Case Study - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 10
About This Presentation
Title:

Case Study

Description:

Current capital structure vs. target capital structure ... for Calculating the Cost of Capital. Estimating the costs for many sources of capital is not very ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:1102
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 11
Provided by: theunivers50
Category:
Tags: capital | case | cost | current | of | study

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Case Study


1
Case Study 6
  • Marriott Corporations The Cost of Capital
  • Ning Gong

2
Objectives of the Case Study
  • Calculating the WACC under the classical tax
    system for the company as a whole and for each
    division of the company
  • Current capital structure vs. target capital
    structure
  • How to use a peer group to estimate divisional
    equity beta
  • This technique is useful for estimating
    privately-held companies

3
Company Background
  • Marriott had three major lines of business, based
    on 1987 number

4
Uses of the Hurdle Rate
  • Investment projects were selected by discounting
    the cash flows by the appropriate hurdle rate for
    each division
  • The executive compensation plan would reflect
    hurdle rates, making managers more sensitive to
    Marriotts performance and capital market
    conditions
  • EVA in essence

5
Cost of Debt for Marriott Corporation
  • We use the after tax WACC under the classical tax
    system for Marriott Corporation
  • The target debt ratio is 60, and the debt costs
    1.30 8.72 10.02 (See Tables AB)
  • We will ignore the difference between floating
    rate vs. fixed coupon rate debts here
  • The floating rate debt will be studied in
    Investments elective

6
The Cost of Equity for Marriott Corp.
  • The cost of equity is based on the CAPM
  • The risk free rate was 8.72.
  • Note there is a debate whether we should use
    long-term or short-term government bond rate as
    the risk-free benchmark. However, it is typical
    to use the 10-year rate in the corporate setting,
    as practiced by McKinsey other consulting
    firms.
  • The equity risk premium was 7.43.
  • However, based on the most recent data, it should
    be around 6.5.
  • There are some ambiguities about the magnitude of
    the equity risk premium.

7
The Cost of Equity (continued)
  • The historical equity beta was 1.11 (see Exhibit
    3)
  • Can we use this beta directly?
  • If the target and the historical debt ratios are
    similar, we could. Otherwise, we have to adjust
    the beta.
  • The beta was estimated as 1.11 at the time when
    the debt/total capital ratio was 0.497 (based on
    the average between 83-87). However, the target
    debt ratio was 60, see Table A.
  • The adjustment can be done by first finding the
    un-levered beta for Marriott, and then adjust for
    the target debt capital ratio. In doing so, we
    need to assume that the beta of debt is zero, or
    you could find the beta of debt by regression.

8
Cost of Equity for Marriott as a Whole
  • The formula
  • The beta of debt is typically small. Without any
    further information, lets assume it is zero.
    Thus, the assets beta is 0.5031.110.558
  • After adjusting for the target debt ratio, the
    beta of equity for Marriott should be 0.558/0.4
    1.396

9
WACC for Marriott as a Whole
  • Choosing t 44, the effective tax rate from
    1983-88 based on Exhibit 1,
  • However, using a single hurdle rate imposes a
    systematic bias on project selection. Risky
    projects appear more profitable, and less risky
    projects appear less profitable.
  • For the calculation of the WACC for lodging
    division, see the spreadsheet.

10
Some Practical Considerations for Calculating the
Cost of Capital
  • Estimating the costs for many sources of capital
    is not very precise. In practice, we often make
    simplifying assumptions.
  • Non-interest-bearing liabilities, such as
    accounts payable, are excluded from calculation
    of WACC to avoid inconsistencies and simplify the
    valuation.
  • There are other long-term liabilities (such as
    pension funds liabilities), which are often too
    complicated to infer the required rate of return.
    There is no definitive answer to the question.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com