ISUP / SIP mapping - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

ISUP / SIP mapping

Description:

Schulzrinne_at_cs.columbia.edu. Raimo.Kantola_at_hut.fi. Camarillo ... Sudden changes in the path MTU trigger IP fragmentation. Problems with NATs and firewalls ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:113
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 21
Provided by: gonz50
Category:
Tags: isup | sip | edu | mapping | mtu

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: ISUP / SIP mapping


1
SIP over SCTP performance analysis
Gonzalo.Camarillo_at_ericsson.com Schulzrinne_at_cs.colu
mbia.edu Raimo.Kantola_at_hut.fi
2
Outline
  • Problem statement signalling transport
  • Introduction to SCTP
  • SCTP performance analysis
  • SCTP vs UDP
  • SCTP vs TCP

3
Signalling Transport (SIGTRAN)
  • Providers want to transport telephony signalling
    over IP
  • IP trunking
  • Let us try to use existing transport protocols

PSTN
IP
PSTN
SG
SG
SG Signalling Gateway
4
Traditional transports UDP and TCP
  • UDP (User Datagram Protocol)
  • Unreliable transfer of datagrams
  • Demultiplexing based on port numbers
  • Checksum
  • Example RTP
  • TCP (Transmission Control Protocol)
  • Reliable transfer of streams of bytes
  • Congestion control network friendly
  • Example HTTP, FTP, Telnet

5
TCP limitations
  • Carry every SS7 call on top of a TCP session
  • Every SS7 call is affected by the TCP three-way
    handshake
  • Multiple SS7 calls on top of a single TCP session
  • TCP provides a stream service Head of the line
    blocking problem

6
UDP limitations
  • Use UDP and application level retransmissions
  • No flow control Congestion
  • Large amount of state information in the
    application
  • In a slightly different context, this solution
    was adopted by SIP

7
Stream Control Transmission Protocol (SCTP)
  • SIGTRAN is chartered to develop a transport
    protocol that fulfils signalling transport
    requirements
  • October 2000 RFC 2960 Stream Control
    Transmission Protocol
  • A connection in SCTP terminology is an
    association
  • Four-way handshake (avoids DoS attacks)

SCTP
TCP
8
Stream Control Transmission Protocol (SCTP)
  • SCTP allows multihoming
  • A receiver can be reachable at multiple IP
    addresses
  • Robustness rather than load balancing
  • SCTP is a message-based protocol
  • Easier parsing
  • No need of application specific boundaries

9
Stream Control Transmission Protocol (SCTP)
  • SCTP allows multiple streams within an
    association
  • Flow control performed on association basis (TSN)
  • Delivery performed on stream basis (no head of
    the line blocking)

STREAM 0
TSNTransmission Sequence Number
10
Stream Control Transmission Protocol (SCTP)
  • SCTP uses TCP SACK congestion and flow control
    mechanisms (per association)
  • Slow start, congestion avoidance, fast
    retransmit, fast recovery
  • SCTP provides two services (per stream)
  • Ordered message delivery
  • Unordered message delivery
  • It also provides unordered messages within an
    ordered stream

11
SIP over SCTP
  • Two ways of transporting SIP over SCTP
  • Send all SIP requests and responses over a single
    unordered SCTP stream.
  • Send requests and responses belonging to the same
    SIP transaction over the same SCTP stream.
  • Stream ID can be used as a lightweight
    transaction identifier instead of the Call-ID,
    From, To, Via and Cseq header fields
  • Server side Incoming ACKs (non-2xx) and CANCELs
  • Client side Incoming responses

12
Simulations SCTP performance analysis
We implemented SCTP in the network simulator
(ns) We only analyzed the SIP hop-by-hop
handshake (INVITE-100 Trying)
15 ms
15 ms
15 ms
13
SCTP vs. UDP
Fast retransmit detects losses much faster than
UDP-based timeouts UDP lacks congestion control
Delay (ms)
Time a packet is generated (ms)
14
SCTP transport layer fragmentation
  • Every fragment a different TSN
  • Begin and End bits are used for reassembling
  • Once an SCTP packet is sent it cannot be
    re-fragmented again
  • Sudden changes in the path MTU trigger IP
    fragmentation
  • Problems with NATs and firewalls

SCTP DATA chunk
TSN 1 10
TSN 2 00
TSN 3 01
15
SCTP and TCP window-based congestion control
  • Congestion window (cwnd) limits the data rate at
    the sender
  • Slow start exponential growth of cwnd
  • Congestion avoidance linear growth of cwnd
  • When the data rate at the sender is limited by
    the application rather than by cwnd, the
    congestion window grows dramatically
  • Bursts of traffic produce heavy congestion

16
Head Of the Line (HOL) blocking
Comparison between ordered SCTP (which behaves
like TCP SACK) and unordered SCTP
Time a packet is received (ms)
Time a packet is generated (ms)
17
Measuring HOL buffer limited router
18
Measuring HOL induced packet loss
19
Measuring HOL competing traffic
20
Conclusions
  • UDP is not a suitable protocol for proxy to proxy
    communications
  • SCTP offers some advantages over TCP
  • Protection against DoS attacks
  • Multihoming
  • Message based
  • Lightweight transaction identifiers
  • HOL avoidance
  • Supposedly the biggest advantage of SCTP
  • Only significant gain when anyway the delay is
    unacceptable
  • SCTP has some limitations
  • Transport layer fragmentation
  • Window-based congestion control
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com