Title: National Chiefs Task Force on Consultation
1National Chiefs Task Force on Consultation
Accommodation
- Assembly of First Nations
2Role of AFN Supporting First Nations
- Communication of First Nations policy
perspectives - Promotion of greater awareness and respect of
First Nations rights and interests - Facilitating relationship building between the
Crown and First Nations - Advocating First Nations rights and interests
3Origins of the Duties
- Inherent Rights rights pre-existing to
colonization recognized in s.35 of the
Constitution Act - Treaties Aboriginal title rights identified
in treaties give rise to duties to consult
accommodate according to the given Treaty - Modern treaties or self-government agreements
also identify these duties - Common Law recognition standard in court
decisions, full enunciation of duties still
evolving
4Standards So Far
- Courts have set some standards
- Crowns fiduciary duty means First Nations
interests have priority over other interests - Duties to consult accommodate apply to resource
use as well as legislative policy development - Crown must discharge can not delegate duties
- Duties to consult accommodate are separate
- Consultation along a continuum from simple
notification to full consent based on the level
of infringement/impact and the nature of a First
Nations interests - Little direction yet on content of accommodation
duty - Objective is reconciliation of Crown sovereignty
with pre-existing Aboriginal title rights
5Critical factors in Consultation
- Both the federal and provincial Crowns have a
duty to consult - The Crown cannot delegate its fiduciary
obligation to consult to a third party - Consultation must genuinely attempt to address
First Nations concerns about the impact of an
action on their rights, and have no predetermined
outcome - Accommodation is the reconciliation of the
sovereignty of the Crown with pre-existing rights
of First Nations
6Nature of Duties
- Duties apply to any Crown action that may
infringe an Aboriginal right or interest - Duty is triggered at the earliest instance, where
there is potential or constructive knowledge of
impact on First Nations rights or title, either
established or asserted - First Nations also have a duty to engage in
consultation non-participation is interpreted
as declaration of non-interest
7Principle of First Nations Consent
- Principle reflected in First Nations law and
policy and is supported by the UN Declaration on
the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, which
recognizes that the free, prior, and informed
consent of First Nations is required - for development activities on First Nations
traditional lands - in the development of legislative or
administrative measures affecting First Nations - The UN Declaration recognizes that the right to
self-determination including the right to
consent and to withhold consent is held by each
First Nation - Currently, under Canadian Common Law, consent is
required in the instance of established rights
and where the infringement is determined to be
significant - determination of infringement impacts must be
made with First Nations cannot be done
unilaterally
8Resource Development
- 350 Billion in resource development in around
First Nations territories over the next 10 years - Title, rights interests will vary across the
country depending on the First Nation involved - Process for consultation will depend on
traditions structures of First Nation involved - Conflict results in delay, increased costs, lost
opportunity costs deepened impoverishment of
First Nations
9Legislative Policy Development
- Crown must consult First Nations on policies or
bills that may affect rights interests - Legal duty exists in addition to consultation as
a matter of good public policy - Unilateral Crown approach which may infringe
First Nations rights will be subject to
judicial scrutiny carrying the risk of a Crown
decision or activity being held to be void or
unenforceable - Such an approach is clearly counter-productive
resulting in delay, high costs to all involved,
ineffective policy development and ongoing
implementation issues
10First Nations Consultation Policies, Protocols
and Agreements
- A growing number of First Nations and PTOs have
developed, or are in the process of developing,
their own consultation protocols or policies - These often require
- Early engagement by the Crown or developers
respectful relationship building - First Nations involvement in process design
- Recognition of inherent and treaty rights, right
of self-determination - Respect of First Nations right to consent where
rights or interests may be negatively impacted - First Nations participation in decision-making
11First Nations Consultation Policies, Protocols
and Agreements
- First Nations with comprehensive self- government
agreements have negotiated legally-binding
consultation provisions with the Crown and these
agreements cannot be amended without the consent
of the First Nation concerned. - Some self-governing First Nations also have
negotiated separate consultation protocol
agreements with other governments. - Implementation remains a critical concern, and in
a number of cases treaties, protocols or
provisions are not upheld by representatives of
the Crown
12Emerging Issues
- The federal government has initiated a number of
programs and legislative changes that may signal
divergence from acceptable standards of
consultation and accommodation. - These are
- Major Projects Management Office
- Amendments to Navigable Waters Protections Act
- Canadian Environmental Assessment Act (CEAA).
13- Major Projects Management Office
- Streamline approvals for major resource projects
into two years. Shift consultation requirements
to project proponents. - Navigable Waters Protection Act Amendments
- Minister has complete discretion to list any
lake, river, stream as a minor waterway. No
Environmental assessment will be required for
projects on minor rivers. - No requirement for notice, consultation or
accommodation of First Nations interests or
impacts from projects. - There will be infringements to FN water
navigation rights.
14Proposed Changes to CEAA
- No environmental assessments for any project on
federal lands, where federally funded, or any
federal infrastructure project worth less than
10 million. - Exempt any project from federal environmental
assessment at the request of a provincial
government. - This could mean
- There will be a weakening of the duty to consult
resulting from the exemption of EAs, as EA is a
current tool recognized by the Courts as a
consultation mechanism. - First Nation rights will increasingly be
adjudicated under the realm of administrative law
(judicial review of government decisions), rather
than the higher level of constitutional law.
15National Chiefs Task Force (NCTF) on
Consultation and Accommodation
- Response to call for a unified and coordinated
First Nations approach to myriad efforts by
federal government regarding Consultation and
Accommodation - Intent to support First Nations governments in
the development of protocols, processes and
policies - Working with regional representatives to develop
First Nations minimum standards for Crown
behaviour
16National Chiefs Task Force (NCTF) activities to
date
- Two meetings of full Task Force January 28
March 16, 2009 and two regional fora (East/West)
took place March 2-3, 2009 - Represents the beginnings of the conversation
key preparatory work to develop coordinated FN
position - Canada is pushing short timelines for input to
policy approach AFN is attempting to secure
additional resources to continue work and
coordinate a unified FN response, as directed by
Task Force
17National Chiefs Task Force (NCTF) proposed next
steps
- AFN has developed proposal to INAC for support
to - Conduct in-depth analysis, including
- A review of jurisprudence and govt. responses
- A legal analysis of the Federal Interim
Guidelines - Synthesis of First Nation and indigenous
approaches to consultation and accommodation - Models and mechanisms for dispute resolution
- Using analysis and working with FN
representation, develop the initial framework for
a coordinated First Nation response, to contain
minimum standards and requirements for Crown and
industry behaviour - Convene a National Policy Forum to review and
discuss response - Seek endorsement of coordinated position by
Chiefs at the December 2009 Special Chiefs
Assembly