Title: HbA1C and DM control
1HbA1C and DM control
2Introduction
- microvascular complications in type 1 diabetes
--slowed by treating hyperglycemia - ?increased use of intensive insulin regimens
to attain strict glycemic control - The efficacy of these regimens requires an
accurate method to estimate
3a given mean blood glucose value ?associated with
different mean glycemic excursions and mean daily
differences
4Estimation of mean blood glucose by A1C
- glucose can attach to many proteins via a
nonenzymatic, posttranslational process - (1)A reversible reaction leads to the formation
of an aldimine - (2)followed by an Amadori rearrangement to form
an irreversible ketoamine.
5Glycated hemoglobin
- most widely used clinical test
- ?measurement of blood glycated hemoglobin (also
called hemoglobin A1C, glycohemoglobin, and
glycosylated hemoglobin HbA1c). - the average amount of A1C
- ?changes in a dynamic way
- ?reflects the mean blood glucose concentration
over the previous six to eight weeks. - Nathan, DM, Singer, DE, Hurxthal, K.
Goodson, JD. The clinical information value of
the glycosylated hemoglobin assay. N Engl J Med
1984 310341.
6Diabetes Control and Complications Trial (DCCT)
- mean blood glucose concentrations from seven
measurements a day (before and 90 minutes after
each meals, and before bedtime) - ?compared with A1C values in 278 patients with
type 1 DM - A strong correlation
- A1C value of 7 percent --150 mg/dL
- A1C value of 9 percent --210 mg/dL
7 Factors causing misleading results
- A1C values influenced by red cell survival.
- (1) falsely high values -- low red cell
turnover--disproportionate number of older red
cells - ex iron, vitamin B12, or folate deficiency
anemia. - (2) falsely low values -- rapid red cell
turnover - greater younger red cells
- ex hemolysis , treated for iron, vitamin B12,
or folate deficiency - Panzer, S, Kronik, G, Lechner, K, et al.
Glycosylated hemoglobins (GHb) An index of red
cell survival. Blood 1982 591348.
8Fructosamine
- nonenzymatic glycation ?formation of advanced
glycosylation end products ?direct role in the
development of diabetic microvascular
complications - good correlation between serum fructosamine and
A1C values - variation for fructosamine higher than that for
A1C - serum fructosamine values reflect mean blood
glucose values over a much shorter period of time
(one to two weeks).
9About type 1 DM--Introduction
- nephropathy and retinopathy --more likely to
occur in patients with poorer glycemic control - The risk is highest if HbA1c value above 12
- Barzilay, J, Warram, JH, Bak, M, et al.
Predisposition to hypertension risk factor for
nephropathy and hypertension in IDDM. Kidney
Int 1992 41723. -
- The severity of hyperglycemia
- ?correlated with recurrent diabetic nephropathy
in patients who have received a renal transplant
- Mauer, SM, Goetz, FC, McHugh, LE, et al.
Long-term study of normal kidneys transplanted
into patients with type I diabetes. Diabetes
1989 38516.
10Prospective Diabetes Control and Complications
Trial (DCCT)
- mean A1C values during the nine-year study
- ?7.2 percent with intensive therapy-- 155 mg/dL
- 9.1 percent with conventional therapy--235
mg/dL - The DCCT provided conclusive evidence strict
glycemic control - a) delay the onset of microvascular
complications (primary prevention) - b) low the rate of progression of already
present complications (secondary intervention)
11Pathogenesis
- 1. Advanced glycosylation end products (AGE)
- a) tissue accumulation of AGEs-- crosslinking
with collagen-- renal and microvascular
complications -
- b) modify LDL-- less cleared by LDL receptors
-- hyperlipidemia commonly present in diabetic
patients - 2. Sorbitol
- a) accumulation within the cells --rise
intracellular osmolality and decrease
intracellular myoinositol-- interfere with cell
metabolism - b) major contribution of sorbitol --the
cataract formation induced by hyperglycemia
Lee, AY, Chung, SK, Chung, SS. - Demonstration that polyol accumulation is
responsible for diabetic cataract by the use of
transgenic mice expressing the aldose reductase
gene in the lens. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1995
922780.
12Retinopathy
- major end-point in many of the prospective
diabetes trials because it is the most common
microvascular complications - the incidence of new retinopathy
- ?12 in the intensive therapy group
- 54 in the conventional therapy group.
- progressive retinopathy -- uncommon at A1C values
below 7
13the risk of severe hypoglycemic episodes was
also continuously, but inversely, related to
glycemic controlranging from approximately 105
to 25 episodes per 100 patient-years at mean A1C
values of 5.5 and 10.5 percent, respectively
14Established retinopathy
- intensive insulin therapy -- slow the rate of
progression of mild to moderate retinopathy. - The incidence of worsening retinopathy in
intensively treated patients -- higher than in
those receiving conventional therapy at one year
(7.4 versus 3 percent) but much lower at nine
years (25 versus 53 percent).
15Intensive insulin therapy for 6.5 years during
the DCCT reduced the risk of retinopathy over the
next seven years despite an increase in A1C
values. Effect of intensive therapy on the
microvascular complications of type 1 diabetes
mellitus. AMA 2002 2872563.
16Nephropathy
- DCCT included many patients with no detectable
microalbuminuria at baseline. - After 6.5 years of study, the prevalence of
new microalbuminuria -- much lower with intensive
therapy-- 16 versus 27 - The Diabetes Control and Complications Trial
Research Group. The effect of intensive treatment
of diabetes on the development and progression of
long-term complications in insulin-dependent
diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med 1993. - the benefits of intensive therapy for primary
prevention of nephropathy persist for a number of
years
17strict glycemic control with intensive insulin
therapy-- not slow the rate of progressive renal
injury once overt proteinuria developed (albumin
excretion greater than 300 mg/day).
- At late stage--often marked glomerulosclerosis.
- Only antihypertensive therapy (preferably with
ACEI) and perhaps dietary protein restriction - --slow the rate of progressive disease or
reverse established lesions.
18Neuropathy
- Intensive insulin therapy --
- ? reduced the incidence of abnormal nerve
conduction - ?associated with improvement in nerve
conduction velocity - The Oslo study -- graded effect of hyperglycemia
on disease progression - ?each 1 rise in A1C values associated with
1.3 m/sec slowing of nerve conduction at eight
years Amthor, KF, Dahl-Jorgensen, K, Berg, TJ,
et al. The effect of 8 years of strict glycaemic
control on peripheral nerve function in IDDM
patients The Oslo Study. Diabetologia 1994
37579
19Macrovascular disease
- nonsignificant trend toward fewer cardiovascular
events with intensive therapy (3.2 versus 5.4
percent, p 0.08) - The intensive insulin therapy group -- lower
serum LDL but some weight gain due to the
increase in insulin administration - Mean progression of intima-media thickness of
carotid artery - ?significantly less in intensive therapy
compared with conventional therapy (0.032 versus
0.046 mm). - ?not known about reduction in cardiovascular
disease-related events.
20About type 2 diabetes mellitus- The United
Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS)
- strict control also reduced risk of
microvascular disease in type 2 DM - Over 10 years, the average A1C value was 7.0
percent in the intensive-therapy group compared
with 7.9 percent in the conventional-therapy
group
21Most of the risk reduction in the intensive
therapy group --due to 25 risk reduction in
microvascular disease (P 0.001) There was no
reduction in macrovascular disease.
- The benefits of intensive therapy -independent of
the type of treatment administered. - The reduction in microvascular complications in
intensive therapy -- a smaller magnitude than in
patients with type 1 diabetes in the DCCT
22Macrovascular disease in type 2DM
- Conflicting data on the importance of glycemic
control on the development of macrovascular
disease in type 2 DM -
- To date, no randomized clinical trial has
convincingly demonstrated a beneficial effect of
intensive therapy on macrovascular outcomes in
type 2 DM - The most effective approach for prevention of
both micro- and macrovascular complications - ?multifactorial risk factor reduction
- (glycemic control, stopping smoking,
aggressive blood pressure control, treatment of
dyslipidemia, and daily aspirin).
23Summary(1-1)-Type 1 DM
- strict glycemic control-- before irreversible
end-organ damage -- reduces the incidence of
microvascular disease and neurologic dysfunction
in type 1 diabetes. - From a renal viewpoint, this regimen --
beneficial in all patients except overt
proteinuria in whom strict blood pressure control
with an ACE inhibitor appears to be more
important - Beginning intensive therapy as early as possible
after the diagnosis and measure HbA1C three to
six months.
24Summary(1-2)-Type 1 DM
- In general, we aim for a A1C value of
approximately 7 in optimally compliant and
non-pregnant patients. - Achieve A1C lt7 should only be considered
- a) hypoglycemia is not an important problem
- b) during pregnancy in type 1 and type 2
diabetic women, since the demonstrated benefits
to the fetus and neonate drive the therapeutic
goals.
25Summary(2-1)-Type 2 DM
- Outcomes improved for every 1 drop in A1C and
there was no threshold effect, a reasonable goal
of therapy might be a A1C value of 7.0 for most
patients - The ADA also recommends a target of less than 7.0
for most patients, while the American Academy
of Clinical Endocrinologists (AACE) and the
European Association for the Study of Diabetes
(EASD) both recommend a target of A1C less than
6.5
26Summary(2-1)-Type 2 DM
- From a practical standpoint, we are limited from
pushing A1C lower due to increased risk of
hypoglycemia, weight gain, and the cost of using
multiple drugs to achieve the goal - Vigorous cardiac risk reduction (smoking
cessation, aspirin, blood pressure, reduction in
serum lipids, diet, exercise, and, in high-risk
patients, an ACEI) should be a top priority for
all patients with type 2 diabetes -
- The HbA1C goal should be set somewhat higher for
older patients and those with a limited life
expectancy.
27?
?
?
?
? ? ? ?