Binary Star Evolution - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 25
About This Presentation
Title:

Binary Star Evolution

Description:

To zeroth order all stars are members of multiple systems! ... no beautiful sequences of mathematically impeccable binary star models to which ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:114
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 26
Provided by: kevinc87
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Binary Star Evolution


1
Binary Star Evolution
  • Cevin Kroxall
  • Stellar Atmospheres à la Pilachowski

2
Binaries
  • To zeroth order all stars are members of multiple
    systems!
  • Really makes a difference when stars are
    interacting binaries
  • 30-50 of all stars
  • i.e. one of the stars fills its Roche lobe
  • More likely to encounter this after the main
    sequence phase
  • Half the stars in the sky have yet to experience
    this
  • Half of those stars will be interacting binaries
    in the future

3
Binary Stars
4
Binary Origins
  • At least 50 of PMS objects are multiple systems
  • Binaries are created before the disks clear and
    bonafide PMS stars are revealed
  • Start with a molecular cloud
  • No B-field
  • Lots of physics
  • And 1 key assumption its similar to single star
    formation

5
Are Formation Times Related to Periods?
  • Collapse starts
  • Gas becomes opaque
  • Ionization
  • Total Ionization of H
  • Quasi Equilibrium
  • Tohline, J 2002 ARAA, 40, 349

6
Formation Mechanisms
  • Capture
  • Need favorable three body encounters
  • Very improbable (maybe in globular cores)
  • Prompt Fragmentation
  • Only homologous collapses work
  • No scrambling of mass, proportionally collapsed
  • Does NOT occur before at least 1 free-fall time
  • Can occur in rotating clouds on the 1st quasi
    equilibrium state
  • Mixed Results very dependant on initial
    conditions and resolution in models
  • fragments but binaries?

7
Formation Mechanisms
  • Delayed Break-Up
  • Free-fall and formation of a massive accretion
    disk which becomes unstable
  • Get Dumb-bells and pears
  • We assume!!!
  • No one has actually done it! Rely on stability
    tests
  • Leave out viscosity and get compressible
    ellipsoids
  • Doesnt seem to lead to binaries

8
Binary Formation Summary
  • In conclusion binary formation is the primary
    branch of the star formation process. Obviously
    nature knows how to form binary star systems.
    Hopefully, in the coming decade we will find
    one or more fully convincing ways to do so as
    well.

Tohline, J 2002 ARAA, 40, 349
9
Binary Evolution
  • The theory of binary star evolution relies
    heavily on models of single stars
  • The theory of binary star evolution has a much
    different character then does the theory of
    single star evolution.
  • There are no beautiful sequences of
    mathematically impeccable binary star models to
    which one can point with pride and compare
    successfully with observations.
  • Iben, 1991, ApJSS, 76, 55

10
Roche Lobes
  • First basic concept in binary evolution theory
  • A unique surface of constant potential which
    consists of two separate lobes, each enclosing
    on of the stellar components
  • A particle inside a lobe experiences a force in
    the direction of the enclosed star
  • Assumptions
  • Centrally concentrated star
  • Rotation is synchronous with orbit
  • Circularized orbit

L2
Irradiated Roche Lobe - Podsialdlowskix http//
www-astro.physics.ox.ac.uk/podsi/podsiadlowski1.h
tml
  • Iben, 1991, ApJSS, 76, 55

VV Cephei systems e?0.5
11
Roche Lobe OverflowHow to fill your lobe
  • Growth of a component due to internal changes
  • Orbital shrinkage due to loss of angular momentum
  • Swelling due to rejection of accreated matter or
    nuclear ignition
  • A hardening collision between the binary and
    another star

12
Remnant Mass Composition
  • Second major concept/assumption in binary
    evolution
  • The remnant of the of the donor will have the
    same mass and composition as the core of the
    donor when it first fills its Roche lobe
  • Iben, 1991, ApJSS, 76, 55

13
Mass Transfer Mass Conservation
  • 3rd Concept - Function of the structure of the
    component at the moment of overflow, the degree
    of mass angular momentum conservation, and the
    response of the companion
  • dM/dt -M/?th
  • If the donor does not posses a deep convective
    envelope, then mass angular momentum
    conservation is acceptable

14
Common Envelope
  • 4th Concept - Secondary may form a hot expanding
    layer which then fills its Roche lobe
  • Provides a frictional interaction between
    embedded cores and shedding material
  • Leads to a tighter bound orbit
  • One of the least understood phases of binary
    evolution
  • One of the most important phases of binary
    evolution

15
Common Envelope Problems
  • Donor has a mass larger than 70 of the accretor
  • Theoretically most red giant donors should
    experience this phase
  • Observationally this is not true
  • Mass loss by stellar wind prior to mass transfer?
  • When can the CE be ejected? When do we get a
    complete merger?

16
Orbital Angular Momentum Loss
  • 5th Concept - Angular momentum loss can drive or
    sustain Roche Lobe filling (keep a component in
    conact with its Roche lobe despite it shrinking)
  • Mechanisms to get rid of angular momentum
  • Magnetic stellar wind
  • Gravitational wave radiation
  • Tidal torques
  • 3-body interactions

What happens to magnetic breaking when a donor
becomes fully convective? (dynamo is killed)
17
General Classification
  • Based upon the evolutionary stage of the mass
    donor at the beginning of mass transfer
  • Case A - main-sequence
  • Case B - post-main-sequence, pre-helium-ignition
  • Case C - post-helium-buring
  • Two modes of mass transfer
  • Quasi-conservative
  • donor has a radiative envelope, orbital periods
    increase
  • Dynamical
  • Donor is giant with a deep convective envelope,
    orbits shrink
  • Either an ejection of the common envelope leaving
    a tight binary or tidal destruction of binary
    components leading to a merger

SN 1987A over production? - Mass loss w/o spiral
in? - radiative common envelope?
18
The Summary Iben Figures
The adventure begins
The CV sequence
The most likely end
19
The Summary Iben Figures
20
Blue Stragglers (BS)
  • Found above the turnoff
  • Found in both (and nearly all) open and globular
    clusters from 108 - 1013 years old
  • First seen in M3 by Sandage (1953)
  • Some are almost definitely NOT binaries
  • Often centrally concentrated in clusters
  • Li under abundant
  • Slow rotators
  • All are at least slightly evolved
  • 4 are eclipsing binaries!!!!
  • Only 0.1 of main sequence stars in globulars are
    eclipsers

21
More BS
Johnson Sandage 1955, ApJ, 121, 616
  • UBIQUITOUS BUT RARE
  • Only a few percent of the stars that previously
    populated that area of the HR diagram

Blue staggler-hood afflicts relatively few stars
in a typical cluster
22
Creating BS
  • Stellar Merger Remnants
  • Contraction of longer period binaries into
    contact binaries from angular momentum loss
  • Related to timescales which we dont know
  • Stellar Collision Remnants
  • Requires binary - binary collisions
  • Could be responsible for 10-20
  • High numbers of eclipsers?

BOTH REQUIRE MANY PRIMORDIAL BINARIES
23
Future BS
  • Better statistics
  • Constrain ages
  • More BS are binaries in open clusters
  • Is this real? (? - mergers ? - collisions)
  • Radial distributions
  • Why are they slow rotators?
  • Need masses
  • Faint main sequence proto-BS?

24
Short Period Tidally Locked Binaries
  • Preserve fragile elements like Li by freezing
    mixing in surface layers due to tidal torques

25
Binary Summary
  • Even though a star may be single now, it may
    well have been a member of a binary system in the
    past. Indeed, whenever one is confronted with a
    new stellar phenomenon, it is probably adviable
    to first thoroughly explore the possibility of a
    binary interaction as a cause of the phenomenon
    before starting to adjust the input physics in
    the stellar calculation.

P. Podsiadlowski (emphasis added)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com