A Population Balance Model for Agglomeration - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 19
About This Presentation
Title:

A Population Balance Model for Agglomeration

Description:

Size distributions are very similar after the same number of blade revolutions ... After 120 revolutions, very similar size distributions are observed at different ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:566
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 20
Provided by: cuewe
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: A Population Balance Model for Agglomeration


1
A Population Balance Model for Agglomeration
  • M. Goodson, M. Kraft, S. Forrest, J. Bridgwater

2
Powder Granulation
  • Dry calcium carbonate powder particles
  • Add aqueous polymer solution as binder
  • Irregular aggregates formed
  • Coagulation (sticking together)
  • no well-established rate law
  • Compaction (porosity reduction)
  • first order porosity reduction

3
Experimental Results Size Distributions
Size distributions are very similar after the
same number of blade revolutions
4
Results Qualitative Observations
5
Existing Population Balance Model 1
  • Characterise particle with three independent
    properties
  • solid volume, s,
  • liquid volume, l, and
  • air volume, a.
  • Particle can then be characterised according to
    whether it is
  • big (sla gt 500 ?m) or small
  • wet ( ) or dry
  • Conservation laws for two coagulating particles
    are simple

6
Existing Population Balance Model 2
  • Propose a property-independent collision rate
    with a property-dependent coagulation
    probability.
  • Observations lead to a table of coagulation
    probabilities
  • PhD
    Thesis PAL Wauters, TU Delft

7
Existing Population Balance Model 3
  • Compaction reduction of particle porosity, ?
  • Treated by using empirically derived rate law
  • In terms of the parameters of interest, porosity
    can be written as
  • So the rate of compaction can be expressed as
  • Which can lead to unphysical results

8
A New Population Balance Model
  • How do we characterise an aggregate?
  • solid volume, s
  • liquid volume, l
  • pore volume, p
  • total volume, v
  • porosity, ?
  • surface area, a
  • How many of these are independent?
  • How many of these are conserved?

9
Two types of Coagulation
(1)
(2)
  • Interactions can preserve surface area (1) or
    pore volume (2).
  • Real interactions may fall between these two
    extremes.
  • Need some way of predicting pore volume if area
    is known (and vice versa)

10
Characterising an Aggregate
Define theoretical radius that includes a total
volume equal to s p. Use fractal
dimensions Assume Relate pore volume to
surface area Now solid volume (and liquid
volume) conserved on aggregation so if surface
area is conserved, pore volume can be found (and
vice versa)
11
New Coagulation Probabilities
Include a consideration of whether particle is
either soft ( ) or hard
12
Experimental Results Size Distributions
Size distributions are very similar after the
same number of blade revolutions
13
Proposed Coagulation Rate
  • Set collision rate and compaction rate
    proportional to blade rotation speed
  • Expect similar size distributions after same
    number of rotations at different speeds
  • Make critical porosity (above which a particle
    is considered to be soft) a function of blade
    rotation speed
  • Expect to see differences in other particle
    properties (e.g. porosity) at different rotation
    speeds

?crit
?
14
Multi-dimensional Population Balances
  • pbe often size-dependent only
  • can be readily solved using standard
    deterministic techniques
  • This model is based on three independent
    particle properties
  • Solving the population balance equation by
    standard numerical methods gets prohibitively
    computationally expensive

15
Stochastic Simulation
  • Convert rate equations into probabilities that a
    certain event will happen within a given waiting
    time
  • This is a function of the whole population of
    particles at any given time
  • Update particle population according to either
    coagulation or compaction jump
  • Stochastic treatment of coagulation can be
    inefficient due to the need to consider n(n-1)/2
    possible coagulating pairs.
  • Increment timestep for every collision rather
    than every coagulation
  • Use table of probabilities to determine which
    collisions result in coagulations
  • Complexity of problem significantly reduced

16
Stochastic Particle System
17
Simulation Results 1
After 120 revolutions, very similar size
distributions are observed at different critical
porosities (to model different blade rotation
speeds)
18
Simulation Results 2
but differences can be observed in other
properties, such as the average particle porosity.
19
Conclusions
  • Some problems cannot be solved with a
    one-dimensional population balance
  • Standard numerical methods become prohibitively
    computationally expensive when applied to
    multi-dimensional population balances
  • Stochastic methods can be extended from one
    dimension to many without a significant loss of
    efficiency
  • Stochastic simulation has been shown to
    qualitatively predict the behaviour of
    granulating powders
  • Refinements to the model will then lead to
    quantitative prediction
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com