Evaluating a Moral Theory - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 12
About This Presentation
Title:

Evaluating a Moral Theory

Description:

Should Microsoft be punished for its competitive practices? ... Does inconsistency doom a moral theory? Justification. Defending the moral standard ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:40
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 13
Provided by: briank53
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Evaluating a Moral Theory


1
Evaluating a Moral Theory
  • Brian Burton
  • Western Washington University

2
A Question to Ponder
  • Should Microsoft be punished for its competitive
    practices?
  • Why or why not?What principles apply here?
  • What standards are you applying in judging
    Microsoft?

3
What Is a Moral Theory?
  • A systematic ordering of moral principles
  • A way of organizing thoughts about the right way
    to live
  • involves critical reflection
  • essential in the process of becoming a morally
    responsible person
  • essential in becoming consistently moral

4
The Three Levels of a Moral Theory
  • Moral judgments
  • moral evaluation of individuals or their actions
  • Moral principles
  • moral evaluation of types or classes of action
  • Moral standards
  • the criteria for judging what is morally right

5
Moral Judgments
  • A directive for action
  • Types of moral judgment
  • morally obligatory
  • morally impermissible
  • morally permissible
  • supererogatory
  • nontrivial and trivial
  • Examples

6
Moral Principles
  • The basis for moral judgments
  • Personal ethics
  • duties to self
  • duties to others
  • Social ethics
  • individual-group relationships
  • group-group relationships
  • Examples

7
Moral Standards
  • The most fundamental moral principle
  • a criterion for determining right and wrong
  • A characteristic all moral actions must share
  • Definitions of crucial terms
  • to clarify the concepts
  • Examples

8
Four Evaluation Criteria
  • Consistency
  • the formal criterion
  • Justification
  • the rational criterion
  • Plausibility
  • the common-sense criterion
  • Usefulness
  • the pragmatic criterion

9
Consistency
  • The question of logical compatibility
  • The question of incoherence
  • Does inconsistency doom a moral theory?

10
Justification
  • Defending the moral standard
  • Deductive proof impossible
  • How then do we justify our views?

11
Plausibility
  • Comparison with our own prior moral beliefs
  • The options if there is a conflict
  • The broader notion of common sense

12
Usefulness
  • Can the theory help us solve moral problems?
  • The difficulty in application
  • Resolving conflicting directives
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com