Publication Patterns of Academic Health Sciences Librarians - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 19
About This Presentation
Title:

Publication Patterns of Academic Health Sciences Librarians

Description:

Librarians at LHL have non tenure-earning faculty appointments ... obituaries. proceedings of annual meetings. introductions to symposia. prefaces. oral histories ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:51
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 20
Provided by: LHL9
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Publication Patterns of Academic Health Sciences Librarians


1
Publication Patterns of Academic Health Sciences
Librarians
  • Patricia C. Higginbottom
  • Tracy E. Powell
  • Jack T. Smith, Jr.
  • Lister Hill Library of the Health Sciences
  • University of Alabama at Birmingham

2
Why the Interest?
  • Librarians at LHL have non tenure-earning faculty
    appointments
  • Achieve higher academic rank via the promotion
    process
  • Promotions committees include colleagues from
    outside the library
  • Many disciplines have standard expected for
    promotion

3
What Would We Like to Know?
  • Average publication rates for academic health
    sciences librarians
  • Author order-are there patterns and do they mean
    anything?
  • Publishing patterns by rank
  • Publishing patterns by institution

4
How Can We Find Out?
  • Review literature on what has been done
  • What do we need that hasnt been investigated?
  • Develop methodology to answer the specific
    questions we have
  • What is doable?
  • Gather the data and see what it tells us
  • Can we answer all of our questions?

5
What Answers are in the Literature?
  • Type of publication/where published
  • Type of librarian author
  • Type of article published
  • Number of articles published by an author
  • Factors influencing research and publication
  • Mularski, BMLA, 1991

6
Methodology
  • Identify potential pool of academic health
    sciences library (AHSL) authors
  • Identify AHSL authors of journal articles
  • Search for additional articles by those authors
  • Include enough time to get valid representation
  • Examine data by author and by institution

7
Methodology
  • Compare like items by excluding the following
  • letters to the editor
  • editorials
  • reviews of books, media, software
  • obituaries
  • proceedings of annual meetings
  • introductions to symposia
  • prefaces
  • oral histories
  • book chapters

8
What Did We Gather?
  • Potential author pool is AAHSL professional staff
  • Maximum of 160 institutions over 13-year period
  • Average of AAHSL potential authors in time
    period is 1449
  • Qualifying articles to develop published author
    pool
  • from TSQ, MRSQ, BMLA/JMLA

9
(No Transcript)
10
(No Transcript)
11
What Did We Gather?
  • Searched for journal articles by identified
    authors in other databases
  • Lib Lit, ISTA
  • Tallied number of articles and number of author
    instances
  • Compiled data by individual author and by
    institution

12
(No Transcript)
13
(No Transcript)
14
What Have We Found?
  • From 1990-2002, 536 AAHSL librarians appeared as
    author 1488 times, in 1092 articles, in the
    library literature
  • Most of the included articles had either 1 or 2
    authors
  • The average articles/ librarians for all
    AAHSL institutions was 0.44 for 1990-2002
  • The average articles/ librarians for
    published AAHSL institutions was 0.69 for
    1990-2002

15

Qualifying and ISTA articles
16
(No Transcript)
17
What Have We Found?
  • Most professional staff at AAHSL member
    institutions did not publish in the library
    literature from 1990-2002
  • An average of less than one article per
    professional position in the 13-year period is
    most common in AAHSL member institutions
  • 65 of AAHSL librarians who have published have 1
    or 2 articles in the time period

18
What Do We Have Left to Investigate?
  • We have not yet examined the MEDLINE and CINAHL
    data for relevant articles
  • We believe the number will be small and need to
    avoid skewing the data with false hits
  • We were not able to determine faculty rank for
    most authors
  • We have not determined if author position is
    relevant most articles had 1 or 2 authors

19
Questions?
  • Thank you
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com