Assessing Public Opinion and its Role in Democracy - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 34
About This Presentation
Title:

Assessing Public Opinion and its Role in Democracy

Description:

Assessing Public Opinion and its ... Public opinion polling typically presumes people have genuine attitudes about ... value ambivalence is not very widespread ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:55
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 35
Provided by: alwaysp
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Assessing Public Opinion and its Role in Democracy


1
Assessing Public Opinion and its Role in Democracy
Public Opinion and Political Participation
  • February 14

2
Genuine Attitudes?
  • Public opinion polling typically presumes people
    have genuine attitudes about the topics in the
    poll
  • How safe is that assumption?

3
Genuine Attitudes?
  • Information levels among the public low
  • Can genuine attitudes exist based on low
    information levels?
  • Do people have coherent preferences and an
    underlying basis for them?

4
Political Attitudes?
  • Core Values and Political Attitudes
  • William G. Jacoby
  • Interested in the impact of values on political
    attitudes
  • Both terms, but especially values, lack
    consistent definitions among public opinion
    scholars

5
Defining Values
  • Jacoby defines values as each individuals
    abstract, general conceptions about the desirable
    and undesirable end states of human life. As
    such values provide criteria for evaluating
    external stimuli and interacting with other
    elements of the social environment. They
    effectively define what is good and bad in
    the world.

6
Defining Values
  • Values differ from
  • Norms
  • Beliefs
  • Ideology
  • Culture
  • Values influence attitudes

7
Hierarchy of Values?
  • Jacobys research questions
  • Do people possess fully ordered value
    hierarchies?
  • Can people rank order their feelings about
    specific values into a complete hierarchy?

8
Values Hierarchy
  • If people possess a complete value hierarchy,
    then choices between pairs of values should be
    transitive.
  • If value A is chosen over value B and value B is
    chosen over value C, then value A should be
    chosen over value C

9
Hierarchy of Values?
  • 1994 Multi-Investigator Study
  • Phone interviews
  • 1464 respondents

10
Hierarchy of Values?
  • Now lets talk about things that are important
    for our society such as liberty, equality,
    economic security, and social order. Before we
    get to the questions, let me first explain what
    we mean by these ideas.
  • By LIBERTY we mean a guarantee of the widest
    freedom possible for everyone to act and think as
    they consider most appropriate.
  • By EQUALITY we mean narrowing the gap in wealth
    and power between the rich and the poor.
  • By ECONOMIC SECURITY we mean the guarantee of a
    steady job and a decent income.
  • By SOCIAL ORDER we mean being able to live in an
    orderly and peaceful society where the laws are
    respected and enforced.
  • All four of these ideas are important, but
    sometimes we have to choose between what is more
    important and what is less important. In your
    opinion, as things stand right now, which is more
    important for our country liberty or equality?
  • How about economic security or social order? As
    things now stand, which do you feel is more
    important for our country?
  • How about liberty or economic security?
  • How about equality or social order?
  • How about liberty or social order?
  • How about equality or economic security?

11
Hierarchy of Values?
  • 78.6 of respondents gave fully transitive
    choices
  • Social order appears less important than the
    other choices to most people

12
(No Transcript)
13
(No Transcript)
14
(No Transcript)
15
(No Transcript)
16
(No Transcript)
17
(No Transcript)
18
(No Transcript)
19
Jacobys Contributions
  • Shows
  • people possess meaningful value hierarchies
  • value ambivalence is not very widespread
  • considerable variability exists from one person
    to the next in their rankings of value importance
  • value choices affect attitudes on issues

20
Evaluating Polls
  • Poll Topics
  • Is the survey measuring genuine attitudes or
    nonattitudes?
  • Have the researchers made any effort to screen
    out respondents who lack genuine attitudes on the
    topic?

21
Evaluating Polls
  • The Questions
  • Are the questions biased, loaded, or leading?
  • Do the questions accurately reflect the topic
    under study?
  • Are there multiple questions on the same topic
    within the same survey? What nuances in public
    opinion do they reveal?
  • Could the ordering of questions influence answers?

22
Evaluating Polls
  • Sampling Procedure
  • Is the poll scientific?
  • How was the sample obtained?
  • Does each member of the population of interest
    have an equal chance of being surveyed?
  • What is the sampling error?

23
Evaluating Polls
  • Interviewing Procedures
  • What was the method of interviewing?
  • How might that affect answers given or response
    rates?

24
Evaluating Polls
  • Interpreting Results
  • Are claims made about subsets of the sample? Is
    the larger sampling error for these results
    reported?
  • Do the poll sponsors have a vested claim in the
    outcome?
  • Do the conclusions follow from the data?
  • Are there alternative ways to interpret the same
    results?

25
Polling and Democracy
  • The by the people view.
  • Responsiveness requires information.
  • What does the public want?
  • Polling, if conducted properly can provide this
    information.
  • The for the people view
  • some people argue that politicians should NOT be
    responsive to polls

26
Polling and Democracy
  • A mixed record
  • Public opinion polling practices
  • Public attitudes
  • Government responsiveness

27
Midterm
  • Two main components
  • Identification of terms or short explanatory
    answers
  • Explain what they mean (examples are helpful) and
    why they are important or significant
  • Critical thinking and application of knowledge.
    This might take some of the following forms
  • Interpret results
  • Identify what information is missing that would
    be needed to identify whether or how much the
    results can be trusted

28
Midterm Review
  • 1/12
  • Terms
  • straw polls
  • FRUGing
  • Push polls
  • Also be prepared to discuss
  • polling pitfalls
  • Polling and democracy

29
Midterm Review
  • 1/17
  • Framing
  • Priming
  • Question wording effects Biased questions know
    different types
  • Response choice effects
  • Question order effects

30
Midterm Review
  • 1/19
  • random sampling
  • Cluster sampling
  • sampling error
  • RDD and related issues
  • Weighting and related issues
  • A few pros and cons for each interviewing type
    how interviewing type may affect responses

31
Midterm Review
  • 1/24
  • Nonattitudes
  • Ways of dealing with nonattitudes
  • Public Affairs Act experiment
  • Ways of dealing with nonattitudes

32
Midterm Review
  • 1/26
  • What information is needed to judge the accuracy
    or credibility of poll results? (material from
    other dates also relevant)

33
Midterm Review
  • 1/31
  • attitudes and their components
  • descriptive statistics and statistical terms
    (know well enough to be able to interpret a
    figure or table like one in the articles assigned
    and discussed in class)

34
Midterm Review
  • More details Thursday.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com