Title: Structure of the Beef Cattle Industry
1Structure of the Beef Cattle Industry
- Industry is very segmented - numerous phases of
production - Industry is very diverse - almost infinite number
of environments, types of resources, etc
2Structure of the Beef Industry
- Cow-calf Operations - Purebred
- Producers of germ plasm -- genetic information
for the beef industry - Animals are recorded (or eligible) in breed
association registry have record of pedigree - Probably only 4 of cattle reproducing needs to
be PB
3Goals/Objectives/Challenges of the PB Producer
- Have a sense of seed stock needs of commercial
cattlemen - Develop a planned mating system
- Have long range goals
- Merchandise - be a salesperson
- Stay current
4Structure of the Beef Industry
- Cow-calf Operations Commercial
- Raise cattle of nondescript origin to produce
final product -
- 89 of operations have less than 100 head but
these account for only 52 of total cows - These operations are concentrated in areas of
abundant, inexpensive forage -- at most times of
the year cows nutrient requirement can be met by
forage alone - Warmer climate advantage?? Probably from a
forage standpoint - Majority of the operations are spring calving
-- make use of grass when cows have the greatest
need
5(No Transcript)
6(No Transcript)
7(No Transcript)
8(No Transcript)
9(No Transcript)
10(No Transcript)
11Structure of the Beef Industry
- Stocker Operations (yling, backgrounder, others)
- Weaned calves to graze grass, range, or any
available forage - most in warmer climates to place fall-weaned
calves through the winter -
- Consume high forage diet (lower energy), weaned
calf is physiologically ready to develop muscle
and skeleton - Need any form of abundant (cheap) mid quality
forage - corn stalks
- wheat pasture, hay field regrowth
- harvested forage concentrates in drylot
12(No Transcript)
13Non-feed costs often dictate what is needed for
economical gain
Goal keep cost-of gain low What if running on
corn stalks (low gain but low non-feed cost) if
get 1.2 lb/day gain for .12/day non-feed cost,
then non-feed cost of gain .10/lb of gain,
not bad! What if feeding in drylot for the same
gain if get 1.2 lb/day for .28/day non-feed
cost, then non-feed cost of is .23/lb, not
good What if you drylot and get 2.5 lb/day
gain non-feed cost is .11/lb, not bad
- Feed costs are associated with a cost per weight
gain (/lb) - ? Non-feed costs are usually associated with a
cost per - time (/day)
- ? Can not afford slow gain if non-feed costs are
high
What about compensatory gain??!!
14Structure of the Beef Industry
- Feedlot Operations
- Feed calves and yearlings a ration that is
moderately high to very high in energy -- rapid
growth and some fattening -
- More rapid gain with more expensive feeds than
the stocker operations -- higher nutrient
concentration - Where are feedlots located??
- Dry, moderate climate
- Near source of feed, especially grain
- near source of feeder cattle
- Population centers
- Others
15United States Feedyards gt 4,000 Head
January 1, 2002
16 17(No Transcript)
18(No Transcript)
19Midwest Slaughter vs. Feedlot Capacity
20(No Transcript)
21Types of Feedlots
- Farmer/feeder
- smaller - usually less than 2-3,000 head
- raise much of their own feed
- Commercial lot, one-time capacity more than 2,000
head - May own the cattle
- May custom feed
22Commercial Feedlots
23Farmer/Feeder Feedlots
24Structure of the Beef Industry
- Packer Operations
- Slaughter and carcass processing -- did not
process carcasses in the recent past - Eliminated some of the middle men
- No butchers at super markets
-
- Packing industry is now controlled by 3 major
companies (concern about packer concentration) - Tyson (was IBP)
- Swift and Company (was ConAgra)
- Excel (Cargil)
25United States Packers gt 200 Head
January 1, 2002
26(No Transcript)
27(No Transcript)
28(No Transcript)
29Vertical IntegrationRetained Ownership
- Weaning and selling calves at weaning greatly
simplifies planning for credit, labor, feeds,
market however, - Market flexibility is difficult in strict
cow-calf operations - When the market drops the producer is a price
taker - Retained ownership for a period post-weaning
increases the option, thus the market flexibility
30Advantages of Retained Ownership
- Potential for lowering the total cost of
production - Reap benefits of genetically superior animals
(growthy calves, carcass quality, breed
discrimination) builds track record on cattle - Growth potential for cattle is greatest at
weaning - Take advantage of your superior management
- Owning cattle longer provides more time to
utilize marketing and risk management chose
time to market allows for flexibility - Take advantage of seasonal market
31Disadvantages of Retained Ownership
- Finance and credit needs slower cash flow
- More feed and other costs
- Tax implications
- Understanding banker
- Need to be a more complete manager
- Knowledge of more phases of production
- Facilities
- Must have a market for heavier cattle
- Watch price spread between calves and yearlings
32Basis of Decision to Retained Ownership Watch
the price slide
- The greater the price slide the less likely
retained ownership is a good option - Example if weaned calves (500 lb) are worth
90/cwt, total value 450 - 700 lb yearlings _at_ 85 is worth 595, difference
is 145 or 72.50/cwt - 700 lb yearling _at_80/cwt is worth 560,
difference is 110 or 55/ cwt - 700 lb yearling _at_ 76/cwt is worth 532,
difference is 82 or 41/cwt
33What factors affect the price slide??
Read CL 816
34Price slide example
- Conditions of the sale selling weaned calves
with a base weight of 565 pounds for 90. The
buyer wants a 6.00/cwt price slide. The calves
are weaned and weigh 610 what is the selling
price? - 610 565 45 pounds over the base price
- 45 pounds x .06 slide per pound 2.70
(negative) - 90 2.7 87.30/cwt (only 24.03 more revenue
versus 40.50) - Some negotiated prices might include a grace
period or weight what if the slide did not take
effect until 10 pounds over the base?