Title: ReThinking How Media Advertising Works
1Re-Thinking How Media Advertising Works
- Don E. Schultz, PhD.
- Northwestern University
-
- iMedia Brand Summit
- Deer Valley, Utah
- 13 September, 2004
2Basic Premise Most, If Not All, Our Media
Advertising Models Are Broken or Even Worse,
Irrelevant, in the 21st Century Marketplace
3A Three Part Proposition
- Lack of proof requires use of derived assumptions
about how media advertising works - Marketplace observations and on-going research on
how media advertising really works - First stage conceptual media advertising model
4A. Our Derived Assumptions
- Note A U.S. view but likely projectable to most
developed economies - Assumption 1 A Stimulus ? Response model
- Marketer controls the input and impact
- Based on a 4Ps marketing approach
- Assumption 2 Attitudinal Change ? Behavioral
Change - Behaviorist Psychology
- Some form of Hierarchy of Effects underlying all
media models
51961 - Hierarchy of Effects Model of How Media
Advertising Works
One-Way
Media Adver- tising
Attitudes/ Awareness
Purchase Behavior
Knowledge
Conviction
Preference
Linear
Influencing and Persuading Consumers
Source Adapted from Lavidge and Steiner
6- Assumption 3 A Supply-Chain model of media
message distribution
7Porters Supply Chain Model
Media Systems
Media Planning
Measurement
Broadcast
Interaction
Contact
Print
Marketers
Agencies
Consumers/End Users
8- Assumption 4 Each media form works separately
and independently of any other. Therefore, each
is and should be planned and measured separately
and independently.
9Separate and Independent View of Media
Communication Planning, Distribution and
Measurement
Product Marketing
Sales Promotion
Events/ Sponsorships
Direct Mail
Public Relations
Media Advertising
Consumers
Attitudes
Behaviors
?
10Our Media Systems Are Based On Still Unproven
Hypotheses, Discounted Models, Out-of-Date
Methodologies, Intuition and Tenuous Associations
11Yet, Last Year, U.S. Advertisers Invested 250
Billion in Media Advertising Based on These
Assumptions and Hypotheses!
12B. Our Marketplace Observations and On-Going
Research
- Clearly, consumers have solved, or at least
resolved, the complex, multi-media marketplace in
which they live cognitive psychology models and
media multi-tasking
13Magazines
Newspapers
Internet
Outdoor
Consumers View of Media Advertising
Radio
Wireless
Television
World Wide Web
14People Simultaneously Using Or Consuming Multiple
Media Forms at Single Points in Time
- Information explosion forces consumers to extend,
expand and change their media usage - Rapid consumer acceptance of new media forms
- Consumers multi-tasking with media i.e.,
reading the newspaper, talking on a cell phone,
on-line and tracking the TV all at the same
time Simultaneous Media Usage
15Evidence? SIMM Studies in USA
- Identification and verification of simultaneous
media usage (SIMM) among US population Four
studies in the US since Spring, 2002 (4th in
analysis now) - Research among double opt-in subscriber network
of 60 million individuals - E-mail, not internet, gathered responses
- Respondents report media usage and other
purchasing factors products, retailers, etc. - Current sample base of 30,000 individuals
(15,000 more in Wave 4) - Accuracy at .01 level
- Benchmarked to non-online studies
- Weighting and balancing of 14 U.S. census age-sex
cells
16When you watch TV, do you simultaneously go
online?
17When you go online, do you simultaneously watch
TV?
18Clear Evidence of New Media Advertising Issues
- What comprises an audience?
- Consumers create foreground and background
media for themselves and for the occasion - What is the impact of conflicting messages
delivered at the same moment in time? - Simultaneous multi-media usage suggests all media
are likely overpriced
19When you read the newspaper, do you
simultaneously watch TV?
20When you watch TV, do you simultaneously read
magazines?
21When you read magazines, do you simultaneously
listen to the radio?
22On an Average Weekday (Monday-Friday), from
730pm to 11pm do you
23SIMM Evidence Challenges Almost Every Media
Planning, Distribution And Measurement Model
Currently in Use
24C. Synergy Among Media Forms
- Naik and Raman, Journal of Marketing Research,
November, 2003 - Understanding the Impact of Synergy in
Multimedia Communications - Methodology
- Adaptation of basic dynamic advertising model
- Palda (1964) First order autoregressive
advertising model - Montgomery Silk (1972) Multimedia
advertising, with each medium having different
marketplace effects - Gopalakrishna and Chatterjee (1992)
Introduction of interaction terms to capture
joint effects - Jazwinski (1970) Addition of Kalman filters to
model dynamic results over time
25- Demonstrated practicality using real world data
to explain media synergy synergy between media
forms demonstrates increase in expected sales and
enhanced media effectiveness - Results Demonstrable and measurable media
interaction and synergy between television and
newspaper advertising where to add media, where
to reduce media efficiency improvement
26Tying the Three Pieces Together
- Today, media advertising likely works based on
consumer media consumption, not on
advertiser/marketer message distribution - Our media planning models need to be re-thought,
revised and revamped to deal with consumer
simultaneous media consumption - New media measurement systems are needed
- Media pricing models must be re-visited
27Our First Attempt at a 21st Century Model of How
Media Advertising Really Works
28 Media Consumption Model
29The Difference?Its Not How Many Messages You
Send Out..Its How Much Media Is Consumed by
the Audience!
30Well be Developing This First Model During Fall,
2004 at Northwestern University.. Stay Tuned
31Summary
- Our media planning, measurement and evaluation
models are broken they must be fixed - Consumer media consumption is one alternative
model of how media advertising works there may
be others - We will continue to conduct research on SIMM and
other factors that may help explain and
illustrate how consumers really use media - We encourage your help and support
32Questions, Comments or Discussion?
33Don E. Schultz Ph.D. dschultz_at_northwestern.edu