ECONOMICS 3200M Lecture 19 March 27, 2006

1 / 15
About This Presentation
Title:

ECONOMICS 3200M Lecture 19 March 27, 2006

Description:

... companies (basis for competitive advantage), aircraft manufacturers ... possible) to reduce sales volumes and accumulation of scrap for future re-sale ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:35
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 16
Provided by: laz95

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: ECONOMICS 3200M Lecture 19 March 27, 2006


1
ECONOMICS 3200MLecture 19March 27, 2006
2
Advertising
  • Sales/marketing
  • Segmentation of customers
  • Individuals income, ethnicity, age, education,
    etc., strategies of rivals
  • Firms size, location, alternative sources of
    supply, strategies of rivals
  • Advertising strategies and budgets different
    media
  • Trade shows
  • Internal sales force vs. independent sales agents
    exclusive arrangements
  • Technical skills pharmaceutical companies
    (basis for competitive advantage), aircraft
    manufacturers
  • Internet sites
  • Distribution channels commission overrides,
    promotional budgets

3
Advertising
  • Profit maximization and advertising
  • P P(Q, A) ? inverse demand function with demand
    depending upon quantum of advertising
    expenditures
  • Past advertising expenditures investment
    capital stock
  • Possibility of depreciation of stock of
    advertising rate of depreciation may vary with
    media
  • Profit function P(Q, A)Q C(Q) A
  • Profit maximization conditions
  • MRMC
  • Q?P/ ?Q P ?C/ ?Q
  • Q ?P/ ?A 1 ? A/PQ ?A/?
  • However, different media for reaching consumers
    relative importance of informational vs.
    persuasive advertising
  • Prisoners dilemma

4
Advertising
  • Marketing/sales/advertising as entry barriers
  • Example of pharmaceutical companies (big pharma)
    and control of distribution channel doctors for
    prescription medicines
  • Sunk cost for incumbents
  • Increase entry costs
  • Legal restrictions on false or misleading
    advertising

5
Durable Products
  • Definition of durable products useful lifetime
    (provides services/value to consumers) exceeds
    length of time period between price revisions or
    basic time period
  • Durable products
  • Demand depends upon costs to consumers/customer
    per unit of service provided per period of time
  • Autos provide transportation and other services
    over their useful lives
  • Per unit per period costs
  • Expected life-span of product
  • Service per period of time without maintenance
  • Re-sale value
  • Maintenance costs (maintain quality/reliability/pe
    rformance)

6
Durable Products
  • Durable products offered by monopolist at 2
    different dates are substitutes
  • Monopolist creates own competition sell today,
    reduce demand tomorrow (assuming no growth in
    market)
  • With lower residual demand in period 2,monopoly
    price in period 2 lt period 1
  • Rational expectations by consumers expect lower
    prices in future, thus decrease demand in period
    1
  • Non-rational expectations
  • Only consumers with V(utility) gt P1(1) buy in
    period 1
  • Only consumers with V lt P1(1) available in period
    2 residual demand in period 2

7
V, P
P1(1)
P2(2)
MC
D(1)
D(2)
MR(1)
MR(2)
Q
Q1(1)
Q2(2)
8
Durable Products
  • Durable products offered by monopolist at 2
    different dates are substitutes
  • With rational expectations, group of consumers
    with V ? P1(1), P1(1) ? and (1?)V- P1(1) lt
    ?V- P2(2) (has product for two periods) ? )V-
    P1(1) lt ?P1(1)- P2(2) shift demand to period 2
  • Lower demand in period 1 leads to price lt P1(1)
    in period 1
  • Residual demand in period 2 may or may not be
    higher

9
Durable Products
  • Monopoly and planned obsolescence
  • By reducing durability, monopolist reduces stocks
    carried forward to future time periods
  • Increases future period residual demands and
    future prices, making waiting less attractive ?
    increases demand in period 1
  • Fashion products
  • PLC reputation, entry barriers

10
Durable Products
  • Coase conjecture durable product monopolist that
    sells has less market power than monopolist that
    rents/leases
  • If customer buys product in period 1, unlikely
    to buy same product in period 2
  • Monopolist that sells has incentive to cut price
    in future time periods, but not in case of
    monopolist that rents/leases

11
Durable Products
  • Example 1 Monopolist who produces product that
    can be recycled in future aluminum and scrap
  • Higher price in period 1 (than in case where
    recycling not possible) to reduce sales volumes
    and accumulation of scrap for future re-sale
  • Delay competition from scrap

12
Durable Products
  • Example 2 Product has useful life span of X
    years but becomes technologically obsolete after
    ZltX years
  • Consumers willing to pay maximum price (P) per
    year for Z years value of annual services
    provided
  • Maximum price consumers willing to pay at
    beginning of period 1 PV of lease payments,
    assuming that future prices P
  • If at some future time T (0ltTltZ) price
    expected to fall below maximum lease price (P),
    consumers will prefer to lease on annual basis
    and wait till time T to buy product
  • Maximum price consumers willing to pay in this
    case at beginning of period 1 less than in case
    where price not expected to fall below P until
    time period Z
  • Because of life cycle and technological
    obsolescence, producers will decrease price over
    time
  • Consumers must choose when to buy product and
    price to pay

13
Durable Products
  • Example 2 Product has useful life span of X
    years but becomes technologically obsolete after
    ZltX years
  • Price in period 2 should decline to PV of lease
    payments over remaining life (Z-1 Years)
  • Similarly for all future prices
  • With this pricing strategy, consumers will buy in
    period 1 no sales in future time periods
  • To generate future sales, prices will have to
    decline more rapidly and/or rate of technological
    obsolescence will have to increase in this
    case, consumers will trade off price vs.
    technological characteristics of product

14
Durable Products
  • Leasing more attractive for consumers because
    producers best positioned to determine future
    value of product
  • Rate of production per period of time
  • Rate of technological obsolescence
  • Economies of scale in maintenance
  • Producer should assume risk associated with
    uncertainty re. resale or terminal value can be
    influenced by production and technology decisions
    on producer

15
Durable Products
  • When price signal for quality, price will not
    decline
  • Mercedes example with warranty conditional on
    maintenance at authorized MB dealer
  • Higher price for maintenance
  • Reduced uncertainty re. credence product
    maintenance service
  • Higher re-sale value reinforces reputation
  • Longer expected life span
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)