Summary Feedback Day Two

1
Summary Feedback Day Two

• Six Groups

2
Group One
3
Group One

• Lack of personalization in the process
• Scrutinies are more personalized with
  participation of the candidate rendiconto is
  more of a listening
• Signs of integrated paradigm
• What a blessing when a community has some members
  coming from a different paradigm

4
Group Two

• Classical paradigm received and being used
  nevertheless comfortable in finding that there
  are other paradigms
• Need to be using more the participative way,
  involvement of the formands
• Another challenge being faced how to have an
  integral paradigm for every member of the
  formation team? How can these members come to
  understand the other paradigms?

5
Group Three

• Question where are you coming from? Vows seems
  not to be crucial for the resource person
  instead the way we SDBs see the vows, they are
  the expression of the eschatogoloical sign
• Formed classical paradigm
• Way doing formation eclectic
• Do we have a paradigm as a Congregation/as a
  region?

6
Group Three

• Shall we be adopting a paradigm?

7
Group Four

• Appealing paradigm integral model lifestyle is
  the following of Christ through the evangelical
  counsels
• Lacking on the formation to justice and
  ecological concerns because we are not yet using
  the integral model
• Sacramental model non-christian environment,
  practice of the sacraments is a curiosity

8
Group Four

• What makes us different from the lay? Since
  vocation is a gift a personal call, it does not
  matter whether we do the same thing the call is
  what distinguishes

9
Group Five

• Religious life hidden treasure good paradigm
• Need to find this treasure because to possess it
  is not enough there is a need to develop it
  bring it to life
• This treasure is Jesus need to follow Jesus,
  live his lifestyle, choose what Jesus chose

10
Group Five

• What Jesus lived was the chaste, poor and
  obedient life thus, to live chaste, poor and
  obedient
• What Jesus chose was the poor, the abandoned and
  for their sake he offered his life thus we
  choose the poor and the abandoned and offer ones
  life for them
• Which paradigm? Primitive paradigm of Anthony of
  the Desert fuga mundi - desert

11
Group Five

• Trinitate-fraternitate-caritate paradigm
• Initiative comes from God model is Jesus
• Community
• From community we are sent to mission
• Mission is to bring people back to God
• God-SDB-Young paradigm
• God-SDB coetera tolle

12
Group Five

• SDB-Young Da mihi animas
• Young-God youth spirituality
• At the heart of this paradigm pastoral charity
  (C.10)

13
Group Six

• Did not feel well with the different paradigms
• A lot of the traditional paradigm
• Also a lot of mixture of the post-modern paradigm
• Mission seems to be emphasized
• God-centered mentality of older generation vs
  person-centered mentality of the younger
  generation

14
Group Six

• Happy about the session today

15
Impressions

• Different paradigm according to different stage
  of formation e.g. novitiate stress on person
  other time of formation stress on mission
• Language in integral model process
• God in integral model experience of God in all
• Scrutiny/Rendiconto reinterpreted more as a
  joint process