POL 201: Intro' To American Politics - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 26
About This Presentation
Title:

POL 201: Intro' To American Politics

Description:

Bureaucracy: puts laws into action. 100's of different organizations. Staffing is political ... Stare Decisis (aka: precedent) Court is reactive, not proactive ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:35
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 27
Provided by: cklof
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: POL 201: Intro' To American Politics


1
POL 201 Intro. To American Politics
  • Professor Casey Klofstad

2
Last Time Bureaucracy
  • Bureaucracy puts laws into action
  • 100s of different organizations
  • Staffing is political
  • Bureaucracy constrained by others
  • e.g., Congress, president, citizens
  • Bureaucracies face many problems
  • many bosses, difficult tasks, etc

3
Lecture 16 The Courts
  • The role of the judicial branch
  • Structure of the court system
  • state and federal
  • The Supreme Court
  • judicial review statutory interpretation
  • Constraints/checks on judicial power

4
Role of The Courts
  • Origin Constitution (Art. 3) is vague
  • just establishes The Supreme Court and gives
    Congress power to make more federal courts
  • Function check the other branches
  • interpret The Constitution and the law

5
2 Tracks Through the Court System Criminal
Civil
6
Structure of the US Judicial System
7
State Courts
  • 99 of cases originate on state level
  • Organization trial courts, appeals Courts, and
    State Supreme Court
  • Selection of Judges mostly by elections on the
    state level
  • is this desirable?

8
Federal Courts
  • When is a case federal, not state?
  • constitutional issues federal law when
    government is involved (state or federal)
  • Organization district courts, courts of appeal,
    Supreme Court
  • most work done at the district level

9
The Federal Circuit Court System
10
The Entire US Federal Court System
11
Selection of Federal Judges
  • All federal judges are
  • appointed by the president (no elections)
  • life-time appointment
  • Appointments need to be approved by the Senate
  • e.g., senatorial courtesy for district courts,
    senior Senator from the state where the judge
    will work must approve

12
Why a Non-Political Judiciary?
  • Ideally, we want a judiciary that Is separate
    from the other 2 branches
  • life-time tenure and no elections shelters judges
    from politics
  • BUT court decisions can reflect the ideology of
    the president that appointed the judge

13
Supreme Court Granting Cert
  • Writ of Certiorari when the Supreme Court
    agrees to hear a case
  • need 4 of the 9 Justices to agree
  • Granted less than 1 of the time
  • When is it granted then?
  • important constitutional issues when lower
    contorts are in conflict

14
Supreme Court Procedure
  • Justices hear from both sides, and from other
    interested parties (amicus curiae)
  • Majority Opinion is issued
  • dissenting and concurring opinions also issued
  • Case is remanded to lower court

15
Selection of SC Judges
  • Same as other federal judges
  • appointment for life senate confirmation
  • The confirmation process has become more
    contentious/political
  • borking
  • stealth candidates

16
What do Judges Do?
  • Judicial Review interpret the constitution
  • Statutory Interpretation interpret laws passed
    by the legislature

17
Judicial Review
  • Power to declare a law null and void on the basis
    that it violates The Constitution
  • NOT in The Constitution
  • BUTArticle VI says The Constitution is the
    supreme law of the land

18
Marbury v. Madison (1803)
  • New president refused to approve appointments
    made by his predecessor
  • One of these appointees sued to get his job based
    on a law called the Judiciary Act of 1789
  • SC exercises judicial review by ruling that the
    Judiciary Act is unconstitutional

19
Structure of the US Judicial System
20
Power of Judicial Review
  • New law trumps old law
  • Law of higher level of government trumps law on
    lower level
  • U.S. Constitution trumps all other laws

21
Original-Intent
  • Make decisions based on the desires of the
    framers
  • look at Constitution and other historical
    documents (e.g., Federalist Papers)
  • Role of court limited
  • constrained by what is determined to be the
    intent of the framers

22
Living-Constitution
  • Idea that original-intent is too rigid
  • So instead, interpret The Constitution in light
    of how the world works today
  • Role of Court strong
  • relies on the justices own experiences

23
Plain-Meaning
  • Idea that experiential is subjective
  • So instead, interpret The Constitution only based
    on what the text Says
  • Simple method, but The Constitution is vague and
    incomplete

24
Statutory
  • If a law is constitutional, determine how to
    implement/enforce it
  • Interpretation based on intent of Congress
  • BUT laws are vaguedetermining intent can be
    difficult and subjective

25
Checks on The Judiciary
  • Constitutional amendments
  • Statutory revision
  • Nonimplementation
  • Stare Decisis (aka precedent)
  • Court is reactive, not proactive
  • Court decisions typically reflect the mood of the
    times

26
POL 201 Intro. To American Politics
  • Professor Casey Klofstad
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com