Title: The University of Texas at San Antonio
1The University of Texas at San Antonio
- FY 07 Annual Financial Report
- Highlights
- January, 2008
2Annual Financial Report Highlights
- The Annual Financial Report (AFR) is made up of
three primary - statements with many supporting schedules.
- 1. Balance Sheet Explains what we own, our
obligations and what is available. - 2. Statement of Revenues, Expenses and Changes
in Net Assets (SRECNA) Shows the results of
operations for the year. - 3. Statement of Cash Flows Shows what revenue
came in, what was expended and what is left. - Review pie charts and ratios that help explain
our financial condition
3UTSA FY 07Balance Sheet
- The Balance Sheet has three sections
- Assets What we own - Items that are available
to meet operating costs of the Institution, plus
buildings, land, equipment, etc. - Investments increased by 53.5M due to additions,
investment income and appreciation. - Capital Assets increased by 106.2M predominantly
due to the construction of Rec Center II, Laurel
Village, BSE II, Thermal Energy Plant and
University Center III. - Liabilities Our obligations -Amounts due and
payable within one year or beyond. - Net Assets Whats available - Capital Assets
net of depreciation, endowment funds and other
unrestricted funds. - Amount invested in Capital Assets increased
predominately by 106.2M due to construction. - Unrestricted Net Assets grew by 27.0M due to
increase in Tuition Fees.
4The Statement of Revenue, Expenses, and Changes
in Net Assets (SRECNA) . This statement is
called the Operating Statement as it reports
the results of operations for the year.
2007
2006
UTSA Operating Revenues ( in millions)
2007
2006
UTSA Operating Revenues ( in millions)
143.5
118.7
Student Tuition and Fees
-
Net of Discounts
143.57
118.7
Student Tuition and Fees
-
Net of Discounts
72.8
Sponsored Programs
72.8
73.2
Sponsored Programs
73.2
Sales and Services of Educational Activities
6.7
6.0
Sales and Services of Educational Activities
6.7
6.0
Auxiliary Enterprises
15.1
14.2
Auxiliary Enterprises
14.2
15.1
Other
2.5
3.2
Other
3.2
2.5
- Tuition and Fees increased by 24.8M.
- Operating loss is calculated before state
appropriations. Tuition and fees increased more
than operating expenses causing a slight change. - The increase is predominantly due to a 8.3M
increase in FV of investments and increase in net
investment income of 4.8M. - Mandatory Transfers represent amounts transferred
to System Admin to pay debt service, and
nonmandatory transfers represent anticipated bond
proceeds transferred to UTSA to fund construction
projects. - As on the previous exhibit, Change in Net Assets
was 126.2M. In the current year operations,
this is most dramatically impacted by the
transfers from system of bond proceeds for
capital improvement projects.
Total Operating Revenues
240.6
215.3
Total Operating Revenues
215.3
240.6
315.6
Total Operating Expenses
315.6
293.8
Total Operating Expenses
293.8
Operating Loss
(75.0)
Operating Loss
(75.0)
(78.5)
Nonoperating
Revenues (Expenses)
Nonoperating
Revenues (Expenses)
98.1
97.1
State Appropriations
98.1
97.1
State Appropriations
3.8
3.5
Gift Contributions
3.8
3.5
Gift Contributions
10.8
6.0
Net Investment Income (Loss)
10.9
6.1
Net Investment Income (Loss)
12.4
4.1
Net Inc. (Dec.) in Fair Value of Investments
12.4
4.1
Net Inc. (Dec.) in Fair Value of Investments
Gain/(Loss) on State of Capital Assets
(0.1)
Income (Loss) Before Other Revenues, Expenses,
Gains
50.1
32.2
Other
Nonoperating
Revenues/Expenses
0.0
0.0
or Losses
Income (Loss) Before Other Revenues, Expenses,
Gains
Gifts and Sponsored Programs
0.0
0.6
or Losses
50.1
32.2
Additions to Permanent Endowments
4.0
4.9
Gifts and Sponsored Programs
0.0
0.6
Reclass
From (To) Other Institutions
(48.7)
19.8
Additions to Permanent Endowments
4.0
4.9
Mandatory Transfers
(19.7)
(16.6)
Reclass
From (To) Other Institutions
(48.7)
19.8
Mandatory Transfers
-
Comp Sys Admin
-
Debt Svc
(19.7)
(16.6)
Nonmandatory
Transfers
141.9
28.6
Nonmandatory
Transfers
-
Comp Sys Admin
141.9
28.6
Transfers From (To) Other State entities
(1.4)
(0.8)
Transfers From (To) Other State entities
(1.4)
Change in Net Assets
126.2
68.7
Change in Net Assets
126.2
68.7
Net Assets, Beginning of the Year
635.1
566.4
Net Assets, Beginning of the Year
635.1
566.4
761.3
635.1
Net Assets, End of the Year
761.3
635.1
Net Assets, End of the Year
4
5UTSA FY 07Statement of Cash Flows
- Cash from operations includes tuition and fees
and expenditures for operations includes
salaries, depreciation, scholarship/fellowship
and supplies. - Noncapital financing activities include State
appropriations and Gifts. - Capital and related financing activities include
purchase of equipment and construction of
buildings. - Investing Activities include the purchase/sale of
investments, interest income and endowment income
distribution. - Cash Cash Equivalents decreased slightly.
6UTSA FY 2007 Sources of Revenue by Category
7UTSA FY 07 Sources of Revenue
7
8UTSA FY 07 Uses of Funds
9UTSA FY 07 Analysis of Financial
ConditionComposite Financial Index
- Composite Financial Index measures the overall
financial health by combining four core ratios
into a single score primary reserve ratio,
expendable resources to debt ratio, return on net
assets ratio and the annual operating margin
ratio. - The CFI increased by .8 primarily due to
increase in interest earnings and appreciation on
investments, as well as higher net operating
income. - Systems benchmark is 3.0 or greater.
10UTSA FY 07 Analysis of Financial
ConditionOperating Expense Coverage Ratio
- Measures an institutions ability to cover future
operating expenses with available year-end
balances. Ratio is expressed in number of months
coverage. - Increase from 4.2 months to 5.0 months is due to
increase in unrestricted net assets as a result
of increases in Tuition Fees attributable to
enrollment growth and rate increases. - System Satisfactory rating is at two months or
above and should be stable or improve.
11UTSA FY 07 Analysis of Financial ConditionDebt
Service Coverage Ratio
- This ratio measures the actual margin of
protection provided to investors by annual
operations. Calculation is used by Moodys
Investment Services, system-wide to determine
bond rating. This is watched very closely so UT
System can maintain AAA bond rating. - Trend helps to determine if an institution has
assumed more debt than it can afford to service. - Our trend is growing exceeding UT Systems
benchmark of greater than 2.4. This means that
our net resources are 3.1 times what we are
currently expending for debt payments. The ratio
increased slightly due to operating performance
off-set by increased debt service.
12UTSA FY 07 Analysis of Financial
ConditionExpendable Resources to Debt Ratio
- This ratio measures an institutions ability to
fund outstanding debt with existing net asset
balances should an emergency occur. - UTSAs debt ratio changed slightly due to a
decrease in expendable net assets restricted for
capital projects as a result of completion of
capital improvement projects. - This ratio basically shows that more and more of
our resources are going towards paying off debt.
Systems Satisfactory benchmark is 0.7x or
greater.
Restated
Restated
13UTSA FY07 Analysis of Financial ConditionDebt
Burden Ratio
- This ratio examines the institutions dependence
on borrowed funds and cost of borrowing relative
to overall expenses. - UTSAs debt burden ratio increased as a result of
a major capital improvements program resulting in
increased debt service payments. The institution
is heavily reliant on debt to fund cost. - Systems Satisfactory benchmark is less than
4.3.
14UTSA FY 07 AFR Summary
- UTSA continues to receive a Satisfactory rating
from UT System as a result of a healthy financial
condition. - UTSAs operating margin ratio of 8.4 is strong
but not sustainable future expenditures are
expected to exceed revenue growth as new
positions are hired and needed infrastructure is
purchased to meet growth demands. We will have to
closely monitor our debt as we continue to
require additional facilities.