Structure of the Beef Cattle Industry - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 34
About This Presentation
Title:

Structure of the Beef Cattle Industry

Description:

Packer Operations ... industry is now controlled by 3 major companies (concern about 'packer concentration' ... United States Packers 200 Head. January 1, 2002 ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:204
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 35
Provided by: carl47
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Structure of the Beef Cattle Industry


1
Structure of the Beef Cattle Industry
  • Industry is very segmented - numerous phases of
    production
  • Industry is very diverse - almost infinite number
    of environments, types of resources, etc

2
Structure of the Beef Industry
  • Cow-calf Operations - Purebred
  • Producers of germ plasm -- genetic information
    for the beef industry
  • Animals are recorded (or eligible) in breed
    association registry have record of pedigree
  • Probably only 4 of cattle reproducing needs to
    be PB

3
Goals/Objectives/Challenges of the PB Producer
  • Have a sense of seed stock needs of commercial
    cattlemen
  • Develop a planned mating system
  • Have long range goals
  • Merchandise - be a salesperson
  • Stay current

4
Structure of the Beef Industry
  • Cow-calf Operations Commercial
  • Raise cattle of nondescript origin to produce
    final product
  • 89 of operations have less than 100 head but
    these account for only 52 of total cows
  • These operations are concentrated in areas of
    abundant, inexpensive forage -- at most times of
    the year cows nutrient requirement can be met by
    forage alone
  • Warmer climate advantage?? Probably from a
    forage standpoint
  • Majority of the operations are spring calving
    -- make use of grass when cows have the greatest
    need

5
(No Transcript)
6
(No Transcript)
7
(No Transcript)
8
(No Transcript)
9
(No Transcript)
10
(No Transcript)
11
Structure of the Beef Industry
  • Stocker Operations (yling, backgrounder, others)
  • Weaned calves to graze grass, range, or any
    available forage
  • most in warmer climates to place fall-weaned
    calves through the winter
  • Consume high forage diet (lower energy), weaned
    calf is physiologically ready to develop muscle
    and skeleton
  • Need any form of abundant (cheap) mid quality
    forage
  • corn stalks
  • wheat pasture, hay field regrowth
  • harvested forage concentrates in drylot

12
(No Transcript)
13
Non-feed costs often dictate what is needed for
economical gain
Goal keep cost-of gain low What if running on
corn stalks (low gain but low non-feed cost) if
get 1.2 lb/day gain for .12/day non-feed cost,
then non-feed cost of gain .10/lb of gain,
not bad! What if feeding in drylot for the same
gain if get 1.2 lb/day for .28/day non-feed
cost, then non-feed cost of is .23/lb, not
good What if you drylot and get 2.5 lb/day
gain non-feed cost is .11/lb, not bad
  • Feed costs are associated with a cost per weight
    gain (/lb)
  • ? Non-feed costs are usually associated with a
    cost per
  • time (/day)
  • ? Can not afford slow gain if non-feed costs are
    high

What about compensatory gain??!!
14
Structure of the Beef Industry
  • Feedlot Operations
  • Feed calves and yearlings a ration that is
    moderately high to very high in energy -- rapid
    growth and some fattening
  • More rapid gain with more expensive feeds than
    the stocker operations -- higher nutrient
    concentration
  • Where are feedlots located??
  • Dry, moderate climate
  • Near source of feed, especially grain
  • near source of feeder cattle
  • Population centers
  • Others

15
United States Feedyards gt 4,000 Head
January 1, 2002
16

17
(No Transcript)
18
(No Transcript)
19
Midwest Slaughter vs. Feedlot Capacity
20
(No Transcript)
21
Types of Feedlots
  • Farmer/feeder
  • smaller - usually less than 2-3,000 head
  • raise much of their own feed
  • Commercial lot, one-time capacity more than 2,000
    head
  • May own the cattle
  • May custom feed

22
Commercial Feedlots
23
Farmer/Feeder Feedlots
24
Structure of the Beef Industry
  • Packer Operations
  • Slaughter and carcass processing -- did not
    process carcasses in the recent past
  • Eliminated some of the middle men
  • No butchers at super markets
  • Packing industry is now controlled by 3 major
    companies (concern about packer concentration)
  • Tyson (was IBP)
  • Swift and Company (was ConAgra)
  • Excel (Cargil)

25
United States Packers gt 200 Head
January 1, 2002
26
(No Transcript)
27
(No Transcript)
28
(No Transcript)
29
Vertical IntegrationRetained Ownership
  • Weaning and selling calves at weaning greatly
    simplifies planning for credit, labor, feeds,
    market however,
  • Market flexibility is difficult in strict
    cow-calf operations
  • When the market drops the producer is a price
    taker
  • Retained ownership for a period post-weaning
    increases the option, thus the market flexibility

30
Advantages of Retained Ownership
  • Potential for lowering the total cost of
    production
  • Reap benefits of genetically superior animals
    (growthy calves, carcass quality, breed
    discrimination) builds track record on cattle
  • Growth potential for cattle is greatest at
    weaning
  • Take advantage of your superior management
  • Owning cattle longer provides more time to
    utilize marketing and risk management chose
    time to market allows for flexibility
  • Take advantage of seasonal market

31
Disadvantages of Retained Ownership
  • Finance and credit needs slower cash flow
  • More feed and other costs
  • Tax implications
  • Understanding banker
  • Need to be a more complete manager
  • Knowledge of more phases of production
  • Facilities
  • Must have a market for heavier cattle
  • Watch price spread between calves and yearlings

32
Basis of Decision to Retained Ownership Watch
the price slide
  • The greater the price slide the less likely
    retained ownership is a good option
  • Example if weaned calves (500 lb) are worth
    90/cwt, total value 450
  • 700 lb yearlings _at_ 85 is worth 595, difference
    is 145 or 72.50/cwt
  • 700 lb yearling _at_80/cwt is worth 560,
    difference is 110 or 55/ cwt
  • 700 lb yearling _at_ 76/cwt is worth 532,
    difference is 82 or 41/cwt

33
What factors affect the price slide??

Read CL 816
34
Price slide example
  • Conditions of the sale selling weaned calves
    with a base weight of 565 pounds for 90. The
    buyer wants a 6.00/cwt price slide. The calves
    are weaned and weigh 610 what is the selling
    price?
  • 610 565 45 pounds over the base price
  • 45 pounds x .06 slide per pound 2.70
    (negative)
  • 90 2.7 87.30/cwt (only 24.03 more revenue
    versus 40.50)
  • Some negotiated prices might include a grace
    period or weight what if the slide did not take
    effect until 10 pounds over the base?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com