Holes in the Work Support Fabric - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 19
About This Presentation
Title:

Holes in the Work Support Fabric

Description:

Steve Holt, holtsolutions_at_earthlink.net -- NAWRS 8/24/04. Holes in the Work Support Fabric ... Evidence of Low Multiple Program Participation in Wisconsin. Work ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:30
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 20
Provided by: Steve763
Category:
Tags: earthlink | fabric | holes | net | support | work | www

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Holes in the Work Support Fabric


1
Holes in the Work Support Fabric
  • Evidence of Low Multiple Program Participation in
    Wisconsin

2
Work Support Programs in WI
  • Wisconsin ( Federal) EITC
  • Wisconsin Shares (subsidized child care)
  • Medical Assistance, including BadgerCare
    (SCHIP)

3
Other WI Support Programs
  • Food Stamps
  • Homestead Credit (property tax circuit breaker)

4
Effect of Program Participation(Single Parent, 2
Children)
5
Q How fully are work support (and other income
support) programs utilized?
A No readily available answer
  • Why?
  • Information in multiple, unlinked data sets.

6
Some Answers from a Unique Matched Data Set
  • For 2000
  • All Wisconsin tax filers linked to
  • All Wisconsin public benefits recipients linked
    to
  • Unemployment insurance wage reports

7
Source of Data forProgram Participants
8
Number of Participating Households
9
Most Frequent Participation Patterns Overall
  • Homestead Credit only (147,903) if elderly,
    possibly Medicaid, too
  • Wisconsin EITC only (84,876)
  • Medicaid only (39,586) non-elderly, non-SSI
  • Food Stamps only (32,931)
  • Medicaid Food Stamps (25,859)
  • EITC Medicaid (23,221)
  • EITC Medicaid Food Stamps child care
    (19,789)
  • EITC Medicaid Food Stamps (19,032)

10
Multiple Program Participation Among an Eligible
Population
  • Single Parents with 2 Children
  • Annual Income
  • 7,000 - 13,000
  • (full participation 75 of necessities
    budget)
  • 13,000 - 18,000
  • (full participation 100 of necessities
    budget)

11
Percentage Participating(Single Parents, 2
Children)
12
Variance by number of children(Single Parents)
13
Variance by Marital Status(Single Parents, 2
Children)
14
If claiming subsidized child care(single
parents, 2 children, 7,000 - 18,000)
15
If claiming Medicaid(single parents, 2 children,
7,000 - 18,000)
16
If claiming Food Stamps(single parents, 2
children, 7,000 - 18,000)
17
If claiming Wisconsin EITC(single parents, 2
children, 7,000 - 18,000)
18
Steps in Progress -- Programmatic
  • Increased cross-agency cooperation
  • More aggressive identification of eligibility
    for multiple programs
  • Food Stamps changes
  • Transitional benefits, reduced change reported
  • PAR up from 56 in 2000 to 62 in 2003
  • Expanded categorical eligibility
  • Medicaid changes to increase participation
  • Milwaukee screening for public benefits
    eligibility among VITA tax filers
  • Homestead filing simplifications possible

19
Steps in Progress -- Research
  • Creation of duplicate matched data sets for
    2001 2002
  • Improve accuracy of findings
  • Assess trends
  • Employ longitudinal analysis
  • Departmental efforts to identify
    characteristics associated with
    non-participation
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com