Title: Presentation to
1- Presentation to
- Parliaments Portfolio Committee on Trade and
Industry - by
- Shan Ramburuth, Thulani Kunene and Tembinkosi
Bonakele - 28 March 2007
2Why competition policy?
- Fairness and access
- Prices and Quality
- Innovation
- Consumer Choice
3Competition Commissions activities
- Prosecution of anti-competitive behaviour
- Merger control
- Advocacy
4Commissions structure
COMMISSIONER
CORPORATE SERVICES
POLICY RESEARCH
MERGERS ACQUISITIONS
FINANCE
LEGAL SERVICES
ENFORCEMENT EXEMPTIONS
COMPLIANCE
HR
IT
REGISTRY
SECURITY FACILITIES
5Horizontal restrictive practices
A
C
B
- Agreement between competitors
- Rule of reason prohibition
- - substantial lessening or prevention of
competition - - technological, efficiency, pro-competitive
gains defences - Per se prohibitions
- - price fixing
- - division of markets
- - collusive tendering
6Vertical restrictive practices
- Agreement between a firm and its suppliers, its
customers or both - Rule of reason prohibition
- - substantial lessening or prevention of
competition - - technological, efficiency, pro-competitive
gains defences - Per se prohibitions
- - minimum resale price maintenance
- - may recommend a non-binding price
-
Supplier
Firm
Customer
7Dominant firms
- Threshold R5 million
- Market shares
- - 45 of market
- - between 35 and 45, unless it can show no
market power - - less than 35 with market power
- Market power
- -demand and supply substitutability
- -product and geographic markets
- -small but significant and non-transitory
increase in price
8Abuse of Dominance
- Excessive pricing to the detriment of consumers
- Refusal to give access to an essential facility
- Exclusionary conduct
- Requiring or inducing not to deal
- Refusing to supply scarce goods
- Tying
- Predatory pricing
- Buying up scarce supply of intermediate
goods/resources - Price discrimination
9Exemptions
- Maintenance or promotion of exports
- Promotion of SMEs business owned by HDIs to
become competitive - Stop decline in an industry
- Economic stability of a designated industry
- Intellectual property rights
- Professional rules
10Merger control
- Test
- Substantial lessening or preventing of
competition - Technological, efficiency and pro-competitive
justifications - Public interest grounds
- - Effect on particular industrial sector or
region - - Employment
- - SMEs or firms owned by HDIs to become
competitive - - Ability to compete in the international market
11Public Interest
- Consideration is given to the effects of the
merger on - A sector or region
- Employment
- Ability of SMEs or HDIs to become competitive
- Ability to compete internationally
12Case study Bread
-
- Initiation of complaint by Commissioner and
complaint from bread distributor - Against Blue Ribbon, Sasko, Duens and Albany
bakeries in Western Cape region - Evidence of price fixing/collusion
- Corporate leniency application
- Referral
- National investigation
- Milling
13Case study Milk
-
- Complaint initiated against Clover, Parmalat,
Ladismith Cheese, Woodlands Dairy, Lancewood,
Nestle and Milkwood Dairy - Price fixing of milk
- Manipulation of trading conditions
- Corporate leniency application
- Referral
-
14Case study Motor vehicles
-
- Complaint against Toyota
- Minimum resale price maintenance
- Commissioner initiated complaints against BMW,
General Motors, Daimler Chrysler, Nissan,
Volkswagen, Citroen - Discounting policies
- Smoking gun evidence
- Penalties totaling R51 million in settlement
-
15Case Study TAC Ms Hazel Tau
- Complaint against GlaxoSmithKline Boehringer
Ingelheim - Excessive pricing, refusing competitor access to
an essential facility, exclusionary conduct - Impeded generic manufacturers from entering ARVs
market - Settlement agreements
- Agreement to issue patented licences of ARVs to
generic manufacturers - Prices of ARVs fell dramatically
-
-
16The banking inquiry
- Concern relating to allegations of high bank
charges - National Treasurys research
- Competition Commissions research
- Market transparency
- Voluntary submissions
- Public hearings
- Recommendations on
17Compliance
- Dedicated division to
- Promote voluntary compliance
- Promote culture of competition
- Through
- Education and Advocacy
- Communication
- Stakeholder Relations
18Education
- Stakeholders Trade unions, consumer forums,
SMMEs, business - Advisory opinions, clarifications
- Corporate compliance programmes
- Workshops and presentations
-
-
19Advocacy
- Government, Regulators, Parliament, organised
business, professional associations - Policy, legislation, regulations, administrative
decisions, professional rules, business practices
must be consistent with sound competition
principles - Examples
- - Pension Funds Adjudicators ruling on switching
retirement annuity funds - FAIS ombuds referral Changes to the Short Term
Insurance Act - untying insurance and bond - Mobile number portability
20Communication
- Inform members of the public about what we do
- Create awareness of competition issues
- Every member of society a consumer
- Print and electronic media
- Publications
-
21Stakeholder relations
- Addressing concurrent jurisdiction issues
- - Forum Shopping
- MOUs - ICASA, NER, Postal Services Regulator,
negotiating with the SARB, FSB, NLA, DME - South African Regulators Forum