SUBRECIPIENT MONITORING - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 19
About This Presentation
Title:

SUBRECIPIENT MONITORING

Description:

The University of North Texas Health Science Center at Fort Worth. 2. Synopsis. Terminology ... A non-federal entity that expends federal awards received from a ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:96
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 20
Provided by: caseyj
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: SUBRECIPIENT MONITORING


1
SUBRECIPIENT MONITORING
  • LeAnn S. Forsberg
  • Director, Office of Grant and Contract Management
  • The University of North Texas Health Science
    Center at Fort Worth

2
Synopsis
  • Terminology
  • Pre-Award Issues
  • Negotiation / Standard Subcontracts
  • Monitoring
  • Close out

3
Subrecipient The A-133 Definition
  • A non-federal entity that expends federal awards
    received from a pass-through entity to carry out
    a Federal program..
  • Subrecipient or Vendor THAT IS THE QUESTION
  • Substance of the relationship is more important
    than the form of the agreement
  • Determination based on judgment of the particulars

4
Typical Attributes of Subrecipient
  • Prime determines who is eligible
  • Performance measured against objectives of
    Federal program
  • Responsibility for programmatic decision making
  • Responsibility for adherence to applicable
    federal program compliance requirements
  • Uses Federal funds to carry out program of
    organization as compared to providing goods or
    services

5
Consultants Are Not Subrecipients
  • Consultant ancillary to project independent
    expertise
  • Individual not organization
  • No employer/employee relationship
  • No salaries no overhead, fringe benefits

6
The Prime Relationship
  • Prime accountable to Sponsor
  • Subrecipient accountable to Prime
  • Secondtier sub accountable to Subrecipient,
    etc.

7
Subrecipient or Subcontract??
  • When the Prime Agreement is a Contract, the
    Subrecipient Agreement is a Subcontract
  • When the Prime Agreement is a Grant, the
    subrecipient is a technically a subgrant but
    is often referred to as a Subaward or a
    Subcontract

8
Governing Regulations Federal Contract
  • A-21 Cost Principles
  • Federal Acquisition Regulations (FARs) watch
    for agency specific FARs e.g. DFARS are Defense
    Department FARS
  • Regulations that govern the prime usually flow to
    subcontractor, except commercial to university,
    use different FARs

9
Governing Regulations Federal Grant
  • A 21 Cost Principles
  • A-110 Administrative Regulations for Colleges,
    Universities, Hospitals and other Nonprofit
    Organizations
  • Terms Conditions of Prime Grant usually flow to
    Subrecipient

10
Pre-Award Issues
  • Communicate with the PI
  • Decision to use subagreement
  • Preliminary information on external institution
  • Budget/budget justificationWhere a subrecipient
    fits and its impact on the budget
  • Start risk assessment

11
Pre-Award Issues
  • Communicate with external institutions
  • Confirm all contact information for external
    institutions PI, institutional official, and
    administrative liaison
  • Share all program guidelines, instructions, and
    formats

12
Pre-Award Issues
  • Minimum information needed from a subrecipient
  • Statement of work to be performed
  • Budget prepared using the budget format and level
    of detail required by the agency
  • Completed reps and certs (if required)
  • Signature of an authorized official signifying
    their intent to complete the project if funded

13
Negotiation / Standard Agreements
  • Which Subrecipient Agreement to use
  • Institutional Standard
  • National Subaward Model Agreement Form FDP
    Model
  • Communicate with PI to ensure there have been no
    changes since the proposal

14
Negotiation / Standard Agreements
  • Structure of Subaward Institutional Standard
  • Relevant institutional information
  • Scope of work
  • Reporting Requirements
  • Type of subaward
  • Reimbursement process

15
Negotiation / Standard Agreements
  • National Subaward Model Agreement Form FDP
    Model
  • http//www.thefdp.org/Subawards_Forms.html
  • FDP Versions and Non FDP versions with
    attachments for both

16
Monitoring
  • Prime Institution is required to determine
  • Subrecipient is eligible (not debarred)
  • Have appropriate financial systems to manage
    grants
  • No outstanding audit issues
  • Receive, review and pay invoices
  • Monitor technical progress
  • Audit or site visit if necessary

17
Monitoring
  • A-133 Compliance Supplement (Part 3, Section M)
  • Three factors that affect the extent of
    monitoring (the risk)
  • Program complexity
  • Percentage passed through
  • Amount of award

18
Monitoring
  • Based on the subrecipient risk
  • Reporting
  • Level of detail and review of financial and
    technical reports
  • Site Visits
  • On site review of financial and programmatic
    records and operations
  • Regular Contact
  • Audits

19
Close out
  • Required reports have been received and acted
    upon
  • Subrecipient has been paid (reviewed final
    invoice)
  • Invention Reports are completed
  • Property management review (as needed)
  • Desk Review or more if needed
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com