ProteinLigand Interactions: Induced Fit - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 19
About This Presentation
Title:

ProteinLigand Interactions: Induced Fit

Description:

Lock and Key' (Emil Fischer, end 20th century) ... the crystallized unbound conformational isomer. Difference between the conformers (backbone) ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:284
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 20
Provided by: Jan383
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: ProteinLigand Interactions: Induced Fit


1
Protein-Ligand InteractionsInduced Fit
  • Jan Bollen

2
Overview
  • Introduction
  • Protein folding and Binding Mechanisms
  • Hinge-bending Conformational Transitions
  • Allosteric and Nonallosteric Enzymes
  • Functional Groups and Binding Epitopes
  • Conclusion

3
Overview
  • Introduction
  • Protein folding and Binding Mechanisms
  • Hinge-bending Conformational Transitions
  • Allosteric and Nonallosteric Enzymes
  • Functional Groups and Binding Epitopes
  • Conclusion

4
Introduction
  • Lock and Key (Emil Fischer, end 20th century)
  • Induced Fit (Koshland, 1958)
  • Within the new view of protein folding
  • (Dill and Chan, 1997)

5
Introduction
  • Lock and Key (Emil Fischer, end 20th century)
  • Best illustrated by enzyme substrate-binding
    process
  • Active site rigid en sturdy lock
  • Active site exact fit to only one key
    (substrate).

6
Introduction
  • Induced Fit (Koshland, 1958)
  • Proteins no rigid locks
  • Accommodate the substrate by adapting the binding
    site

7
Introduction
  • New View of protein folding (Dill and Chan,
    1997)
  • Energy Funnels
  • Energy VS conformation
  • U1 and U2 fold by proceeding directly down the
    walls of the funnel to the native state
  • U3 first forms an intermediate state, that must
    then be unfolded before the protein can reach N
  • Unfolding requires energy be put into the
    protein so that it can escape that
    particular "pit", and thus intermediates
    represent traps.

8
Introduction
  • Allosteric and non allosteric enzymes

9
Introduction
  • Within the new view of protein folding (Dill
    and Chan, 1997)
  • Protein-ligand complex fusion between the energy
    landscapes
  • In reality more rugged landscapes
  • degree of rugged depends on flexibility of
    P/L/P-L
  • For binding mechanisms focus on the bottoms of
    the funnels
  • Rigid proteins single/few minima
  • Flexible proteins rugged, with low barriers,
    corresponds to a range of conformations.

10
Overview
  • Introduction
  • Protein folding and Binding Mechanisms
  • Hinge-bending Conformational Transitions
  • Allosteric and Nonallosteric Enzymes
  • Conclusion

11
Protein folding and Binding Mechanisms
  • Binding mechanism
  • assigned via a comparison of the structures of
  • the crystallized bound conformer
  • the crystallized unbound conformational isomer
  • Difference between the conformers (backbone)
  • Small lock and key
  • Big Induced fit
  • But, the difference between the conformers does
    not necessarily mean induced fit
  • Why?
  • Crystal of bound bound to the ligand
  • Crystal of unboud also bound but to its twin
    molecule

12
Protein folding and Binding Mechanisms
  • Binding mechanism
  • No need to invoke lock and key or the induced
    fit!
  • Consider the variability of the conformers.
  • In all cases the conformer that binds is the one
    most favorable and complementary
  • Different conformers may well bind different
    ligands
  • Thus, the larger the flexibility, the wider the
    scope of binding specificity
  • Nevertheless, in solution sidechains move, some
    induced fit is not precluded, optimizing the
    receptor-ligand interactions.

13
Overview
  • Introduction
  • Protein folding and Binding Mechanisms
  • Hinge-bending Conformational Transitions
  • Allosteric and Nonallosteric Enzymes
  • Conclusion

14
Hinge-bending Conformational Transitions
  • No detail, can also be explained by funnels

15
Overview
  • Introduction
  • Protein folding and Binding Mechanisms
  • Hinge-bending Conformational Transitions
  • Allosteric and Nonallosteric Enzymes
  • Conclusion

16
Allosteric and Nonallosteric Enzymes
  • The majority of the conformational changes in
    allosteric regulation involve subunit motions.
  • Binding of the inhibitor favours the T state.
  • Binding of the activator favours the R state.
  • Allostery is related to the concept of funnels.
  • But, as the system is larger, and more
    conformations are possible, the funnels will be
    more complex.
  • The bottom of the folding funnels are populated
    by ensemble of conformations of single proteins.
  • The bottom of the binding funnels by an ensemble
    of bound conformations.

17
Allosteric and Nonallosteric Enzymes
  • For allosterically regulated proteins, there are
    additional considerations.
  • First, allostery is often observed in a
    quaternary molecular assembly, involving several
    subunits.
  • Second, the binding of the inducer needs to be
    considered, in addition to the substrate.
  • ?Hence, allostery involves large multimolecular
    complexes, with higherdimensional, complex
    funnels.

18
Overview
  • Introduction
  • Protein folding and Binding Mechanisms
  • Hinge-bending Conformational Transitions
  • Allosteric and Nonallosteric Enzymes
  • Conclusion

19
Conclusion
  • The new view of protein folding can be extended
    to explain the concepts behind the theories of
    Induced Fit and Lock and Key binding.
  • The energy funnel is equally useful in
    understanding protein function.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com