DEFAMATION LAW IN IRELAND - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 13
About This Presentation
Title:

DEFAMATION LAW IN IRELAND

Description:

But the right of freedom of expression in Ireland is not absolute ... That rather archaic definition has given way to a more modern one: a defamatory ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:189
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 14
Provided by: OCon45
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: DEFAMATION LAW IN IRELAND


1
DEFAMATION LAW IN IRELAND
  • Augustine O Connell
  • MSc (Comp Sc) MBCS

2
  • Balance of rights
  • Article 40.6.1.i of the Irish Constitution says
    that the State guarantees the right of citizens
    to express freely their convictions and opinions.
    But the right of freedom of expression in Ireland
    is not absolute
  • The right of freedom of speech is also guaranteed
    by Article 10 (1) of the European Human Rights
    Convention

3
  • as are necessary in a democratic society in the
    interests of national security, territorial
    integrity or public safety, for the prevention of
    disorder or crime, for the protection of health
    or morals, for the protection of the reputation
    or rights of others, for preventing the
    disclosure of information received in confidence
    or for maintaining the authority and impartiality
    of the judiciary

4
What is defamation?
  • The traditional definition of defamation was
    publication of a false statement, which subjected
    a person to hatred, ridicule or contempt. That
    rather archaic definition has given way to a more
    modern one a defamatory statement is one that
    tends to lower the reputation of the subject in
    the eyes of right-thinking people

5
  • Defamation is divided into two forms libel and
    slander. Historically, libel was the written form
    of defamation, while slander was the spoken form.
    A defamatory statement broadcast on radio or
    television or the Internet would be regarded as
    libellous, rather than slanderous. The
    essential practical difference between libel and
    slander nowadays is that, in a slander action,
    the plaintiff (that is the person bringing the
    action) has to prove that the words caused him
    actual damage, financial or otherwise.

6
  • An actionable defamatory statement has three
    ingredients
  • it must be published,
  • it must refer to the complainant and
  • it must be false.

7
Publication
  • A defamatory statement is only actionable if it
    is published. In the 1840 case of Ahern v
    Maguire, Chief Baron Brady said that, if a letter
    however slanderous, is received only by the
    person to whom it is addressed, and does not go
    beyond him, there is no publication of it in law
    to support an action for libel. (But a wrongly
    addressed letter containing defamatory remarks
    would be actionable if opened by someone other
    than the subject of the remarks.)

8
Defence of justification
  • Only a false statement is actionable. But
    defamation differs from other torts in that a
    statement will be presumed to be defamatory until
    proved otherwise. If a defendant wishes to plead
    justification as a defence, he has to prove the
    truth of the statement. It is not up to the
    complainant to prove that the original statement
    was false.

9
Fair comment
  • In order to plead fair comment, the publisher
    must be able to show that
  • the report was on a matter of public interest
  • the statement was a comment, rather than a fact
    and
  • the comment was fair, in that the belief was
    honestly held
  • It is a matter for the court to decide whether
    words are facts or comments.

10
Privilege
  • If a statement is privileged, a potential
    plaintiff has no cause of action. There are two
    types of privilege absolute privilege and
    qualified privilege. In the case of absolute
    privilege, the intentions of the publisher are
    irrelevant.

11
Reasonable care
  • The Law Reform Commission recommended that a
    publisher should be allowed to plead in his
    defence that he had exercised reasonable care
    prior to publication in attempting to ascertain
    the truth of the allegation. But so far, this
    proposal is not part of Irish law, and the
    defence of reasonable care will not be enough to
    prevent an action for defamation (although it may
    mitigate damages.)

12
Damages
  • Damages in a defamation case may be high enough
    to put a media organisation out of business -
    even before considering the matter of legal
    costs. Because of the high risk of defending a
    defamation action, the unpredictability of juries
    and the heavy legal costs of a hearing, the
    majority of libel cases are settled before coming
    to court.

13
DEFAMATION ACT 1961
  • The law of defamation in Ireland is governed by
    the Constitution, Common Law and the Defamation
    Act 1961. That Act repeals a number of previous
    pieces of legislation - including the Act of
    Slaunder, passed at the time of King Henry VIII
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com