How VCs Value Technology Companies - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 19
About This Presentation
Title:

How VCs Value Technology Companies

Description:

'Hard-to-do' technologies. Sound business models/'path to profitability: We invest ... (founders, family, friends, and foolhardy strangers) about $104B in 2002 ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:117
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 20
Provided by: dgr44
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: How VCs Value Technology Companies


1
How VCs Value Technology Companies
  • Bob Stearns
  • Sternhill Partners
  • February 20, 2004
  • Rice Alliance for Technology and Entrepreneurship

2
What We Look for
  • Management, management, management
  • Hard-to-do technologies
  • Sound business models/path to profitability We
    invest in businesses, not products
  • Large (and growing) potential markets
  • Intellectual property and other barriers to
    competitive entry
  • Liquidity opportunities

3
Venture Capital in Perspective
  • Equity Financing
  • 72 of start-up funding comes from informal
    sources (founders, family, friends, and foolhardy
    strangers) about 104B in 2002
  • Fewer than 2 of the fastest growing private
    companies (per Inc. magazine) are started with
    venture capital
  • Debt Financing
  • SBA loan guarantees only help 2-3 of all
    start-ups obtain debt

Sources of Equity Capital for Start-ups
Classical Venture Capital (28)
Classical Venture Capital is defined to consist
of seed, early, and expansion-stage financing.
Informal Sources (72)
Source Kauffman Center for Entrepreneurial
Leadership, Babson College, 2002.
4
Types of Funds by Stages
Source Venture Economics, July 2003
5
Valuation is More Art, Than Science
Valuations differ largely according to
investment stage
Early Stage
Late Stage
Determined mostly by subjective factors
Objective/quantitative factors more relevant
6
First, Some Definitions
  • Pre-money valuation is the dollar value of the
    idea (or company) at the time new money is
    invested
  • There is a new pre-money valuation at each new
    round of financing higher or lower than the
    post-money valuation of the last round

7
Example
Series A
3,000,000 pre-money valuation
2,000,000 equity invested 5,000,000 post-money
valuation
Therefore
Entrepreneurs own 60 (3M / 5M) Investors own
40 (2M / 5M)
This process repeats itself on each subsequent
round of financing
8
Early-stage Valuations
  • Traditional techniques cant be used because
    theres no
  • revenue or cash flow, so VCs must use subjective
    factors to
  • gauge value
  • Management Is leadership experienced and
    entrepreneurial?
  • Technology How unique is it? Are there IP
    (intellectual property) and other barriers to
    competitive entry?
  • Market What is the potential growth, size of
    the market?
  • Financial What is the total expected capital
    required?

9
Valuation Rule of Thumb for High Tech
  • In todays market, first-round valuations will
    start well below 10M, pre-money
  • Novice entrepreneurs are unlikely to get more
    than 5M in valuation
  • However and as always, for start-up/IPO veterans
    the skys the limit

10
Case StudyEarly-stage Deal I
  • Market large but unproven,
  • sales/marketing is a weakness
  • Financial greatest concern
  • is cash requirement
  • Management entrepreneurial,
  • engineering-oriented, will
  • require change in CEO to scale
  • Technology untested but
  • potentially disruptive

Solution Offer relatively low valuation, given
effort required to enhance management, prove
technology, and develop sales operation.
11
Case StudyEarly-stage Deal II
  • Management inexperienced
  • incubator
  • Technology solves real customer problems
  • Market emergent, but high potential
  • Financial has received large
  • offer from non-VC investor

Solution Because of inexperienced management,
this company receives a lower valuation than
previous case example even though its technology
and market appear stronger.
12
Case StudyEarly-stage Deal III
  • Financial company had
  • rejected earlier, cheaper offer
  • by VC, and had instead con-
  • ducted small insider round
  • Management just recruited
  • exceptional new team
  • Technology not breakthrough
  • technology but meets a need
  • Market attractive market

Solution This company receives significantly
higher valuation than either of the previous
cases because the management team enhances
attractiveness. Deal is considerably
over-subscribed.
13
Later-stage Valuations
  • Objective factors like discounted cash flows and
    comparables
  • are more relevant. VCs must also weigh progress
    of
  • company in achieving milestones
  • Management Is leadership able to scale
    business? Is complete team in place?
  • Technology Is technology being translated into a
    strong and extensible product?
  • Market Is there customer validation? What level
    of market penetration has been achieved?
  • Financial Is revenue being generated? When will
    it reach breakeven/become cash-flow
    neutral/positive?

14
Case StudyLater-stage Deal
  • Management experienced
  • in the industry, complete team
  • Technology fills real niche has just
    completed beta testing
  • Market just received initial order from a
    large lightship customer
  • Financial later-stage,
  • needs funds to take it to
  • IPO

Solution Strong market validation leads to
higher valuation and significant
over-subscription.
15
Other Factors
  • The basics of a company provide valuation
    guidance. Other factors help the VC determine a
    final number
  • Terms of the deal
  • Expected return
  • Value VC brings to the table
  • Industry expertise, contacts
  • Recruitment ability
  • Fundraising ability

16
Case StudyOther Factors
  • -- VC wants to ensure adequate return multiple
    for both upside downside
  • -- Early-stage company
  • -- Very large potential upside
  • -- Technology has some risk
  • -- Management wants as high a valuation as
    possible

Solution Modify terms of the deal incorporating
a 3x liquidation preference to protect the
downside while offering management a fair
valuation that could result in a 10x multiple.
17
Impact of VCs Required Returns
After assessing a companys current valuation and
expected liquidation value, the VC determines if
the potential return meets his funds
requirements
  • For the entire fund
  • 25-35 IRR over five years that means 3.5-4.0 x
    invested capital
  • That can produce triple-digit returns to limited
    partners (because of staggered timing of capital
    calls)
  • For each investment
  • For a 100M fund, need to make 10-15 (7-10M)
    investments (over multiple rounds)
  • 2-3 home runs (10x)
  • 2-3 triples (3-5x)
  • 2-3 doubles (1-2x)

18
Suggestions to the Entrepreneur
  • Find the best management you can!
  • Identify your competitive differentiation and
    value proposition (e.g., IP, management)
  • Know how much money youll need and why you need
    it
  • Know the VCs strengths and weaknesses, and what
    return the VC requires
  • Know the tricks of the trade (participation,
    anti-dilution, liquidation preferences, etc.) and
    be prepared to negotiate yourself (not through a
    third-party)
  • Dont price the deal Thats the VCs job!

19
The Bottom Line
  • What matters most is ensuring the
  • companys ultimate success Building
  • a strong company.
  • Valuation will
  • then take care of
  • itself.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com