • The Oslo study -- graded effect of hyperglycemia
    on disease progression
  • ?each 1 rise in A1C values associated with
    1.3 m/sec slowing of nerve conduction at eight
    years   Amthor, KF, Dahl-Jorgensen, K, Berg, TJ,
    et al. The effect of 8 years of strict glycaemic
    control on peripheral nerve function in IDDM
    patients The Oslo Study. Diabetologia 1994
    37579

19
Macrovascular disease
  • nonsignificant trend toward fewer cardiovascular
    events with intensive therapy (3.2 versus 5.4
    percent, p 0.08)
  • The intensive insulin therapy group -- lower
    serum LDL but some weight gain due to the
    increase in insulin administration
  • Mean progression of intima-media thickness of
    carotid artery
  • ?significantly less in intensive therapy
    compared with conventional therapy (0.032 versus
    0.046 mm).
  • ?not known about reduction in cardiovascular
    disease-related events.

20
About type 2 diabetes mellitus- The United
Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS)
  • strict control also reduced risk of
    microvascular disease in type 2 DM
  • Over 10 years, the average A1C value was 7.0
    percent in the intensive-therapy group compared
    with 7.9 percent in the conventional-therapy
    group

21
Most of the risk reduction in the intensive
therapy group --due to 25 risk reduction in
microvascular disease (P 0.001) There was no
reduction in macrovascular disease.
  • The benefits of intensive therapy -independent of
    the type of treatment administered.
  • The reduction in microvascular complications in
    intensive therapy -- a smaller magnitude than in
    patients with type 1 diabetes in the DCCT

22
Macrovascular disease in type 2DM
  • Conflicting data on the importance of glycemic
    control on the development of macrovascular
    disease in type 2 DM
  • To date, no randomized clinical trial has
    convincingly demonstrated a beneficial effect of
    intensive therapy on macrovascular outcomes in
    type 2 DM
  • The most effective approach for prevention of
    both micro- and macrovascular complications
  • ?multifactorial risk factor reduction
  • (glycemic control, stopping smoking,
    aggressive blood pressure control, treatment of
    dyslipidemia, and daily aspirin).

23
Summary(1-1)-Type 1 DM
  • strict glycemic control-- before irreversible
    end-organ damage -- reduces the incidence of
    microvascular disease and neurologic dysfunction
    in type 1 diabetes.
  • From a renal viewpoint, this regimen --
    beneficial in all patients except overt
    proteinuria in whom strict blood pressure control
    with an ACE inhibitor appears to be more
    important
  • Beginning intensive therapy as early as possible
    after the diagnosis and measure HbA1C three to
    six months.

24
Summary(1-2)-Type 1 DM
  • In general, we aim for a A1C value of
    approximately 7 in optimally compliant and
    non-pregnant patients.
  • Achieve A1C lt7 should only be considered
  • a) hypoglycemia is not an important problem
  • b) during pregnancy in type 1 and type 2
    diabetic women, since the demonstrated benefits
    to the fetus and neonate drive the therapeutic
    goals.

25
Summary(2-1)-Type 2 DM
  • Outcomes improved for every 1 drop in A1C and
    there was no threshold effect, a reasonable goal
    of therapy might be a A1C value of 7.0 for most
    patients
  • The ADA also recommends a target of less than 7.0
    for most patients, while the American Academy
    of Clinical Endocrinologists (AACE) and the
    European Association for the Study of Diabetes
    (EASD) both recommend a target of A1C less than
    6.5

26
Summary(2-1)-Type 2 DM
  • From a practical standpoint, we are limited from
    pushing A1C lower due to increased risk of
    hypoglycemia, weight gain, and the cost of using
    multiple drugs to achieve the goal
  • Vigorous cardiac risk reduction (smoking
    cessation, aspirin, blood pressure, reduction in
    serum lipids, diet, exercise, and, in high-risk
    patients, an ACEI) should be a top priority for
    all patients with type 2 diabetes
  • The HbA1C goal should be set somewhat higher for
    older patients and those with a limited life
    expectancy.

27
?
?
?
?
? ? ? ?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com