Title: Measurement, Scaling and Attitude Scales
1Chapter 9 10
- Measurement, Scaling and Attitude Scales
2Topics
- Concept of measurement and scaling
- Types scales primary scales
- Approaches to scaling
- comparative scaling techniques
- noncomparative techniques
- Validity and reliability
3Measurement and Scaling definitions
- Measurement
- Process of assigning numbers or labels to things
to represent quantities or qualities of
attributes according to some rule. - Rule
- A guide for making the assignment.
- Scaling
- Identification of the symbols or numbers to be
assigned by a rule to the individuals (or their
behaviors or attitudes) to whom the scale is
applied.
4Measurement and Scaling definitions (revised)
- Measurement
- the process of assigning categories (e.g.,
numbers) to concepts using some rule - Rule
- the method of assignment
- Scaling
- the creation of the categories (e.g., the
underlying continuum) used in measurement - Scale the continuum
5Concepts and Constructs
- Concept
- an abstract idea
- e.g., day, month, year
- Construct
- a higher level abstraction of an ideahigher
level concepts - e.g., time
6Types of Measurement Scales (1)
- Nominal Scales
- Scales that partition data into mutually
exclusive and collectively exhaustive categories. - Ordinal Scales
- Nominal scales that reflect order.
7Types of Measurement Scales (2)
- Interval Scales
- Ordinal scales with equal intervals between
points - may include an arbitrary zero point.
- Ratio Scales
- Interval scales with a meaningful zero point so
that magnitudes can be compared arithmetically.
8What Type of Scale?
9Can usually categorize scale as
- Discrete (categorical)
- nominal (classification) or
- ordinal
- Metric (continuous)--amount of something
- interval
- ratio
10Types of Scale Representations
- Graphic Rating Scales
- Graphic continua anchored by two extremes
- Itemized Rating Scales
- Scales in which the respondent selects an answer
from a limited number of ordered categories.
11Types of Attitude Scales (1)
- Comparative Scales
- require comparison of one object, concept, or
person against another. - Rank-Order Scales
- requires comparing one item with another or a
group of items against each other and ranking
them. - Pared Comparison
- require picking one of two objects in a set based
on some stated criteria.
12(No Transcript)
13(No Transcript)
14Types of Attitude Scales (2)
- Comparative scales (continued)
- Q-Sorting
- form or rank-ordering using card sorts and
assumed distributions . - Constant Sum Scales
- Attributes based on their relative importance to
the person
15Constant sum scale
16Types of Attitude Scales (3)
- Non-comparative scales
- scales requiring independent judgments
- Likert Scale
- requires specifying a level of agreement or
disagreement with statements about a referent - Semantic Differential Scale
- require rating in terms of a series of bipolar
adjectives
17Likert scale
Cal Poly is a great university for business majors
18T101 RIP 9.2 A Semantic Differential Scale for
Measuring Self Concepts, Person Concepts, and
Product Concepts
1. Rugged----------------------
------Delicate 2. Excitable--------
--------------------Calm 3.
Uncomfortable----------------------------C
omfortable 4. Dominating---------------
-------------Submissive 5.
Thrifty----------------------------Indulge
nt 6. Pleasant-------------------
---------Unpleasant 7. Contemporary--------
--------------------Noncontemporary 8.
Organized----------------------------U
norganized 9. Rational------------
----------------Emotional 10.
Youthful----------------------------Mature
11. Formal--------------------
--------Informal 12.
Orthodox----------------------------Libera
l 13. Complex---------------------
-------Simple 14. Colorless---------
-------------------Colorful 15.
Modest----------------------------Vain
19Types of Attitude Scales (4)
- Non-comparative scales (continued)
- Stapel scale
- An adaptation of semantic differential--requires
rating how close and in what direction an
adjective fits a concept
20Stapel Scale
5 4 3 2 1 Friendly -1 -2 -3 -4 -5
21True Score Model
- Xo Xt Xs Xr
- Xo Observed Score
- Xt True Score
- Xs Systematic Error
- Xr Random Error
22Types of Measurement Error
- Systematic Error
- Error that results in a constant bias in the
measurements. - Random Error
- Error that affects measurement in a transient,
inconsistent manner.
23Sources of Measurement Differences
- Accurate data implies accurate measurement, or M
A, where M refers to measurement and A stands
for complete accuracy. - Rarely found in market research
- Typically
- M A E
- where E errors
24Reliability Validity
- Reliability
- Degree to which measures are free from random
error and, therefore, provide consistent data - Validity
- Extent to which a measurement instrument actually
measures the attribute it was intended to measure
25Reliability Measures
- Test-retest give same test at different times to
same people - Alternative forms develop different but
equivalent forms--administer at different times - Internal consistency
- split-half physically divide
- Coefficient alpha average of all possible
split-half reliability coefficients
26Reliability Analysis (3)
27College Drinking DataParty Animal scale
28Reliability Analysis (2)
R E L I A B I L I T Y A N A L Y S I S - S
C A L E (A L P H A) Item-total Statistics
Scale Scale Corrected
Mean Variance Item-
Alpha if Item if
Item Total if Item
Deleted Deleted Correlation
Deleted ANIMAL 12.8333 24.5396
.5444 .6411 PARENTS 12.6882
26.8320 .2106 .7055 YOURSELF
12.7581 24.9952 .6169
.6402 NIGHTS 13.4194 23.0448
.6440 .6116 HOWMANY 10.4892
10.9864 .5806 .7276 REMEMBER
12.9194 22.8637 .5735
.6197 Reliability Coefficients N of Cases
186.0 N of Items 6 Alpha
.6924
29Reliability Analysis (3)
R E L I A B I L I T Y A N A L Y S I S - S
C A L E (A L P H A) Item-total Statistics
Scale Scale Corrected
Mean Variance Item-
Alpha if Item if Item
Total if Item
Deleted Deleted Correlation
Deleted ANIMAL 8.3011 7.8224
.4768 .6856 PARENTS 8.1559
8.8242 .1812 .7991 YOURSELF
8.2258 7.7325 .6540
.6367 NIGHTS 8.8871 6.6737
.6537 .6110 REMEMBER 8.3871
6.4980 .5818
.6408 Reliability Coefficients N of Cases
186.0 N of Items 5 Alpha
.7276
30Reliability Analysis (3)
R E L I A B I L I T Y A N A L Y S I S - S
C A L E (A L P H A) Item-total Statistics
Scale Scale Corrected
Mean Variance Item-
Alpha if Item if
Item Total if Item
Deleted Deleted Correlation
Deleted ANIMAL 5.9677 5.6963
.5502 .7773 YOURSELF 5.8925
5.8262 .6821 .7318 NIGHTS
6.5538 4.9620 .6558
.7262 REMEMBER 6.0538 4.6998
.6081 .7598 Reliability
Coefficients N of Cases 186.0
N of Items 4 Alpha .7991
31Validity
- degree too which the observed score measures
true score--i.e., true difference between objects
for characteristic being measured - therefore, reflects absence of total error (Xs
and Xr) - essential to generalizability
32Types of Validity
- Content (face) validity does measure appear to
measure what is intended - Criterion validity does measure behave as
expected in relation to other measures - Convergent Validity
- Divergent Validity
33Illustrations of Possible Reliability and
Validity Relationship
Situation 1
Situation 3
Situation 2
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Neither reliable nor Valid
Highly reliable but not valid
Highly reliable and valid
34(No Transcript)