Title: The Distribution of Income
1Chapter 20
- The Distribution of Income
2The Distribution of Income
- A persons earnings depend on
- -SD for persons labor
- - natural ability,
- -human capital,
- -compensating differentials, discrimination
3The Measurement of Inequality
- How much inequality is there in our society?
- How many people live in poverty?
- What problems arise in measuring the amount of
inequality? - How often do people move among income classes?
All Big Questions!
4U.S. Income Inequality
- Imagine. . .
- Line up all families according to their income.
- Divide families into five equal groups
- Compute share of each groups share to total
income
5U.S. Income Inequality
- If income equally distributed across l
families, each one-fifth of families gets 20
percent of total income.
6Percentage of Income By Quintiles
- Quintile 1935 1970 1994
- Poorest 4.1 5.5 4.2
- 2nd Poor 9.2 12.2 10.0
- Middle 14.1 17.6 15.7
- 2nd Rich 20.9 23.8 23.3
- Richest 51.7 40.9 46.9
- Top 5 26.5 15.6 20.1
7Historic Trends in Income Inequality
- From 1935-1970, income distribution became more
equal. - Trend reversed recently
8Reasons for Increased Inequality
- Increases in international trade with low-wage
countries - Technology has reduced demand for unskilled labor
- Wages of unskilled workers have fallen relatively
9Income Inequality and Poverty
- The Poverty Rate is of population whose family
income falls below poverty line.
Below the Line!
10Income Inequality and Poverty
- Poverty does not affect all groups with equal
frequency. - The Poverty Rate is of population whose
family income falls below the poverty line.
11Insights to Poverty
- Three facts about poverty It is correlated with
- Race.
- Age
- Family Compositon
12Poverty Rate By Demographic Group
- Group Poverty Rate
- All Persons 14.5
- White 11.7
- Black 30.6
- Hispanic 30.7
- Female house 38.6
- Children (lt18) 21.8
- Elderly (gt64) 11.7
13International Comparison of Inequality
- Country Bottom Fifth Top Fifth
- Japan 8.7 37.5
- China 6.4 41.8
- U.S. 4.7 41.9
- U.K. 4.6 44.3
- Mexico 4.1 55.9
- Brazil 2.1 67.5
14The Poverty Line and Income Inequality
- Poverty Line set by federal govt at three times
cost of an adequate diet. - With economic growth, more families pushed above
poverty line
15The Poverty Line and Income Inequality
- Poverty Line is set by the federal government at
roughly three times the cost of providing an
adequate diet.
16Problems in Measuring Inequality
- Data give incomplete picture of inequality
because of - In-Kind Transfers
- The Economic Life-Cycle
- Transitory versus Permanent Income
17In-Kind Transfers
- Income distribution poverty rate are based on
money income. - In-Kind Transfers given to the poor in form of
goods services (food stamps, health care) - Failure to include these raises measured poverty
rate.
18The Economic Life-Cycle
- Regular pattern of income variation over
life-time called the life cycle - Low income at beginning of career
- Income rises as worker gains experience
- Income peaks around age 50
- Income falls sharply at retirement
19Transitory versus Permanent Income
- Because of random forces, incomes vary
- Acts of nature reduce income
- Temporary layoff due to illness or economy
- Familys ability to buy goods services depends
on permanent income which excludes transitory
changes
20Time Series Consumption Function
Consumption
C .9 Y
Income
21Cross -Section Consumption Function
Consumption
C 1000 .7 Y
Income
22Why Two Consumption Functions?
- Time Series Data yield a function that is steep
with no intercept - Cross Series Data yield a function with a flat
slope and a positive intercept
23Friedmans Permanent Income Hypothesis
Consumption
C a Yp
C b c Ym
Income
Yml LOW HIGH
Ypl
Yph
Ymh
24Income Inequality andEconomic Mobility
- Substantial economic mobility in the US --
movement among income quintiles - Sources of Economic Mobility
- Luck
- Hard Work
- Persistence of economic success from generation
to generation (e.g. father/son)
25Quick Quiz!
- What does the poverty rate measure?
- Describe three potential problems in interpreting
the measured poverty rate.
26Political Philosophy of Redistributing Income
- What should the government do about economic
inequality? - Economic theory does not have a simple, clear
response. - Three Political Philosophies
- Utilitarianism
- Liberalism
- Libertarianism
27Liberalism (John Rawls)
- Income to be redistributed so poorest would
receive an adequate income. - Development of public policy so as to maximize
the minimum utility. - Based on maximin criterion
- A form of social insurance
28Liberalism (John Rawls)
- Income redistributed so poorest receive an
adequate amount. - Development of public policy so as to maximize
the minimum utility.
29Utilitarianism
- Based on assumption of diminishing marginal
utility... - ... an extra dollar of income to a poor person
provides that person with more additional utility
than does an extra dollar to a rich person. - Utilitarian goal is to have government
redistribute income such that the sum of
everyone's utility is maximized.
30Libertarianism (Robert Nozick)
- ...society itself earns no income--only
individual members... - Government should enforce individual rights and
let market determine final distribution of income
- Equality of opportunities, not equality of
incomes.
31Quick Quiz!
- Pam earns more than Pauline. Someone proposes
taxing Pam in order to supplement Paulines
income. - How would a utilitarian, a liberal, and a
libertarian evaluate this proposal?
32Policies to Reduce Poverty
- Policies to redistribute income and reduce
poverty - Minimum Wage Laws
- Welfare
- A Negative Income Tax
- In-Kind Transfers
33Minimum Wage Laws
- Minimum wage benefits some poor but hurts others
- Magnitude of its effects depend on labors demand
elasticity - Many minimum wage earners are teenagers from
middle class families
34Welfare
- The government attempts to raise the standard of
living through the welfare system. - Welfare encompasses various government programs,
two of which include - Aid to Families with Dependent Children
- Supplemental Security Income
35A Negative Income Tax
- A program advocated to supplement the income of
the poor. - High-income families would pay a tax based on
their incomes. Low-income families would receive
a subsidy -- a negative tax. - Poor families would receive financial assistance
without having to demonstrate need.
36Work Earnings
- Labor Hours Wage Earnings
- 0 5 0
- 500 5 2,500
- 1000 5 5,000
- 1500 5 7,500
- 2000 5 10,000
- 2500 5 12,500
37A Welfare Program
- Labor Earnings Benefit Income
- 0 0 7,500 7,500
- 500 2,500 5,000 7,500
- 1000 5,000 2,500 7,500
- 1500 7,500 0 7,500
- 2000 10,000 0 10,000
- 2500 12,500 0 12,500
38A Welfare Program
- Labor Earnings Benefit Income
- 0 0 7,500 7,500
- 500 2,500 5,000 7,500
- 1000 5,000 2,500 7,500
- 1500 7,500 0 7,500
- 2000 10,000 0 10,000
- 2500 12,500 0 12,500
39A Negative Income Tax
- Labor Earnings Benefit Income
- 0 0 7,500 7,500
- 500 2,500 6,000 8,500
- 1000 5,000 4,500 9,500
- 1500 7,500 3,000 10,500
- 2000 10,000 1,500 11,500
- 2500 12,500 0 12,500
40A Negative Income Tax
- Labor Earnings Benefit Income
- 0 0 7,500 7,500
- 500 2,500 6,000 8,500
- 1000 5,000 4,500 9,500
- 1500 7,500 3,000 10,500
- 2000 10,000 1,500 11,500
- 2500 12,500 0 12,500
41A Negative Income Tax
- Income Tax ( .60 Earnings - 7,500)
- Earnings Tax Income After Tax
- 0 -7,500 7,500
- 10,000 -1,500 11,500
- 20,000 4,500 15,500
- 30,000 10,500 19,500
- 40,000 16,500 23,500
- 50,000 22,500 27,500
42In-Kind Transfers
- Direct provision of goods services to raise
living standards. - Examples of In-Kind Transfers
- Food
- Shelter
- Toys at Christmas
- Food Stamps
- Medicaid
Good Bye!
43Anti-Poverty Programs and Work Incentives
- Many programs attempt to reduce poverty incidence
and help the truly needy, but perverse effects
exist. - Example
- Family needs 15,000 to maintain a reasonable
standard of living. The government promises to
guarantee every family up to the 15,000. - Incentive to earn more is reduced due to the
effective marginal tax rate of 100.
44Quick Quiz!
- List three policies aimed at helping the poor,
and discuss the pros and cons of each.