Basis Sets - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Basis Sets

Description:

Accuracy: a case study. Some concluding thoughts. What is a basis set? ... Si: conduction band not converged various approaches (Jon's article on Wiki) ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:53
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 36
Provided by: nprb
Category:
Tags: basis | jons | sets

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Basis Sets


1
Basis Sets
  • Patrick Briddon

2
Contents
  • What is a basis set? Why do we need them?
  • Gaussian basis sets
  • Uncontracted
  • Contracted
  • Accuracy a case study
  • Some concluding thoughts

3
What is a basis set?
  • Solutions to the Schrödinger equation

are continuous functions, ?(x). ? not good for a
modern computer (discrete)
4
Why a basis set?
  • Idea
  • write the solution in terms of a series of
    functions
  • The function ? is then stored as a number of
    coefficients

5
A few questions
  • What shall I choose for the functions?
  • How many of them do I need?
  • How do I work out what the correct coefficients
    are?

6
Choosing Basis functions
  • Try to imagine what the true wavefunction will be
    like

V
?
7
Choosing Basis functions
?
Basis states
8
The coefficients
  • These are determined by using the variational
    principle of quantum mechanics.
  • If we have a trial wave-function
  • Choose the coefficients to minimise the energy.

9
How many basis functions?
  • The more the better (i.e. the more accurate).
  • Energy always greater than true energy, but
    approaches it from above.
  • The more you use, the slower the calculation!
  • In fact time depends on number-cubed!
  • The better they are, the fewer you need.

10
Basis sets ad LCAO/MO
  • There is a close relationship between chemistry
    ideas and basis sets.
  • Think about the H2 molecule

11
Basis sets and LCAO
  • Physicists call this LCAO (linear combination of
    atomic orbitals)
  • The basis functions are the atomic orbitals
  • Chemists call this molecular orbital theory
  • There is a big difference though
  • In LCAO/MO the number of basis functions is equal
    to the number of MOs.
  • There is no variational freedom.

12
What about our basis functions?
  • Atomic orbitals are fine, but they are
  • Not well defined you cant push a button on a
    calculator and get one!
  • Cumbersome to use on a computer
  • AIMPRO used Gaussian orbitals
  • It is called a Gaussian Orbital code.

13
Gaussian Orbitals
  • The idea
  • There are thus three ingredients
  • An exponent, a controls the width of the
    Gaussian.
  • A centre R controls the location
  • A coefficient varied to minimise the energy

14
The Exponents
  • Typically vary between 0.1 and 10
  • Si 0.12 up to 4
  • F 0.25 up to 10
  • These are harder to find than coefficients.
  • Small or large exponents are dangerous
  • Fixed in a typical AIMPRO run
  • determined for atom or reference solid.
  • i.e. vary exponents to get the lowest energy for
    bulk Si
  • Put into hgh-pots
  • then keep them fixed when we look at other defect
    systems.

15
The Positions/Coefficients
  • Positions we put functions on all atoms
  • In the past we put them on bond centres too
  • Abandoned what if a bond disappears during a
    run?
  • You cannot put two identical functions on the
    same atom the functions must all be different.
  • That is why small exponents are dangerous.
  • Coefficients AIMPRO does that for you!

16
How good are Gaussians?
  • Problems near the nucleus?
  • True AE wave function was a cusp
  • but the pseudo wave function does not!

17
How good are Gaussians?
  • Problems at large distance?
  • True wave function decays exponentially exp-br
  • Our function will decay more quickly exp-br2
  • Not ideal, but is not usually important for
    chemical bonding.
  • Could be important for VdW forces
  • But DFT doesnt get them right anyway
  • Only ever likely to be an issue for surfaces or
    molecules (our solution ghost orbitals)

18
AIMPRO basis set
  • We do not only use s-orbitals of course.
  • Modify Gaussians to form Cartesian Gaussian
    functions
  • Alongside the s orbital that will give 4
    independent functions for the exponent.

19
What about ds?
  • We continue, multiplying by 2 pre-factors

20
What about ds?
  • This introduces 6 further functions
  • i.e. giving 10 including the s and ps
  • Of these 6 functions, 5 are the d-orbitals
  • One is an additional s-type orbital

21
ddpp and all that
  • We often label basis sets as ddpp.
  • What does this mean?
  • 4 letters means 4 different exponents.
  • The first (smallest) has s/p/d functions (10)
  • The next also has s/p/d functions (10)
  • The last two (largest exponents) have s/p (4
    each)
  • Total of 28 functions

22
Can we do better?
  • Add more d-functions
  • dddd with 40 functions per atom
  • this can be important if states high in the
    conduction band are needed (EELS).
  • Clearly crucial for elements like Fe!
  • Add more exponents
  • ddppp
  • Pddppp
  • Put functions in extra places (bond centres)
  • Not recommended

23
How good is the energy?
  • We can get the energy of an atom to 1 meV when
    the basis fitted.
  • BUT larger errors encountered when transferring
    that basis set to a defect.
  • The energy is not well converged.
  • But energy differences can be converged.
  • So
  • ONLY SUBTRACT ENERGIES CALCULATED WITH THE SAME
    BASIS SET!

24
Other properties
  • Structure converges fastest with basis set
  • Energy differences converge next fastest
  • Conduction band converges more slowly
  • Vibrational frequencies also require care.
  • Important to be sure, the basis set you are using
    is good enough for the property that you are
    calculating!

25
Contracted basis sets
  • A way to reduce the number of functions whilst
    maintaining accuracy.
  • Combine all four s-functions together to create a
    single combination
  • The 0.1, 0.2, etc. are chosen to do the best for
    bulk Si.
  • They are then frozen kept the same for large
    runs.
  • Do the same for the p-orbitals.
  • This gives 4 contracted orbitals

26
The C4G basis
  • These 4 orbitals provide a very small basis set.
  • How much faster than ddpp?
  • Answer (28/7)3 or 343 times!
  • Sadly not good enough!
  • You will probably never hear this spoken of!
  • Chemistry equivalent STO-3G
  • Also regarded as rubbish!

27
The C44G basis
  • Next step up choose two different s/p
    combinations
  • We will now have 8 functions per atom.
  • (8/4)3 or 8 times slower than C4G!
  • (28/8)3 or 43 times faster than ddpp.
  • Sadly still not good enough!

28
The C44G basis
  • Main shortcoming change of shape of s/p
    functions when solid is formed.
  • Need d-type functions.
  • Add 5 of these.
  • Gives 13 functions
  • What we call C44G (again PRB speak)
  • Similar to chemists 6-31G

29
The C44G basis
  • 13 functions still (28/13)3 times faster than
    ddpp
  • Diamond generally very good
  • Si conduction band not converged various
    approaches (Jons article on Wiki)
  • Chemists use 6-31G for much routine work.

30
Results for Si (JPG)
31
The way forwards?
  • 13 functions still (28/13)3 times faster than
    ddpp
  • 4 functions was (28/4)3 times faster.
  • Idea at Nantes form combinations not just of
    functions on one atom.
  • Be very careful how you do this.
  • Accuracy can be as good as ddpp.

32
Plane Waves
  • Another common basis set is the set of plane
    waves recall the nearly free electron model.
  • We can form simple ideas about the band structure
    of solids by considering free electrons.
  • Plane waves are the equivalent to atomic
    orbitals for free electrons.

33
Gaussians vs Plane Waves
  • Number of Gaussians is very small
  • Gaussians 20/atom
  • Plane Waves 1000/atom
  • Well written Gaussian codes are therefore faster.
  • Plane waves are systematic no assumption as to
    true wave function
  • Assumptions are dangerous (they can be wrong!)
  • but they enable more work if they are faster

34
Gaussians vs Plane Waves
  • Plane waves can be increased until energy
    converges
  • In reality it is not possible for large systems.
  • Number of Gaussians cannot be increased
    indefinitely
  • Gaussians good when we have a single difficult
    atom
  • Carbon needs a lot of pane waves ? SLOW!
  • 1 C atom in 512 atom Si cell as slow as diamond
  • True for 2p elements (C, N, O, F) and 3d metals.
  • Gaussians codes are much faster for these.

35
In conclusion
  • Basis set is fundamental to what we do.
  • A quick look at the mysterious hgh-pots.
  • Uncontracted and contracted Gaussian bases.
  • Rate of convergence depends on property.
  • A good publication will demonstrate that results
    are converged with respect to basis.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com