The University of Texas at San Antonio

1 / 14
About This Presentation
Title:

The University of Texas at San Antonio

Description:

... charts and ratios that help explain our financial condition. 3 ... The ratio increased slightly due to operating performance off-set by increased debt service. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:23
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 15
Provided by: pattic3
Learn more at: https://www.utsa.edu

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: The University of Texas at San Antonio


1
The University of Texas at San Antonio
  • FY 07 Annual Financial Report
  • Highlights
  • January, 2008

2
Annual Financial Report Highlights
  • The Annual Financial Report (AFR) is made up of
    three primary
  • statements with many supporting schedules.
  • 1. Balance Sheet Explains what we own, our
    obligations and what is available.
  • 2. Statement of Revenues, Expenses and Changes
    in Net Assets (SRECNA) Shows the results of
    operations for the year.
  • 3. Statement of Cash Flows Shows what revenue
    came in, what was expended and what is left.
  • Review pie charts and ratios that help explain
    our financial condition

3
UTSA FY 07Balance Sheet
  • The Balance Sheet has three sections
  • Assets What we own - Items that are available
    to meet operating costs of the Institution, plus
    buildings, land, equipment, etc.
  • Investments increased by 53.5M due to additions,
    investment income and appreciation.
  • Capital Assets increased by 106.2M predominantly
    due to the construction of Rec Center II, Laurel
    Village, BSE II, Thermal Energy Plant and
    University Center III.
  • Liabilities Our obligations -Amounts due and
    payable within one year or beyond.
  • Net Assets Whats available - Capital Assets
    net of depreciation, endowment funds and other
    unrestricted funds.
  • Amount invested in Capital Assets increased
    predominately by 106.2M due to construction.
  • Unrestricted Net Assets grew by 27.0M due to
    increase in Tuition Fees.

4
The Statement of Revenue, Expenses, and Changes
in Net Assets (SRECNA) . This statement is
called the Operating Statement as it reports
the results of operations for the year.
2007
2006
UTSA Operating Revenues ( in millions)
2007
2006
UTSA Operating Revenues ( in millions)
143.5
118.7
Student Tuition and Fees
-
Net of Discounts
143.57
118.7
Student Tuition and Fees
-
Net of Discounts
72.8
Sponsored Programs
72.8
73.2
Sponsored Programs
73.2
Sales and Services of Educational Activities
6.7
6.0
Sales and Services of Educational Activities
6.7
6.0
Auxiliary Enterprises
15.1
14.2
Auxiliary Enterprises
14.2
15.1
Other
2.5
3.2
Other
3.2
2.5
  • Tuition and Fees increased by 24.8M.
  • Operating loss is calculated before state
    appropriations. Tuition and fees increased more
    than operating expenses causing a slight change.
  • The increase is predominantly due to a 8.3M
    increase in FV of investments and increase in net
    investment income of 4.8M.
  • Mandatory Transfers represent amounts transferred
    to System Admin to pay debt service, and
    nonmandatory transfers represent anticipated bond
    proceeds transferred to UTSA to fund construction
    projects.
  • As on the previous exhibit, Change in Net Assets
    was 126.2M. In the current year operations,
    this is most dramatically impacted by the
    transfers from system of bond proceeds for
    capital improvement projects.

Total Operating Revenues
240.6
215.3
Total Operating Revenues
215.3
240.6
315.6
Total Operating Expenses
315.6
293.8
Total Operating Expenses
293.8
Operating Loss
(75.0)
Operating Loss
(75.0)
(78.5)
Nonoperating
Revenues (Expenses)
Nonoperating
Revenues (Expenses)
98.1
97.1
State Appropriations
98.1
97.1
State Appropriations
3.8
3.5
Gift Contributions
3.8
3.5
Gift Contributions
10.8
6.0
Net Investment Income (Loss)
10.9
6.1
Net Investment Income (Loss)
12.4
4.1
Net Inc. (Dec.) in Fair Value of Investments
12.4
4.1
Net Inc. (Dec.) in Fair Value of Investments
Gain/(Loss) on State of Capital Assets
(0.1)
Income (Loss) Before Other Revenues, Expenses,
Gains
50.1
32.2
Other
Nonoperating
Revenues/Expenses
0.0
0.0
or Losses
Income (Loss) Before Other Revenues, Expenses,
Gains
Gifts and Sponsored Programs
0.0
0.6
or Losses
50.1
32.2
Additions to Permanent Endowments
4.0
4.9
Gifts and Sponsored Programs
0.0
0.6
Reclass
From (To) Other Institutions
(48.7)
19.8
Additions to Permanent Endowments
4.0
4.9
Mandatory Transfers
(19.7)
(16.6)
Reclass
From (To) Other Institutions
(48.7)
19.8
Mandatory Transfers
-
Comp Sys Admin
-
Debt Svc
(19.7)
(16.6)

Nonmandatory
Transfers
141.9
28.6
Nonmandatory
Transfers
-
Comp Sys Admin
141.9
28.6
Transfers From (To) Other State entities
(1.4)
(0.8)
Transfers From (To) Other State entities
(1.4)
Change in Net Assets
126.2
68.7
Change in Net Assets
126.2
68.7
Net Assets, Beginning of the Year
635.1
566.4
Net Assets, Beginning of the Year
635.1
566.4
761.3
635.1
Net Assets, End of the Year
761.3
635.1
Net Assets, End of the Year
4
5
UTSA FY 07Statement of Cash Flows
  • Cash from operations includes tuition and fees
    and expenditures for operations includes
    salaries, depreciation, scholarship/fellowship
    and supplies.
  • Noncapital financing activities include State
    appropriations and Gifts.
  • Capital and related financing activities include
    purchase of equipment and construction of
    buildings.
  • Investing Activities include the purchase/sale of
    investments, interest income and endowment income
    distribution.
  • Cash Cash Equivalents decreased slightly.

6
UTSA FY 2007 Sources of Revenue by Category
7
UTSA FY 07 Sources of Revenue
7
8
UTSA FY 07 Uses of Funds
9
UTSA FY 07 Analysis of Financial
ConditionComposite Financial Index
  • Composite Financial Index measures the overall
    financial health by combining four core ratios
    into a single score primary reserve ratio,
    expendable resources to debt ratio, return on net
    assets ratio and the annual operating margin
    ratio.
  • The CFI increased by .8 primarily due to
    increase in interest earnings and appreciation on
    investments, as well as higher net operating
    income.
  • Systems benchmark is 3.0 or greater.

10
UTSA FY 07 Analysis of Financial
ConditionOperating Expense Coverage Ratio
  • Measures an institutions ability to cover future
    operating expenses with available year-end
    balances. Ratio is expressed in number of months
    coverage.
  • Increase from 4.2 months to 5.0 months is due to
    increase in unrestricted net assets as a result
    of increases in Tuition Fees attributable to
    enrollment growth and rate increases.
  • System Satisfactory rating is at two months or
    above and should be stable or improve.

11
UTSA FY 07 Analysis of Financial ConditionDebt
Service Coverage Ratio
  • This ratio measures the actual margin of
    protection provided to investors by annual
    operations. Calculation is used by Moodys
    Investment Services, system-wide to determine
    bond rating. This is watched very closely so UT
    System can maintain AAA bond rating.
  • Trend helps to determine if an institution has
    assumed more debt than it can afford to service.
  • Our trend is growing exceeding UT Systems
    benchmark of greater than 2.4. This means that
    our net resources are 3.1 times what we are
    currently expending for debt payments. The ratio
    increased slightly due to operating performance
    off-set by increased debt service.

12
UTSA FY 07 Analysis of Financial
ConditionExpendable Resources to Debt Ratio
  • This ratio measures an institutions ability to
    fund outstanding debt with existing net asset
    balances should an emergency occur.
  • UTSAs debt ratio changed slightly due to a
    decrease in expendable net assets restricted for
    capital projects as a result of completion of
    capital improvement projects.
  • This ratio basically shows that more and more of
    our resources are going towards paying off debt.
    Systems Satisfactory benchmark is 0.7x or
    greater.

Restated
Restated
13
UTSA FY07 Analysis of Financial ConditionDebt
Burden Ratio
  • This ratio examines the institutions dependence
    on borrowed funds and cost of borrowing relative
    to overall expenses.
  • UTSAs debt burden ratio increased as a result of
    a major capital improvements program resulting in
    increased debt service payments. The institution
    is heavily reliant on debt to fund cost.
  • Systems Satisfactory benchmark is less than
    4.3.

14
UTSA FY 07 AFR Summary
  • UTSA continues to receive a Satisfactory rating
    from UT System as a result of a healthy financial
    condition.
  • UTSAs operating margin ratio of 8.4 is strong
    but not sustainable future expenditures are
    expected to exceed revenue growth as new
    positions are hired and needed infrastructure is
    purchased to meet growth demands. We will have to
    closely monitor our debt as we continue to
    require additional facilities.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)