Title: Wachusett Reservoir Watershed Land Management Plan
1Wachusett Reservoir Watershed Land Management
Plan Metropolitan District Commission
(MDC)/Division of Watershed Management
(DWM) Ecosystem Management?
Jeremy M. Lewis Mark Richardson Lauren
Tuori Orione Bean Robert C. Tulloch
2Framework
- Wachusett Reservoir background
- Plan overview
- Ecosystem management evaluation criteria
- Rating of plan
- Concluding remarks
3(No Transcript)
4(No Transcript)
5Wachusett Reservoir Watershed
- 26 owned by MDC/DWM
- 37 of watershed is privately owned
- 75 of watershed is forest or wetland
- 10 of watershed is residential
- 284 persons/mi2 compared to 16 persons/mi2 on the
Quabbin watershed - Overall, only 52 of watershed is protected
6MGL Chapter 372 Legislative Mandate
- Est. the DWM and directed it to utilize and
conservewater and other natural resources in
order to protect, preserve, and enhance the
environment of the Commonwealth and to assure the
availability of pure water for future generations - Directs MDC/DWM to periodically prepare watershed
mgt. plans for forestry, water yield
enhancement and recreational activities.
7Broad overarching mandate Maintain high quality
source water for present and future generations.
(Sustainable mgt.)
Management Goals
Management Actions
Land acquisition, public education
Land Protection
Maintain high proportion of forested conditions
Reduce/Control nutrient and pollutant inputs
Provide healthy, diverse, vigorous uneven-aged
forest strucutre and adequate regeneration
Uneven-aged Silvicultural Methods
8Goals (cont)
Actions (cont)
Protection and maintenance of wetlands, cultural
resources, and fields
Maintain certain amount of non-forested habitat
Management restrictions in areas identified as
important to rare species and/or habitats
Protection of rare species and habitats
Continuing assessment and identification of
important cultural resources and appropriate
protection
Cultural Resource Protection
9Water quality monitoring system in place, CFI,
develop system for monitoring other issues
Monitor water quality, forest conditions, biota,
HWA, invasive species
Continued field work and detailed mapping using
GPS
Improve Upon GIS database
Technical assistance, Annual Wachusett public
meeting
Public involvement and education
Annual revisions based on technical, scientific,
and public input
Annual Revisions (Adaptive)
109 Ecosystem Management Criteria
- Societal Values
- Interstakeholder cooperation
- Organizational Change
- Human embedded in nature
- Ecological Boundaries
- Hierarchal context
- Ecological Integrity
- Data Collection Monitoring
- Adaptive Management
11Societal Values
- MGL chapter 372 legislation directed by society
- plan acknowledges that the values of different
stakeholder groups might conflict - historical and cultural values, such as
preserving the Old Stone Church, are emphasized - ecological values, especially preservation of
biodiversity and native species, are stressed - economic values of land, especially through
timber harvesting, are a key component of the
management plan - recreational values noted as possibly conflicting
with ecological concerns - BUT, all of these values are secondary to the
value of ensuring water quality
OVERALL RATING 9 out of 10
12Interstakeholder Cooperation
- 1995 agreement with USDA Forest Service to
provide technical assistance to private
landowners - 1998 agreement with DEM, to manage adjacent lands
together - coordinates with Massachusetts Water Resource
Agency responsible for water transmission and
treatment - plans to coordinate with Mass Wildlifes
Endangered Species and Natural Heritage Program
to inventory rare species and communities - most emphasis on interaction with private
landowners and the public than with other
governmental agencies - BUT, primary goal is to acquire and own watershed
lands and to have direct control over it
OVERALL RATING 5 out of 10
13Organizational Change
- No major institutional changes were undertaken as
a result of management plan - Changes in project implementation, such as timber
sales, law enforcement, and wildlife management - No indication as to receptiveness for future
organizational change - Note Romney administration proposes merging the
MDC with the DEM and forming a new Division of
Conservation and Recreation. Unsure of the
impacts on plan implementation, but funding cuts
are inevitable.
Overall Rating 7 out of 10
14Humans Embedded in Nature
- Plan acknowledges that ALL human activities on
the land have direct impacts on the watershed
ecosystem - Goal is to discourage land uses that degrade
water quality - Major anthropogenic disturbance is timber
harvesting - No measurable impact on water quality required
of all forest management activities - Public education programs encourage private
landowners and recreational users to be good
stewards of the land
Overall Rating 9 out of 10
15Ecological Boundaries
- Watershed Boundaries clearly defined, but major
challenge is managing across political boundaries
within watershed - Plan recognizes need to work across boundaries to
achieve goals and objectives of watershed
protection - Plan encourages private landowners to be proper
stewards of the land and to consider designing
strategic management plans that considers
surrounding ecosystem - Encourages Massachusetts Forest Stewardship
program - Cooperative agreements with other land protection
entities - Land acquisition program
Overall Rating 9 out of 10
16Hierarchical Context
- Plan does address need to manage beyond
individual parcel level (i.e. public outreach,
land acquisition program) - Systems Perspective addressed
- Ecosystem managed for primary purpose of ensuring
water quality, and other benefits are secondary
and associated with forest habitat - Most active management is focused on providing
habitat or conditions for rare and endangered
species, in areas that do not affect water
quality. -MDC/DWM
Overall Rating 6 out of 10
17Ecological Integrity
- Manage for native diversity, favor species best
suited for particular sites - Plan identifies the need to preserve critical
areas and sensitive habitat (vernal pools, seeps,
springs, orchards, buffer zones etc.) - Control or eradicate invasive/non-native species
- Promote uneven-aged forest to reduce impacts from
natural disturbance rather than emulate it - Not concerned with increasing habitat diversity,
primary concern is maintaining forested condition - Only concerned with maintaining existing open
space, rather than increasing its proportion - No plans to reintroduce extirpated native species
- The MDC recognizes that its greatest contribution
to regional biodiversity is protecting large
areas of land from development and maintaining
most of those lands in forest cover.
Overall Rating 7 out of 10
18Data Collection Monitoring
- Established water quality and forest conditions
monitoring system in place - Limited wildlife research conducted, plan
recognizes need for increased research on
endangered and high priority species - Plan recognizes need for vernal pool
certification of over 300 potential pools - Using Quabbin format for cultural resource
inventory - Extensive use of GIS database for management
- Most improvements dependant on funding and
personnel
Overall Score 7 out of 10
19Adaptive Management
- Annual revisions are done based on scientific,
technical, acquired lands, and public input (i.e.
Annual Wachusett Public meeting) - All of the mgt. actions are easily applicable to
newly acquired lands - This plan should be viewed as an adaptive
watershed management plan to be applied but
updated and modified as new properties are added
and new information comes to light. - -MDC/DWM
Overall Rating 9 out 10
20Key Points of Interest
- Positive Attributes
- Highly adaptable plan
- Effort to work with private landowners
- Addresses stakeholder values
- Negative Attributes
- Limited inventory of cultural and wildlife
resources - Inadequate interagency cooperation
- Lacks dynamic view of ecological processes
21Concluding Remarks
- Overall rating of 75, based on our criteria
- Overall, the plan addresses most of the ecosystem
management criteria required to be considered an
Ecosystem Management Plan - The issue is with constraints primary attention
to water quality, funding, personnel, private
landowner cooperation - Once these issues are addressed, the area will be
properly managed as an ecosystem