Wachusett Reservoir Watershed Land Management Plan - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 21
About This Presentation
Title:

Wachusett Reservoir Watershed Land Management Plan

Description:

... areas and sensitive habitat (vernal pools, seeps, springs, orchards, ... Plan recognizes need for vernal pool certification of over 300 potential pools ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:80
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 22
Provided by: jer1152
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Wachusett Reservoir Watershed Land Management Plan


1
Wachusett Reservoir Watershed Land Management
Plan Metropolitan District Commission
(MDC)/Division of Watershed Management
(DWM) Ecosystem Management?
Jeremy M. Lewis Mark Richardson Lauren
Tuori Orione Bean Robert C. Tulloch
2
Framework
  • Wachusett Reservoir background
  • Plan overview
  • Ecosystem management evaluation criteria
  • Rating of plan
  • Concluding remarks

3
(No Transcript)
4
(No Transcript)
5
Wachusett Reservoir Watershed
  • 26 owned by MDC/DWM
  • 37 of watershed is privately owned
  • 75 of watershed is forest or wetland
  • 10 of watershed is residential
  • 284 persons/mi2 compared to 16 persons/mi2 on the
    Quabbin watershed
  • Overall, only 52 of watershed is protected

6
MGL Chapter 372 Legislative Mandate
  • Est. the DWM and directed it to utilize and
    conservewater and other natural resources in
    order to protect, preserve, and enhance the
    environment of the Commonwealth and to assure the
    availability of pure water for future generations
  • Directs MDC/DWM to periodically prepare watershed
    mgt. plans for forestry, water yield
    enhancement and recreational activities.

7
Broad overarching mandate Maintain high quality
source water for present and future generations.
(Sustainable mgt.)
Management Goals
Management Actions
Land acquisition, public education
Land Protection
Maintain high proportion of forested conditions
Reduce/Control nutrient and pollutant inputs
Provide healthy, diverse, vigorous uneven-aged
forest strucutre and adequate regeneration
Uneven-aged Silvicultural Methods
8
Goals (cont)
Actions (cont)
Protection and maintenance of wetlands, cultural
resources, and fields
Maintain certain amount of non-forested habitat
Management restrictions in areas identified as
important to rare species and/or habitats
Protection of rare species and habitats
Continuing assessment and identification of
important cultural resources and appropriate
protection
Cultural Resource Protection
9
Water quality monitoring system in place, CFI,
develop system for monitoring other issues
Monitor water quality, forest conditions, biota,
HWA, invasive species
Continued field work and detailed mapping using
GPS
Improve Upon GIS database
Technical assistance, Annual Wachusett public
meeting
Public involvement and education
Annual revisions based on technical, scientific,
and public input
Annual Revisions (Adaptive)
10
9 Ecosystem Management Criteria
  • Societal Values
  • Interstakeholder cooperation
  • Organizational Change
  • Human embedded in nature
  • Ecological Boundaries
  • Hierarchal context
  • Ecological Integrity
  • Data Collection Monitoring
  • Adaptive Management

11
Societal Values
  • MGL chapter 372 legislation directed by society
  • plan acknowledges that the values of different
    stakeholder groups might conflict
  • historical and cultural values, such as
    preserving the Old Stone Church, are emphasized
  • ecological values, especially preservation of
    biodiversity and native species, are stressed
  • economic values of land, especially through
    timber harvesting, are a key component of the
    management plan
  • recreational values noted as possibly conflicting
    with ecological concerns
  • BUT, all of these values are secondary to the
    value of ensuring water quality

OVERALL RATING 9 out of 10
12
Interstakeholder Cooperation
  • 1995 agreement with USDA Forest Service to
    provide technical assistance to private
    landowners
  • 1998 agreement with DEM, to manage adjacent lands
    together
  • coordinates with Massachusetts Water Resource
    Agency responsible for water transmission and
    treatment
  • plans to coordinate with Mass Wildlifes
    Endangered Species and Natural Heritage Program
    to inventory rare species and communities
  • most emphasis on interaction with private
    landowners and the public than with other
    governmental agencies
  • BUT, primary goal is to acquire and own watershed
    lands and to have direct control over it

OVERALL RATING 5 out of 10
13
Organizational Change
  • No major institutional changes were undertaken as
    a result of management plan
  • Changes in project implementation, such as timber
    sales, law enforcement, and wildlife management
  • No indication as to receptiveness for future
    organizational change
  • Note Romney administration proposes merging the
    MDC with the DEM and forming a new Division of
    Conservation and Recreation. Unsure of the
    impacts on plan implementation, but funding cuts
    are inevitable.

Overall Rating 7 out of 10
14
Humans Embedded in Nature
  • Plan acknowledges that ALL human activities on
    the land have direct impacts on the watershed
    ecosystem
  • Goal is to discourage land uses that degrade
    water quality
  • Major anthropogenic disturbance is timber
    harvesting
  • No measurable impact on water quality required
    of all forest management activities
  • Public education programs encourage private
    landowners and recreational users to be good
    stewards of the land

Overall Rating 9 out of 10
15
Ecological Boundaries
  • Watershed Boundaries clearly defined, but major
    challenge is managing across political boundaries
    within watershed
  • Plan recognizes need to work across boundaries to
    achieve goals and objectives of watershed
    protection
  • Plan encourages private landowners to be proper
    stewards of the land and to consider designing
    strategic management plans that considers
    surrounding ecosystem
  • Encourages Massachusetts Forest Stewardship
    program
  • Cooperative agreements with other land protection
    entities
  • Land acquisition program

Overall Rating 9 out of 10
16
Hierarchical Context
  • Plan does address need to manage beyond
    individual parcel level (i.e. public outreach,
    land acquisition program)
  • Systems Perspective addressed
  • Ecosystem managed for primary purpose of ensuring
    water quality, and other benefits are secondary
    and associated with forest habitat
  • Most active management is focused on providing
    habitat or conditions for rare and endangered
    species, in areas that do not affect water
    quality. -MDC/DWM

Overall Rating 6 out of 10
17
Ecological Integrity
  • Manage for native diversity, favor species best
    suited for particular sites
  • Plan identifies the need to preserve critical
    areas and sensitive habitat (vernal pools, seeps,
    springs, orchards, buffer zones etc.)
  • Control or eradicate invasive/non-native species
  • Promote uneven-aged forest to reduce impacts from
    natural disturbance rather than emulate it
  • Not concerned with increasing habitat diversity,
    primary concern is maintaining forested condition
  • Only concerned with maintaining existing open
    space, rather than increasing its proportion
  • No plans to reintroduce extirpated native species
  • The MDC recognizes that its greatest contribution
    to regional biodiversity is protecting large
    areas of land from development and maintaining
    most of those lands in forest cover.

Overall Rating 7 out of 10
18
Data Collection Monitoring
  • Established water quality and forest conditions
    monitoring system in place
  • Limited wildlife research conducted, plan
    recognizes need for increased research on
    endangered and high priority species
  • Plan recognizes need for vernal pool
    certification of over 300 potential pools
  • Using Quabbin format for cultural resource
    inventory
  • Extensive use of GIS database for management
  • Most improvements dependant on funding and
    personnel

Overall Score 7 out of 10
19
Adaptive Management
  • Annual revisions are done based on scientific,
    technical, acquired lands, and public input (i.e.
    Annual Wachusett Public meeting)
  • All of the mgt. actions are easily applicable to
    newly acquired lands
  • This plan should be viewed as an adaptive
    watershed management plan to be applied but
    updated and modified as new properties are added
    and new information comes to light.
  • -MDC/DWM

Overall Rating 9 out 10
20
Key Points of Interest
  • Positive Attributes
  • Highly adaptable plan
  • Effort to work with private landowners
  • Addresses stakeholder values
  • Negative Attributes
  • Limited inventory of cultural and wildlife
    resources
  • Inadequate interagency cooperation
  • Lacks dynamic view of ecological processes

21
Concluding Remarks
  • Overall rating of 75, based on our criteria
  • Overall, the plan addresses most of the ecosystem
    management criteria required to be considered an
    Ecosystem Management Plan
  • The issue is with constraints primary attention
    to water quality, funding, personnel, private
    landowner cooperation
  • Once these issues are addressed, the area will be
    properly managed as an ecosystem
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com