Title: Considerations in Practice Valuation
1Considerations in Practice Valuation
- A Quick Dirty Method of Practice Value
Estimation - John G. McDaniel, OD, MLHR
- President
- Waugoo Consulting Group
2Introduction
- About myself John McDaniel, OD, MLHR
- About Waugoo Consulting Group, LLC
- Contact information
- JMcDaniel_at_WaugooConsulting.com
- 614-352-4423
3First Question Why Do It?
- The first question that drives any
appraisal/valuation is the purpose - Practice appraisal (implies fair market analysis)
- Practice valuation (implies personal
consideration) - Quick estimation for comparisons of prospect
practices - Execution of the due diligence process
- Business plan and/or strategy development
- Borrowing asset determination/statement of net
worth - The purpose dictates the extensiveness of the
process and reasonable expenditure for the process
4DIY Valuations?
- Can some of these be done yourself?
- In my experience, only one the quick and dirty
(QD) method of estimation - A few caveats
- Be prepared to be frustrated this method is
simple but collecting the data can be complex - Incomplete financial records complicate the
process - QD estimation is a simplified version of the
industry market multiplier method used in full
blown appraisals
5Replacing a Professional Valuation?
- No, but why?
- Less rigorous and makes too many assumptions
- Too much variance in the data/conclusions
- It represents about 1/20 of the actual appraisal
process - Try to save a few thousand, risk tens or hundreds
of thousands (no exaggeration) - Comfort level with the sources of information
- Data is not just found it is corrected this
is where appraisers earn their fees - Lack of knowledge on industry norms, including
the financial industry norms (for borrowing
purposes) - What to do with missing/suspect data? Hard
questions that require experience to answer - Etcetera - you get the idea, right?
- In summary dont sell or buy a practice for a
price based solely on this method because it is
too simplistic and fails to capture a significant
amount of the complexity of the process
6QD Estimation
- Purpose to relatively quickly estimate the
approximate range for the selling price of a
given practice
- Usefulness most useful when comparing prospected
practices you need a minimal amount of data - Useful as a periodic business assessment tool
- Also can be used as a gauge on a professional
appraisal does this appraisal/valuation seem
reasonable?
7Assumptions Limitations
- Business activities are limited to normal
practice of optometry - Real estate is not included
- All assets used in the practice will be sold
- There will be a reasonable covenant not to
compete - All patient records will be sold
- There will be a reasonable transfer period
process - Etcetera things have to be pretty typical
because this process does not have mechanisms for
dealing with idiosyncratic aspects that are part
of all sales
8Data Needed to Start
- Gross Revenue (GR) for 3-5 years
- a. Get this from income tax docs
- Net income (NI) for the same 3-5 years
- You have to use a modified corrected NI (MCNI)
- MCNI reported NI plus add backs of OD income,
OD pension/benefits - The accuracy of the method does not justify a
more completely corrected NI - Usually can get this data from the tax docs
9Calculate Weighted Mean GR (?GRWT )
- This becomes the figure used in all future
estimation calculations, called ?GRWT - Make a data table to facilitate the process
- The table should have these columns/data
10Calculate Weighted Mean GR (?GRWT )
11Calculate Weighted Mean GR (?GRWT )
- Enter the GR for each year
12Calculate Weighted Mean GR (?GRWT )
13Calculate Weighted Mean GR (?GRWT )
- Enter the GR for each year
- Create the weights (WT) for each year
- Keep it simple the rigor does not justify
increased complexity (remember significant
digits?) - Higher WT on more recent years, in general
14Calculate Weighted Mean GR (?GRWT )
15Calculate Weighted Mean GR (?GRWT )
- Enter the GR for each year
- Create the weights (WT) for each year
- Keep it simple the rigor does not justify
increased complexity (remember significant
digits?) - Higher WT on more recent years, in general
- Multiply each years GR x WT
16Calculate Weighted Mean GR (?GRWT )
17Calculate Weighted Mean GR (?GRWT )
- Enter the GR for each year
- Create the weights (WT) for each year
- Keep it simple the rigor does not justify
increased complexity (remember significant
digits?) - Higher WT on more recent years, in general
- Multiply each years GR x WT
- Sum the weighted GR values and the total WTs used
18Calculate Weighted Mean GR (?GRWT )
19Calculate Weighted Mean GR (?GRWT )
- Enter the GR for each year
- Create the weights (WT) for each year
- Keep it simple the rigor does not justify
increased complexity (remember significant
digits?) - Higher WT on more recent years, in general
- Multiply each years GR x WT
- Sum the weighted GR values and the total WTs used
- Divide summed weighted GR by the sum of WTs
- This figure is your weighted mean GR (111,000)
20Calculate Weighted Mean GR (?GRWT )
21Calculate Weighted Mean Growth Rates
(?GrowthRateWT )
- Basic idea comparison of alternative investments
- This applies equally to the practice that sells
for 30K and another that sells for 2.5M those
purchase dollars could have been invested in
similar alternative investment vehicles (real
estate, equities, bonds, T-bills, etc.) - Why do you invest an something? For growth
and/or income generation this focuses on the
growth aspect of the investment, i.e. practice
22Calculate Weighted Mean Growth Rate
(?GrowthRateWT )
23Calculate Weighted Mean Growth Rates
(?GrowthRateWT )
- Enter the GR for each year
- Calculate the growth rates
- Formula (Year 2 Year1)/Year 1
- If 5 years of data, can get 4 rates (n-1 of
rates) - Create weights (WT) similar to before
- Multiply the WT x growth rates
- Sum the weighted growth rates and WTs
- Divide summed weighted growth rate by the sum of
WTs - This figure is your weighted mean growth rate
(2.97) - Is this growth?
24Calculate Weighted Mean Growth Rate (?GRWT )
25Determine Estimated Range
- Economically, the scale for growth has to be
normalized 3 is equal to no growth (CPI) - Use the following table to determine the
multiplier to use for range determination
26Multiplier Selection Growth Rate
27Determine Estimated Range
- Using the multiplier range, calculate the
estimated range for selling price - Multiply the low end of range x ?GRWT
- Multiply the high end of range x ?GRWT
- This is one of the estimations of selling price
range - For this example 49,500 - 60,500 based
exclusively on growth rates - Not done! More analysis is required, even for
simple estimating
28Calculate Weighted Mean Net Income as a of GR
(?NetIncGRWT )
- Basic idea evaluation of income stream
- This applies equally to the practice that sells
for 30K and another that sells for 2.5M those
investment vehicles each could have the same rate
of income return - Why do you invest an something? For growth
and/or income generation this focuses on the
income aspect of the investment, i.e. practice
29Calculate Weighted Mean Net Income as a of GR
(?NetIncGRWT )
30Calculate Weighted Mean Net Income as a of GR
(?NetIncGRWT )
- Enter the GR for each year
- Enter corrected NetInc for each year
- Corrections for this process add back OD income
and benefits - Calculate NetInc as a of GR (NetInc/GRNetIncGR
) - Create weights (WT) similar to before
- Multiply the WT x NetIncGR
- Sum the weighted net income and WTs
- Divide summed weighted net income rate by the
sum of WTs - This figure is your weighted mean net income as a
of gross revenue value (40.57) - How does this compare with the growth rate
analysis?
31Calculate Weighted Mean Net Income as a of GR
(?NetIncGRWT )
32Multiplier Selection Net Income
33Determine Estimated Range
- Using the multiplier range, calculate the
estimated range for selling price - Multiply the low end of range x ?GRWT
- Multiply the high end of range x ?GRWT
- This is one of the estimations of selling price
range - For this example 60,500 - 71,500 based
exclusively on net income rates - OK, almost done now!
34What To Do When?
- You get two different ranges (as with our
example)? - The results are not close to what I thought I
would get? - The basis for the overall range of .35 - .65
- Seller has amazing assets and they are not even
considered - Yup remember method assumptions
- This value doesnt take the real potential into
consideration - Yup, and that is how it should be price based on
past performance - Dont like it? Take the practice up to its
potential before selling! - The building will be involved in the sale is
this still the price? - No bring in separate appraiser and treat it as
a separate transaction - But this doesnt take into account ______ (AR,
AP, staff, location) - Yup this is why this is an estimation still
need real/full blown valuation/appraisal
35Things to Remember
- All of the flux in this simple process are
addressed in a full appraisal/valuation - A full appraisal does 10-15 more of these type of
calculations as part of 1/3 of the overall
process - What is being sold/purchased? The past
performance of the assets owned and goodwill - Potential does not increase the selling price
but it does increase interest - Is this a useful process if not selling/buying
the practice? - Yes can be done to evaluate the success of the
practice
36Thank You!
- Thanks to EyeCodeRight, the EyeCodeRight
Community and John Warren for this fantastic
forum and opportunity - My practice uses EyeCodeRight software (no
financial interest) and I love it! - How to contact me
- JMcDaniel_at_WaugooConsulting.com
- Phone 614-352-4423
- Thanks to all of you for taking the time to
listen! - Questions???